Abstract
Cell fusion events are essential for the maintenance of skeletal muscle tissue and during its repair processes after damage. However, these mechanisms have not come much into focus in the recent years. Different methods can be used to assess ongoing cell fusion events in adult skeletal muscle tissue. Among these methods, confocal microscopy, western blotting, and quantitative polymerase chain reactions are ideal, since they provide concerted information about cell fusion events going on in skeletal muscle tissue at both qualitative and quantitative levels. Confocal microscopy allows for the visualization of exact localizations of cell fusion events in adult skeletal muscle. Western blotting allows for a semiquantitative evaluation of protein levels involved and associated with cell fusions events. Finally, quantitative polymerase chain reaction is a valuable tool to precisely assess mRNA levels of genes involved and associated with cell fusions events. In addition to the investigation if cell fusion markers in skeletal muscle tissue, in vitro cell culture systems (e.g., C2C12 cells) can be used to study cell fusions events in a highly standardized system in order to obtain detailed information about genes and proteins involved in these processes. Here, confocal microscopy, western blotting, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction are described as methods to investigate cell fusion events and how a C2C12 cell culture system can be run to support the studies of adult muscle tissue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fluck M, Hoppeler H (2003) Molecular basis of skeletal muscle plasticity–from gene to form and function. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 146:159–216
Bentzinger CF, Wang YX, Dumont NA, Rudnicki MA (2013) Cellular dynamics in the muscle satellite cell niche. EMBO Rep 14:1062–1072
Mauro A (1961) Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9:493–495
Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le GF, Rudnicki MA (2007) Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129:999–1010
Hochreiter-Hufford AE, Lee CS, Kinchen JM, Sokolowski JD, Arandjelovic S, Call JA, Klibanov AL, Yan Z, Mandell JW, Ravichandran KS (2013) Phosphatidylserine receptor BAI1 and apoptotic cells as new promoters of myoblast fusion. Nature 497:263–267
Abmayr SM, Pavlath GK (2012) Myoblast fusion: lessons from flies and mice. Development 139:641–656
Larsson LI, Bjerregaard B, Talts JF (2008) Cell fusions in mammals. Histochem Cell Biol 129:551–561
Dupressoir A, Vernochet C, Bawa O, Harper F, Pierron G, Opolon P, Heidmann T (2009) Syncytin-A knockout mice demonstrate the critical role in placentation of a fusogenic, endogenous retrovirus-derived, envelope gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:12127–12132
Tsujita Y, Muraski J, Shiraishi I, Kato T, Kajstura J, Anversa P, Sussman MA (2006) Nuclear targeting of Akt antagonizes aspects of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:11946–11951
Willkomm L, Schubert S, Jung R, Elsen M, Borde J, Gehlert S, Suhr F, Bloch W (2014) Lactate regulates myogenesis in C2C12 myoblasts in vitro. Stem Cell Res 12:742–753
Rychlik W, Spencer WJ, Rhoads RE (1990) Optimization of the annealing temperature for DNA amplification in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6409–6412
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Suhr, F. (2015). Detection of Fusion Events in Mammalian Skeletal Muscle. In: Pfannkuche, K. (eds) Cell Fusion. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1313. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2703-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2703-6_8
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2702-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2703-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols