Skip to main content

Application of Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis to Type Campylobacter jejuni

  • Protocol

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1301))

Abstract

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is generally accepted as one of the most discriminatory methods available for genotyping Campylobacter jejuni. PFGE has been extensively used in epidemiological studies, including outbreak investigation, persistence of genotypes in a human population, environmental diversity of sporadic infection isolates, dissemination of antibiotic-resistant strains, and comparison of genotypes within and between hosts. The main purpose of this chapter is to present a working PFGE protocol for those interested in incorporating this technique in their laboratories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Schwartz DC, Cantor CR (1984) Separation of yeast chromosome-sizes DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell 37:67–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Herschleb J, Ananiev G, Schwartz DC (2007) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Nat Protoc 2:677–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danna K, Nathans D (1971) Specific changes of simian virus 40 DNA by restriction endonuclease of Hemophilus influenzae. Proc Natl Acad Sci 68:2913–2917

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Swaminathan B, Barrett TJ, Hunter SB, Tauxe RV, The CDC PulseNet Task Force (2001) PulseNet: the molecular subtyping network for foodborne bacterial disease surveillance, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 7:382–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan W, Chang N, Taylor DE (1991) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli genomic DNA and its epidemiologic application. J Infect Dis 163:1068–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michaud S, Arbeit RD, Gaudreau C (2001) Molecular strain typing of Campylobacter jejuni by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in a single day. Can J Microbiol 47:667–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ribot EM, Fitzgerald C, Kubota K, Swaminathan B, Barrett TJ (2001) Rapid pulsed field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol 39:1889–1894

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous (2006) PulseNet Pathogens & Protocols. PulseNet. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/index.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2014

  9. Olsen SJ, Hansen GR, Bartlett L, Fitzgerald C, Sonder A, Manjrekar R, Riggs T, Kim J, Flahart R, Pezzino G, Swerdlow DL (2001) An outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni infections associated with food handler contamination: the use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Infect Dis 183:164–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sails AD, Swaminathan B, Fields PI (2003) Utility of multilocus sequence typing as an epidemiological tool for investigation of outbreaks of gastroenteritis caused by Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol 41:4733–4739

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilpin B, Cornelius A, Robson B, Boxall N, Ferguson A, Nicol C, Henderson T (2006) Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to identify potential outbreaks of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand. J Clin Microbiol 44:406–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitkanen T, Miettinen IT, Nakari UM, Takkinen J, Nieminen K, Siitonen A, Kuusi M, Holopainen A, Hanninen ML (2008) Faecal contamination of a municipal drinking water distribution system in association with Campylobacter jejuni infections. J Water Health 6:365–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petersen L, Wedderkopp A (2001) Evidence that certain clones of Campylobacter jejuni persist during successive broiler flock rotations. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2739–2745

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hakkinen M, Hanninen ML (2009) Shedding of Campylobacter spp. in Finnish cattle on dairy farms. J Appl Microbiol 107:898–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Uzunovic-Kamberovic S, Zorman T, Heyndrickx M, Mozina SS (2007) Role of poultry meat in sporadic Campylobacter infections in Bosnia and Herzegovina: laboratory-based study. Croat Med J 48:842–851

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bae W, Hancock DD, Call DR, Park YH, Berge AC, Finger RM, Sischo WM, Besser TE (2007) Dissemination of antimicrobial resistant strains of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni among cattle in Washington State and California. Vet Microbiol 122:306–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grundman H, Schneider C, Hartung D, Daschner FD, Pitt TL (1995) Discriminatory power of three DNA-based typing techniques for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol 33:528–534

    Google Scholar 

  18. Acke E, McGill K, Lawlor A, Jones BR, Fanning S, Whyte P (2010) Genetic diversity among Campylobacter jejuni isolates from pets in Ireland. Vet Rec 166:102–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons BN, Cody AJ, Porter CJ, Stavisky JH, Smith JL, Williams NJ, Leatherbarrow AJ, Hart CA, Gaskell RM, Dingle KE, Dawson S (2009) Typing of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from dogs by use of multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 47:3466–3471

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rozynek E, Antos-Bielska M, Dzierzanowska-Fangrat K, Szczepanska B, Trafny EA (2010) Genetic similarity of Campylobacter isolates in humans, food, and water sources in central Poland. Foodborne Pathog Dis 7:597–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Islam Z, van Belkum A, Wagenaar JA, Cody AJ, de Boer AG, Tabor H, Jacobs BC, Talukder KA, Endtz HP (2009) Comparative genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni strains from patients with Guillain-Barre´ syndrome in Bangladesh. PLoS One 4:e7257

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ge B, Girard W, Zhao S, Friedman S, Gaines SA, Meng J (2006) Genotyping of Campylobacter spp. from retail meats by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. J Appl Microbiol 100:175–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barrett TJ, Gerner-Smidt P, Swaminathan B (2006) Interpretation of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns in foodborne disease investigations and surveillance. Foodborne Pathog Dis 3:20–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hedberg CW, Smith KE, Besser JM, Boxrud DJ, Hennessy TW, Bender JB, Anderson FA, Osterholm MT, Olsen SJ, Fitzgerald C, Swerdlow DL (2001) Limitations of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for the routine surveillance of Campylobacter infections. J Infect Dis 184:242–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carle GC, Frank M, Olson MV (1986) Electrophoretic separation of large DNA molecules by periodic inversion of the electric field. Science 232:65–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chu G, Vollrath D, Davis RW (1986) Separation of large DNA molecules by contour clamped homogeneous electric field. Science 234:1582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oyarzabal OA, Macklin KS, Barbaree JM, Miller RS (2005) Evaluation of agar plates for direct enumeration of Campylobacter spp. from poultry carcass rinses. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(6):3351–3354

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. On SL, Nielsen EM, Engberg J, Madsen M (1998) Validity of SmaI-defined genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni examined by SalI, KpnI, and BamHI polymorphisms: Evidence of identical clones infecting humans, poultry, and cattle. Epidemiol Infect 120:231–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hook H, Fattah MA, Ericsson H, Vagsholm I, Danielsson-Tham ML (2005) Genotype dynamics of Campylobacter jejuni in a broiler flock. Vet Microbiol 106:109–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ronner AC, Borch E, Kaijser B (2005) Genetic profiling of Campylobacter jejuni strains from humans infected in Sweden or in Thailand, and from healthy Swedish chickens, studied by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Scand J Infect Dis 37:579–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson MK, Lane AB, Law BF, Miller WG, Joens LA, Konkel ME, White BA (2009) Analysis of the pan genome of Campylobacter jejuni isolates recovered from poultry by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) reveals different discriminatory capabilities. Microb Ecol 58:843–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oyarzabal OA, Backert S, Williams LL, Lastovica AJ, Miller RS, Pierce SJ, Vieira SL, Rebollo-Carrato F (2008) Molecular typing, serotyping and cytotoxicity testing of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from commercial broilers in Puerto Rico. J Appl Microbiol 105(3):800–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Anonymous (2013a) Alternative agaroses – results from external validation and recommendations, vol 3. PulseNet: Under the Microscope. PulseNet International. Available at http://www.pulsenetinternational.org/assets/PulseNet/uploads/Underthemicroscope/pulsenettipsvol3.pdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2014

  34. Anonymous (2013b) Alternate DNA stains – results and recommendations, vol 2. PulseNet: Under the Microscope. PulseNet International. Available at http://www.pulsenetinternational.org/assets/PulseNet/uploads/Underthemicroscope/pulsenettipsvol2.pdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2014

  35. Kusukawa N, Ostrovsky MV, Garner MM (1999) Effect of gelation conditions on the gel structure and resolving power of agarose-based DNA sequencing gels. Electrophoresis 20:1455–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ray M, Schwartz DC (2014) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and the molecular epidemiology of foodborne pathogens. In: Oyarzabal OA, Kathariou S (eds) DNA methods in food safety: molecular typing of foodborne and waterborne bacterial pathogens. Wiley Blackwell, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hanage WP, Aanensen DM (2009) Methods for data analysis. In: Caugant DA (ed) Molecular epidemiology of microorganisms, vol 551, Methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, New York, pp 287–304

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33:2233–2239

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. De Boer P, Duim B, Rigter A, van der Plas J, Jacobs-Reitsma W, Wagenaar JA (2000) Computer-assisted analysis and epidemiological value of genotyping methods for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Clin Microbiol 38:1940–1946

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. van Belkum A, Tassios PT, Dijkshoorn L, Haeggman S, Cookson B, Fry NK, Fussing V, Green J, Feil E, Gerner-Smidt P, Brisse S, Struelens M, The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group on Epidemiological Markers (ESGEM) (2007) Guidelines for the validation and application of typing methods for use in bacterial epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:1–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Oyarzabal OA (2012) Methods to type foodborne pathogens for epidemiological studies. In: Oyarzabal OA, Backert S (eds) Microbial food safety: an introduction. Springer, New York, NY, pp 57–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Oyarzabal OA, Williams A, Zhou P, Samadpour M (2013) Improved protocol for isolation of Campylobacter spp. from retail broiler meat and use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis for the typing of isolates. J Microbiol Methods 95:76–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gibson JR, Sutherland K, Owen RJ (1994) Inhibition of DNase activity in PFGE analysis of DNA from Campylobacter jejuni. Lett Appl Microbiol 19:357–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar A. Oyarzabal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Zhou, P., Oyarzabal, O.A. (2015). Application of Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis to Type Campylobacter jejuni . In: Jordan, K., Dalmasso, M. (eds) Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1301. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2599-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2599-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2599-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics