Advertisement

cAMP Signaling pp 117-129 | Cite as

Generation of Transgenic Mice Expressing FRET Biosensors

  • Daniela Hübscher
  • Viacheslav O. NikolaevEmail author
Protocol
  • 1.5k Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1294)

Abstract

Transgenic mice play a significant role in modern biomedical research. They allow not only mechanistic insights into the functions of specific genes and proteins. Recent strategies have also established the use of transgenic mice as an exciting tool for the expression and in vivo or in situ analysis of fluorescent biosensors, which are capable of directly reporting second messenger levels and biochemical processes in real time and in living cells. In this chapter, we present a detailed protocol for the generation of plasmid vectors and transgenic mice expressing a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensor for the second messenger 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate. These tools and techniques should provide great potential for the analysis of second messenger dynamics in a more physiologically relevant context.

Keywords

Transgenic mice FRET Cardiomyocyte cAMP Biosensor 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The work in authors’ laboratories is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants NI 1301/1, FOR 2060, SFB 1002 TP A01, IRTG 1816), the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), and the University of Göttingen Medical Center (“pro futura” grant).

References

  1. 1.
    Klohs J, Rudin M, Shimshek DR et al (2014) Imaging of cerebrovascular pathology in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 6:32CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zheng Y, Kong Y, Li F (2014) Kruppel-like transcription factor 11 (KLF11) overexpression inhibits cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 443:683–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levy E, Spahis S, Garofalo C et al (2014) Sar1b transgenic male mice are more susceptible to high-fat diet-induced obesity, insulin insensitivity and intestinal chylomicron overproduction. J Nutr Biochem 25:540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scharfenberger L, Hennerici T, Kiraly G et al (2014) Transgenic mouse technology in skin biology: generation of complete or tissue-specific knockout mice. J Invest Dermatol 134:e16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu C, Xie W, Gui C et al (2013) Pronuclear microinjection and oviduct transfer procedures for transgenic mouse production. Methods Mol Biol 1027:217–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon JW, Scangos GA, Plotkin DJ et al (1980) Genetic transformation of mouse embryos by microinjection of purified DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:7380–7384CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tian XL, Wang QK (2006) Generation of transgenic mice for cardiovascular research. Methods Mol Med 129:69–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lohse MJ, Bünemann M, Hoffmann C et al (2007) Monitoring receptor signaling by intramolecular FRET. Curr Opin Pharmacol 7:547–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nikolaev VO, Bünemann M, Schmitteckert E et al (2006) Cyclic AMP imaging in adult cardiac myocytes reveals far-reaching beta1-adrenergic but locally confined beta2-adrenergic receptor-mediated signaling. Circ Res 99:1084–1091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zaccolo M (2004) Use of chimeric fluorescent proteins and fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor cellular responses. Circ Res 94:866–873CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Börner S, Schwede F, Schlipp A et al (2011) FRET measurements of intracellular cAMP concentrations and cAMP analog permeability in intact cells. Nat Protoc 6:427–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nikolaev VO, Bunemann M, Hein L et al (2004) Novel single chain cAMP sensors for receptor-induced signal propagation. J Biol Chem 279:37215–37218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Calebiro D, Nikolaev VO, Gagliani MC et al (2009) Persistent cAMP-signals triggered by internalized G-protein-coupled receptors. PLoS Biol 7:e1000172CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niwa H, Yamamura K, Miyazaki J (1991) Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108:193–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cho A, Haruyama N, Kulkarni AB (2009) Generation of transgenic mice. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. Chapter: Unit–19.11. doi:  10.1002/0471143030.cb1911s42

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heart Research Center GöttingenUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Georg August University Medical CenterUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Experimental Cardiovascular ResearchUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations