Advertisement

A Novel Approach Combining Real-Time Imaging and the Patch-Clamp Technique to Calibrate FRET-Based Reporters for cAMP in Their Cellular Microenvironment

  • Andreas KoschinskiEmail author
  • Manuela Zaccolo
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1294)

Abstract

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based reporters are invaluable tools to study spatiotemporal aspects of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling and compartmentalization in living cells. These sensors allow estimation of relative changes of cAMP levels in real-time and intact cells. However, one of their major shortcomings is that they do not easily allow direct measurement of cAMP concentrations. This is mainly due to the fact that the methods to calibrate these sensors in their physiological microenvironment are not generally available. All published approaches to calibrate FRET-based reporters rely at least in part on data derived under nonphysiological conditions. Here, we present a protocol to calibrate FRET reporters completely “in cell.” We introduce a combination of FRET imaging of cAMP and the whole-cell patch-clamp techniques to microinfuse or dilute intracellular cAMP to known concentrations. This method represents a general tool to accurately estimate intracellular cAMP concentrations by allocating concentration values to FRET ratio changes.

Keywords

Imaging Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) cAMP FRET reporter calibration Patch clamp Microinfusion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported by the British Heart Foundation (PG/10/75/28537 and RG/12/3/29423) and the NSF-NIH CRCNS program (NIH R01 AA18060).

References

  1. 1.
    Miyawaki A, Llopis J, Heim R et al (1997) Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ based on green fluorescent proteins and Calmodulin. Nature 388:882–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams SR, Harootunian AT, Buechler YJ et al (1991) Fluorescence ratio imaging of cyclic AMP in single cells. Nature 349:694–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gesellchen F, Stangherlin A, Surdo N et al (2011) Measuring Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Cyclic AMP Signaling in Real-Time Using FRET-Based Biosensors. Methods Mol Biol 746:297–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Terrin A, Di Benedetto G, Pertegato V et al (2006) PGE(1) stimulation of HEK293 cells generates multiple contiguous domains with different [cAMP]: role of compartmentalized phosphodiesterases. J Cell Biol 175:441–451CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lefkimmiatis K, Leronni D, Hofer A (2013) The inner and outer compartments of mitochondria are sites of distinct cAMP/PKA signaling dynamics. J Cell Biol 202:453–462CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di Benedetto G, Zoccarato A, Lissandron V et al (2008) Protein kinase A type I and type II define distinct intracellular signaling compartments. Circ Res 103:836–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sin YY, Edwards HV, Li X et al (2011) Disruption of the cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4)-HSP20 complex attenuates the beta-agonist induced hypertrophic response in cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 50:872–883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herget S, Lohse MJ, Nikolaev VO (2008) Real-time monitoring of phosphodiesterase inhibition in intact cells. Cell Signal 20:1423–1431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Förster T (1948) Zwischenmolekulare Energie-wanderung und Fluoreszenz. Ann Phys 437:55–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stangherlin A, Koschinski A, Terrin A et al (2014) Analysis of compartmentalized cAMP: a method to compare signals from differently targeted FRET reporters. Methods Mol Biol 1071:59–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nikolaev VO, Bünemann M, Hein L et al (2004) Novel single chain cAMP sensors for receptor-induced signal propagation. J Biol Chem 279:37215–37218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Violin J, DiPilato LM, Yildirim N et al (2008) β2-adrenergic receptor signaling and desensitization elucidated by quantitative modeling of real time cAMP dynamics. J Biol Chem 283:2949–2961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lam A, St-Pierre F, Gong Y et al (2012) Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods 9(10):1005–1012CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beavo JA, Bechtel PJ, Krebs EG (1974) Activation of Protein Kinase by Physiological Concentrations of Cyclic AMP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71(9):3580–3583CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reimann EM, Walsh D, Krebs EG (1971) Purification and Properties of Rabbit Skeletal Muscle cAMP dependent Protein Kinases. J Biol Chem 246:1986–1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boerner S, Schwede F, Schlipp A et al (2011) FRET measurements of intracellular cAMP concentrations and cAMP analog permeability in intact cells. Nat Protoc 6:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E et al (1981) Improved Patch-Clamp Techniques for High-Resolution Current Recording from Cells and Cell-Free Membrane Patches. Pflugers Arch 391:85–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rink TJ, Tsien RY, Pozzan T (1982) Cytoplasmic pH and free Mg2+ in lymphocytes. J Cell Biol 95:189–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buckler KJ, Vaughan-Jones RD (1990) Application of a new pH-sensitive fluoroprobe (carboxy-SNARF-1) for intracellular pH measurement in small, isolated cells. Pflugers Arch 417:234–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zaccolo M, De Giorgi F, Cho CY et al (2000) A genetically encoded fluorescent indicator for cyclic AMP in living cells. Nat Cell Biol 2:25–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Llopis, J., McCaffery, J. M., Miyawaki, A., et al (1998) Measurement of cytosolic, mitochondrial, and Golgi pH in single living cells with green fluorescent proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95, 6803–6808dGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thomas JA, Buchsbaum RN, Zimniak A et al (1979) Intracellular pH-measurements in Ehrlich Ascites tumor cells utilizing spectroscopic probes generated in situ. Biochemistry 18(11):2210–2218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wachter RM, Remington SJ (1999) Sensitivity of the yellow variant of green fluorescent protein to halides and nitrate. Curr Biol 9:628–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Felber LM, Cloutier SM, Kündig C et al (2004) Evaluation of the CFP-substrate-YFP system for protease studies: advantages and limitations. Biotechniques 36:878–885PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Evellin S, Mongillo M, Terrin A et al (2004) Measuring dynamic changes in cAMP using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Methods Mol Biol 284:259–270PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and GeneticsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations