Skip to main content

Qualitative Research in Clinical Epidemiology

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Book cover Clinical Epidemiology

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1281))

  • 4499 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter has been written to specifically address the usefulness of qualitative research for the practice of clinical epidemiology. The methods of grounded theory to facilitate understanding of human behavior and construction of monitoring scales for use in quantitative studies are discussed. In end-stage renal disease patients receiving long-term hemodialysis, a qualitative study used grounded theory to generate a multilayered classification system, which culminated in a substantive theory on living with end-stage renal disease and hemodialysis. The qualitative data base was re-visited for the purpose of scale development and led to the Patient Perception of Hemodialysis Scale (PPHS). The quantitative study confirmed that the PPHS was psychometrically valid and reliable and supported the major premises of the substantive theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jones R (2007) Strength of evidence in qualitative research. J Clin Epidemiol 60:321–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poses RM, Isen AM (1998) Qualitative research in medicine and health care questions and controversy. J Gen Intern Med 13(1):32–38

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G (1998) Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 8(3):341–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL (2001) Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 11(4):522–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Meth 1(2):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horsburgh D (2003) Evaluation of qualitative research. J Clin Nurs 12:307–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rolfe G (2006) Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 53(3):304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glaser B, Strauss A (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology, Mill Valley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glaser BG (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology, Mill Valley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morse JM, Field PA (1996) Nursing research: the application of qualitative approaches. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilde B, Starrin B, Larsson G, Larsson M (1993) Quality of care from the patient perspective: a grounded theory study. Scand J Caring Sci 7(2):113–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M (1989) The medical outcomes study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 262(7):925–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paget L, Tarlov AR (1996) The medical outcomes trust: improving medical outcomes from the patient’s point of view. J Outcome Manage 3(3):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrans C, Powers MJ (1993) Quality of life of hemodialysis patients. Psychometric assessment of the quality of life index. Am Neph Nur Assoc J 20(5):575–582

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah M. Gregory .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Gregory, D.M., Way, C.Y. (2015). Qualitative Research in Clinical Epidemiology. In: Parfrey, P., Barrett, B. (eds) Clinical Epidemiology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1281. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2427-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2428-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics