Skip to main content

On Framing the Research Question and Choosing the Appropriate Research Design

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Book cover Clinical Epidemiology

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1281))

Abstract

Clinical epidemiology is the science of human disease investigation with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. The generation of a reasonable question requires definition of patients, interventions, controls, and outcomes. The goal of research design is to minimize error, to ensure adequate samples, to measure input and output variables appropriately, to consider external and internal validities, to limit bias, and to address clinical as well as statistical relevance. The hierarchy of evidence for clinical decision-making places randomized controlled trials (RCT) or systematic review of good quality RCTs at the top of the evidence pyramid. Prognostic and etiologic questions are best addressed with longitudinal cohort studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chertow GM, Moe SM (2005) Calcification or classification? J Am Soc Nephrol 16:293–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Gotch FA et al (1997) Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study. Kidney Int 52:1395–1405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright JT Jr, Kusek JW, Toto RD et al (1996) Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) Pilot Study. Control Clin Trials 17:3S–16S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorpe LE, Gwynn RC, Mandel-Ricci J et al (2006) Study design and participation rates of the New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Prev Chronic Dis 3:A94

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robbins JM, Vaccarino V, Zhang H, Kasl SV (2000) Excess type 2 diabetes in African-American women and men aged 40-74 and socioeconomic status: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 54:839–845

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Julious SA (2004) Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med 23:1921–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eknoyan G, Hostetter T, Bakris GL et al (2003) Proteinuria and other markers of chronic kidney disease: a position statement of the national kidney foundation (NKF) and the national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases (NIDDK). Am J Kidney Dis 42:617–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manns B, Owen WF Jr, Winkelmayer WC, Devereaux PJ, Tonelli M (2006) Surrogate markers in clinical studies: problems solved or created? Am J Kidney Dis 48:159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Viera AJ, Bangdiwala SI (2007) Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking. Fam Med 39:132–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp. Accessed 23 Mar 2007

  11. Sibbald B, Roberts C (1998) Understanding controlled trials: crossover trials. BMJ 316:1719

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Antman EM, Grudzien C, Sacks DB (1995) Evaluation of a rapid bedside assay for detection of serum cardiac troponin T. JAMA 273:1279–1282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1991) The interpretation of diagnostic data. In: Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (eds) Clinical Epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. Little, Brown and Company, Toronto, CA, pp 117–119

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alp NJ, Bell JA, Shahi M (2001) A rapid troponin-I-based protocol for assessing acute chest pain. QJM 94:687–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. www.equator-network.org. Accessed 4 Apr 2014

  16. http://www.consort-statement.org. Accessed 4 Apr 2014

  17. http://www.strobe-statement.org. Accessed 4 Apr 2014

  18. http://prisma-statement.org. Accessed 4 Apr 2014

  19. Ravani P, Parfrey PS, Curtis B, Barrett BJ (2007) Clinical research of kidney diseases I: researchable questions and valid answers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:3681–3690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravani P, Parfrey PS, Dicks E, Barrett BJ (2007) Clinical research of kidney diseases II: problems of research design. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:2785–2794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Ravani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Parfrey, P.S., Ravani, P. (2015). On Framing the Research Question and Choosing the Appropriate Research Design. In: Parfrey, P., Barrett, B. (eds) Clinical Epidemiology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1281. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2427-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2428-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics