Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of how healthcare institution could benefit from the usage of technologies and personal health systems. Clinical, Usage and Technical data are mined in different ways and with different methods to support users (patients, health professionals and informal caregivers) in taking decisions. As a case study, the solutions and the techniques adopted in a research project focused on the delivery of technologies to improve diabetes management are described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Results are currently under analysis.
References
Abdelsalam H et al (2009) Smart home-based health. J Diabetes Sci Technol 3(1):141–148
Synnot J (2012) Flexible and customizable visualization of data generated within intelligent environments. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012:5819–5822. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347317
Shahar Y et al (2003) Interactive visualization and exploration of time-oriented clinical data using a distributed temporal-abstraction architecture. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003: 1004
Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ et al. (2011) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD001431
The salzburg statement on shared decision making, Salzburg Global Seminar, 7th February 2011
Marinov M, Mohammad Mosa AS, Yoo I, Austin BS (2011) Data-mining technologies for diabetes: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5(6):1549–1556
Bellazzi R, Abu-Hanna A (2009) Data mining technologies for blood glucose and diabetes management. J Diabetes Sci Technol 3(3):603–612
Bellazzi R, Magni P, Larizza C, De Nicolao G, Riva A, Stefanelli M (1998) Mining biomedical time series by combining structural analysis and temporal abstractions. Proc AMIA Symp 1998: 160–164
Breault JL, Goodall CR, Fos PJ (2002) Data mining a diabetic data warehouse. Artif Intell Med 26(1–2):37–54
Huang Y, McCullagh P, Black N, Harper R (2007) Feature selection and classification model construction on type 2 diabetic patients’ data. Artif Intell Med 41(3):251–262
Miyaki K, Takei I, Watanabe K, Nakashima H, Omae K (2002) Novel statistical classification model of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients for tailor-made prevention using data mining algorithm. J Epidemiol 12(3):243–248
Brown AC, Olver WI, Donnelly CJ, May ME, Naggert JK, Shaffer DJ, Roopenian DC (2005) Searching QTL by gene expression: analysis of diabesity. BMC Genet 6:12
Covani U, Marconcini S, Derchi G, Barone A, Giacomelli L (2009) Relationship between human periodontitis and type 2 diabetes at a genomic level: a data-mining study. J Periodontol 80(8):1265–1273
DuMouchel W, Fram D, Yang X, Mahmoud RA, Grogg AL, Engelhart L, Ramaswamy K (2008) Antipsychotics, glycemic disorders, and life-threatening diabetic events: a Bayesian data-mining analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (1968-2004). Ann Clin Psychiatry 20(1):21–31
Liou FM, Tang YC, Chen JY (2008) Detecting hospital fraud and claim abuse through diabetic outpatient services. Health Care Manag Sci 11(4):353–358
Richards G, Rayward-Smith VJ, Sönksen PH, Carey S, Weng C (2001) Data mining for indicators of early mortality in a database of clinical records. Artif Intell Med 22(3): 215–231
Toussi M, Lamy JB, Le Toumelin P, Venot A (2009) Using data mining techniques to explore physicians’ therapeutic decisions when clinical guidelines do not provide recommendations: methods and example for type 2 diabetes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 9:28
European Commission. Information Society Technologies Program. METABO project. Chronic diseases related to metabolic disorders. ICT-26270. www.metabo-eu.org
America Diabetes Association (2008) Standards of medical care in diabetes-2008. Diabetes Care 31(1):S12–S54
Carey, M. P., Jorgensen, R. S., Weinstock, R. S., Sprafkin, R. P., Lantinga, L. J., Carnrike, C. L. M., Jr., Baker, M. T., & Meisler, A. W. (1991). Reliability and validity of the appraisal of diabetes scale. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 43–51.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, September 1989, 319–339.
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff.: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In J. Ziegler, & G. Szwillus, (Hrsg.), Mensch & Computer 2003 (S. 187-196). Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.
Boy, O., Ohmann, C., Aust, B., Eich, H.P., Koller, M., Knode, O., Nolte, U. (2000). Systematische Evaluierung der Anwenderzufriedenheit von Ärzten mit einem Krankenhausinformationssystem – Erste Ergebnisse. In: Hasman, A. et al. (Eds.). Medical Infobahn for Europe: proceedings of MIE2000 and GMD2000. IOS Press. Pp. 518-522
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media, New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Fico, G., Arredondo, M.T., Protopappas, V., Georgia, E., Fotiadis, D. (2015). Mining Data When Technology Is Applied to Support Patients and Professional on the Control of Chronic Diseases: The Experience of the METABO Platform for Diabetes Management. In: Fernández-Llatas, C., García-Gómez, J. (eds) Data Mining in Clinical Medicine. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1246. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1985-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1985-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1984-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1985-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols