Abstract
This chapter describes approaches for using computational modeling of synthetic biology perturbations to analyze endogenous biological circuits, with a particular focus on signaling and metabolic pathways. We describe a bottom-up approach in which ordinary differential equations are constructed to model the core interactions of a pathway of interest. We then discuss methods for modeling synthetic perturbations that can be used to investigate properties of the natural circuit. Keeping in mind the importance of the interplay between modeling and experimentation, we next describe experimental methods for constructing synthetic perturbations to test the computational predictions. Finally, we present a case study of the p53 tumor-suppressor pathway, illustrating the process of modeling the core network, designing informative synthetic perturbations in silico, and testing the predictions in vivo.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Elowitz MB, Leibler S (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403(6767):335–338. doi:10.1038/35002125
Benenson Y (2012) Biomolecular computing systems: principles, progress and potential. Nat Rev Genet 13(7):455–468. doi:10.1038/nrg3197
Atkinson MR, Savageau MA, Myers JT, Ninfa AJ (2003) Development of genetic circuitry exhibiting toggle switch or oscillatory behavior in Escherichia coli. Cell 113(5):597–607. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00346-5
Stricker J, Cookson S, Bennett MR, Mather WH, Tsimring LS, Hasty J (2008) A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator. Nature 456(7221):516–519. doi:10.1038/nature07389
Nguyen QT, Merlo ME, Medema MH, Jankevics A, Breitling R, Takano E (2012) Metabolomics methods for the synthetic biology of secondary metabolism. FEBS Lett 586(15):2177–2183. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2012.02.008
Keasling JD (2012) Synthetic biology and the development of tools for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 14(3):189–195. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2012.01.004
Lee WP, Tzou WS (2009) Computational methods for discovering gene networks from expression data. Brief Bioinform 10(4):408–423. doi:10.1093/bib/bbp028
Chen WW, Niepel M, Sorger PK (2010) Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions. Genes Dev 24(17):1861–1875. doi:10.1101/gad.1945410
Mallavarapu A, Thomson M, Ullian B, Gunawardena J (2009) Programming with models: modularity and abstraction provide powerful capabilities for systems biology. J R Soc Interface 6(32):257–270. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0205
Hlavacek WS, Faeder JR, Blinov ML, Posner RG, Hucka M, Fontana W (2006) Rules for modeling signal-transduction systems. Sci STKE 2006 (344):re6. doi:10.1126/stke.3442006re6
Danos V, Feret J, Fontana W, Harmer R, Krivine J (2008) Rule-based modeling, symmetries, refinements. In: Formal methods in systems biology, vol 5054, Lecture notes in bioinformatics 2008. Springer, Berlin, pp 103–122
Meier-Schellersheim M, Xu X, Angermann B, Kunkel EJ, Jin T, Germain RN (2006) Key role of local regulation in chemosensing revealed by a new molecular interaction-based modeling method. PLoS Comput Biol 2(7):e82. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020082
Lopez CF, Muhlich JL, Bachman JA, Sorger PK (2013) Programming biological models in Python using PySB. Mol Syst Biol 9:646. doi:10.1038/msb.2013.1
Alon U (2007) Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 8(6):450–461. doi:10.1038/nrg2102
Murphy KC (2012) Phage recombinases and their applications. Adv Virus Res 83:367–414. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394438-2.00008-6
Turan S, Zehe C, Kuehle J, Qiao J, Bode J (2012) Recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE)—a rapidly-expanding toolbox for targeted genomic modifications. Gene 515(1):1–27. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2012.11.016
Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF 3rd (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31(7):397–405. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004
Terpe K (2006) Overview of bacterial expression systems for heterologous protein production: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(2):211–222. doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0465-8
Maya D, Quintero MJ, de la Cruz Munoz-Centeno M, Chavez S (2008) Systems for applied gene control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 30(6):979–987. doi:10.1007/s10529-008-9647-z
Gossen M, Bujard H (1992) Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89(12):5547–5551
Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC (1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391(6669):806–811. doi:10.1038/35888
Rogers S, Wells R, Rechsteiner M (1986) Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. Science 234(4774):364–368
Grilly C, Stricker J, Pang WL, Bennett MR, Hasty J (2007) A synthetic gene network for tuning protein degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Syst Biol 3:127. doi:10.1038/msb4100168
Bashor CJ, Helman NC, Yan S, Lim WA (2008) Using engineered scaffold interactions to reshape MAP kinase pathway signaling dynamics. Science 319(5869):1539–1543. doi:10.1126/science.1151153
Szobota S, McKenzie C, Janovjak H (2013) Optical control of ligand-gated ion channels. Methods Mol Biol 998:417–435. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-351-0_32
Wu YI, Frey D, Lungu OI, Jaehrig A, Schlichting I, Kuhlman B, Hahn KM (2009) A genetically encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells. Nature 461(7260):104–108. doi:10.1038/nature08241
Riley T, Sontag E, Chen P, Levine A (2008) Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(5):402–412
Geva-Zatorsky N, Rosenfeld N, Itzkovitz S, Milo R, Sigal A, Dekel E, Yarnitzky T, Liron Y, Polak P, Lahav G, Alon U (2006) Oscillations and variability in the p53 system. Mol Syst Biol 2(2006):0033
Toettcher JE, Mock C, Batchelor E, Loewer A, Lahav G (2010) A synthetic-natural hybrid oscillator in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(39):17047–17052. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005615107
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Porter, J.R., Batchelor, E. (2015). Using Computational Modeling and Experimental Synthetic Perturbations to Probe Biological Circuits. In: Marchisio, M. (eds) Computational Methods in Synthetic Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1244. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1878-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1878-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1877-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1878-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols