Latest major contributions in the field of sepsis diagnostics result from advances in PCR technologies permitting new standards in speed and quality, given the fact that a timely diagnosis is the decisive factor to the survival of patients with bloodstream infections.
Multiplex real-time PCR is a quantitative method for simultaneous amplification and detection of different targeted DNA molecules within hours. Nevertheless, various studies have shown a number of technical shortcomings as well as a high heterogeneity in sensitivity.
The present method allows the standardized and rapid detection and identification of 25 common bacteria and fungi responsible for bloodstream infections from whole blood samples by using LightCycler® SeptiFast (LC-SF) test, based on real-time PCR.
Multiplex real-time PCR Polymerase chain reaction LightCycler SeptiFast test Bloodstream infection Whole blood Rapid diagnosis Sepsis MagNA pure compact instrument
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
Degoricija V, Sharma M, Legac A et al (2006) Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: Impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy. Croat Med J 47: 385–397PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE et al (2006) Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:1589–1596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Book M, Lehmann LE, Zhang XH et al (2013) Monitoring infection: from blood culture to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 27:279–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels R (2011) Surviving the first hours in sepsis: getting the basics right (an intensivist’s perspective). J Antimicrob Chemother 66 (Suppl 2):ii11–ii23PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lehmann LE, Hunfeld K-P, Steinbrucker M et al (2010) Improved detection of blood stream pathogens by real-time PCR in severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 36(1):49–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann LE, Hunfeld K-P, Emrich T et al (2008) A multiplex real-time PCR assay for rapid detection and differentiation of 25 bacterial and fungal pathogens from whole blood samples. Med Microbiol Immunol 197(3): 313–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regueiro B, Varela E, Martinez-Lamas M et al (2008) Automation of Septifast® for molecular diagnosis of infection in septic patients. Crit Care 12(Suppl 5):P12CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Wolk DM, Fiorello AB (2010) Code sepsis: rapid methods to diagnose sepsis and detect hematopathogens. Part II: challenges to the laboratory diagnosis of sepsis. Clin Microbiol Newslett 32(6):42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissari P, Zumla A, Tarkka E et al (2010) Accurate and rapid identification of bacterial species from positive blood cultures with a DNA-based microarray platform: an observational study. Lancet 375:224–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi H, Oethinger M, Tuohy MJ et al (2009) Limiting false-positive polymerase chain reaction results: detection of DNA and mRNA to differentiate viable from dead bacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 64:445–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini N, Clerici D, Diotti R et al (2008) Molecular diagnosis of sepsis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. J Med Microbiol 57:601–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Lehmann LE, Raadts AD et al (2009) Utility of a commercially available multiplex real-time PCR assay to detect bacterial and fungal pathogens in febrile neutropenia. J Clin Microbiol 47:2405–2410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussap M, Molinari MP, Senno E et al (2007) New diagnostic tools for neonatal sepsis: the role of a real-time polymerase chain reaction for the early detection and identification of bacterial and fungal species in blood samples. J Chemother 19(Suppl 2):31–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
Louie RF, Tang Z, Albertson (2008) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction detection enhancement of bacteremia and fungemia. Crit Care Med 36:1487–1492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar