Advertisement

Sepsis pp 1-4 | Cite as

Microbiological Diagnosis of Sepsis: The Confounding Effects of a “Gold Standard”

  • Nicasio ManciniEmail author
  • Roberto Burioni
  • Massimo Clementi
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1237)

Abstract

The need of rapid and sensitive diagnostic techniques for sepsis is every day more compelling. Its morbidity and mortality loads are dramatically high, with one quarter of patients eventually dying. Several diagnostic progresses have been made in the last years using both molecular- and nonmolecular-based approaches, and they have to be broadly shared in the scientific community also under the technical point of view. The initial chapters of this book give a thorough overlook of the state of the art in the actual diagnosis of sepsis. The other chapters provide a broad range of protocols describing both already used and futuristic tools, covering both microbiological and nonmicrobiological aspects. The potential role of each described protocol is evidenced by a brief introduction on the specific topic of each chapter. A final chapter describing algorithms potentially useful in stratifying the risk of sepsis in each single patient and suggesting the future perspectives in the diagnosis of sepsis closes the book.

Key words

Blood culture Mass spectrometry Molecular-based assays Nonmolecular biomarkers 

References

  1. 1.
    Melamed A, Sorvillo FJ (2009) The burden of sepsis-associated mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2005: an analysis of multiple-cause-of-death data. Crit Care 13(1):R28PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin GS et al (2003) The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 348(16):1546–1554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ginde AA et al (2013) Impact of older age and nursing home residence on clinical outcomes of US emergency department visits for severe sepsis. J Crit Care 28:606–611. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.03.018 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lagu T et al (2012) What is the best method for estimating the burden of severe sepsis in the United States? J Crit Care 27(4):414, e1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall MJ et al (2011) Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS Data Brief 62:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang HE et al (2007) National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med 35(8):1928–1936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dombrovskiy VY et al (2007) Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med 35(5):1244–1250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dellinger RP et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock—2012. Crit Care Med 41(2):580–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conde KA et al (2013) Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in brazil: a multicenter observational study. PLoS One 8(6):e64790PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cornaglia G, Giamarellou H, Rossolini GM (2011) Metallo-beta-lactamases: a last frontier for beta-lactams? Lancet Infect Dis 11(5):381–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calfee DP (2012) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and other Gram-positives in healthcare. Curr Opin Infect Dis 25(4):385–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yezli S, Li H (2012) Antibiotic resistance amongst healthcare-associated pathogens in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents 40(5):389–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burchardi H, Schneider H (2004) Economic aspects of severe sepsis: a review of intensive care unit costs, cost of illness and cost effectiveness of therapy. Pharmacoeconomics 22(12):793–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moerer O et al (2007) A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units. Crit Care 11(3):R69PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chalupka AN, Talmor D (2012) The economics of sepsis. Crit Care Clin 28(1):57–76, viPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mancini N et al (2010) The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev 23(1):235–251PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reinhart K et al (2012) New approaches to sepsis: molecular diagnostics and biomarkers. Clin Microbiol Rev 25(4):609–634PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray PR, Masur H (2012) Current approaches to the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 40(12):3277–3282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mancini N et al (2008) Molecular diagnosis of sepsis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. J Med Microbiol 57(Pt 5):601–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mancini N et al (2009) Molecular diagnosis of polymicrobial sepsis. J Clin Microbiol 47(4):1274–1275PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mancini N et al (2012) Potential role of the detection of enterobacterial DNA in blood for the management of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. J Med Microbiol 61(Pt 10): 1465–1472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicasio Mancini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roberto Burioni
    • 1
  • Massimo Clementi
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Microbiology and VirologyUniversity Vita-Salute San RaffaeleMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations