The fruit fly is an excellent model system for investigating the sequence of epithelial tissue invaginations constituting the process of gastrulation. By combining recent advancements in light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) and image processing, the three-dimensional fly embryo morphology and relevant gene expression patterns can be accurately recorded throughout the entire process of embryogenesis. LSFM provides exceptionally high imaging speed, high signal-to-noise ratio, low level of photoinduced damage, and good optical penetration depth. This powerful combination of capabilities makes LSFM particularly suitable for live imaging of the fly embryo.
The resulting high-information-content image data are subsequently processed to obtain the outlines of cells and cell nuclei, as well as the geometry of the whole embryo tissue by image segmentation. Furthermore, morphodynamics information is extracted by computationally tracking objects in the image. Towards that goal we describe the successful implementation of a fast fitting strategy of Gaussian mixture models.
The data obtained by image processing is well-suited for hypothesis testing of the detailed biomechanics of the gastrulating embryo. Typically this involves constructing computational mechanics models that consist of an objective function providing an estimate of strain energy for a given morphological configuration of the tissue, and a numerical minimization mechanism of this energy, achieved by varying morphological parameters.
In this chapter, we provide an overview of in vivo imaging of fruit fly embryos using LSFM, computational tools suitable for processing the resulting images, and examples of computational biomechanical simulations of fly embryo gastrulation.
Light sheet microscopy Computational modeling Tissue biomechanics Live imaging Quantitative developmental biology Drosophila melanogasterEmbryonic development Image processing
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Xu C, Prince J (1998) Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Proc 7(3):359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin G et al (2003) A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks. Cytometry A 56(1):23–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour A et al (2005) Segmenting and tracking fluorescent cells in dynamic 3-D microscopy with coupled active surfaces. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(9):1396–1410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pop S et al (2013) Extracting 3D cell parameters from dense tissue environments: application to the development of the mouse heart. Bioinformatics 29(6):772–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smal I et al (2008) Multiple object tracking in molecular bioimaging by Rao-Blackwellized marginal particle filtering. Med Image Anal 12(6):764–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kausler BX et al (2012) A discrete chain graph model for 3D + t cell tracking with high misdirection robustness. In: Fitzgibbon A et al (eds) Computer vision - ECCV 2012. Springer, Berlin, pp 144–157. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33712-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelbart MA et al (2012) Volume conservation principle involved in cell lengthening and nucleus movement during tissue morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(47):19298–19303PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar