Skip to main content

Chromosome Painting of Mouse Peripheral Blood and Spleen Tissues

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Genotoxicity and DNA Repair

Abstract

Exposure to genotoxins may induce both structural and numerical chromosome aberrations. Whole chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of metaphase cells provides a means for analyzing chromosome aberrations with single-cell level resolution. The laboratory mouse model is an essential tool for in vivo genotoxicity studies. However, few published resources are available that provide a comprehensive background and instructions on how to perform whole chromosome FISH on mouse metaphase cells. Here, we consolidate several techniques into a single, comprehensive protocol describing the preparation of mouse metaphase cells for whole chromosome FISH analysis. Also presented are basic recommendations on how to visualize the slides and how to organize the data for analysis and interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ceppi M, Gallo F, Bonassi S (2011) Study design and statistical analysis of data in human population studies with the micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 26(1):247–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feneh M, Bonassi S (2011) The effect of age, gender, diet and lifestyle on DNA damage measured using micronucleus frequency in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutagenesis 26(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mateuca R, Lombaert N, Aka PV et al (2006) Chromosomal changes: induction, detection methods and applicability in human biomonitoring. Biochimie 88(11):1515–1531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballarini F, Ottolenghi A (2004) Models of chromosome aberration induction: an example based on radiation track structure. Cytogenet Genome Res 104(1–4):149–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey SM, Bedford JS (2006) Studies on chromosome aberration induction: what can they tell us about DNA repair? DNA Repair (Amst) 5(9–10):1171–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tucker JD, Marples B, Ramsey MJ et al (2004) Persistence of chromosome aberrations in mice acutely exposed to 56Fe+26 ions. Radiat Res 161(6):648–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Breneman JW, Swiger RR, Ramsey MJ et al (1995) The development of painting probes for dual-color and multiple chromosome analysis in the mouse. Cytogenet Cell Genet 68(3–4):197–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tucker JD (2010) Chromosome translocations and assessing human exposure to adverse environmental agents. Environ Mol Mutagen 51(8–9):815–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tucker JD, Christensen ML (1987) Effects of anticoagulants upon sister-chromatid exchanges, cell-cycle kinetics, and mitotic index in human peripheral lymphocytes. Mutat Res 190(3):225–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delano MD (1995) Simple physical constraints in hemolysis. J Theor Biol 175(4): 517–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Claussen U, Michel S, Mühlig P et al (2002) Demystifying chromosome preparation and the implications for the concept of chromosome condensation during mitosis. Cytogenet Genome Res 98(2–3):136–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deng W, Tsao SW, Lucas JN et al (2003) A new method for improving metaphase chromosome spreading. Cytometry A 51(1): 46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Lowe Wright L et al (2001) Improvements in cytogenetic slide preparation: controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing. Cytometry 43(2):101–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petibone DM, Morris SM, Hotchkiss CE et al (2008) Technique for culturing Macaca mulatta peripheral blood lymphocytes for fluorescence in situ hybridization of whole chromosome paints. Mutat Res 653(1–2):76–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tucker JD, Morgan WF, Awa AA et al (1995) PAINT: a proposed nomenclature for structural aberrations detected by whole chromosome painting. Mutat Res 347(1):21–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tucker JD, Morgan WF, Awa AA et al (1995) A proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet 68(3–4):211–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lucas JN, Tenjin T, Straume T et al (1989) Rapid human chromosome aberration analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int J Radiat Biol 56(1):35–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L, Rothman N, Wang Y et al (1999) Benzene increases aneuploidy in the lymphocytes of exposed workers: a comparison of data obtained by fluorescence in situ hybridization in interphase and metaphase cells. Environ Mol Mutagen 34(4):260–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith MT, Zhang L, Wang Y et al (1998) Increased translocations and aneusomy in chromosomes 8 and 21 among workers exposed to benzene. Cancer Res 58(10): 2176–2181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Declaration

The views presented in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dayton M. Petibone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Petibone, D.M., Tucker, J.D., Morris, S.M. (2014). Chromosome Painting of Mouse Peripheral Blood and Spleen Tissues. In: Sierra, L., Gaivão, I. (eds) Genotoxicity and DNA Repair. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1068-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1068-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1067-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1068-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics