Abstract
The MIQE (minimum information for the publication of quantitative real-time PCR) guidelines were published in 2009 with the twin aims of providing a blueprint for good real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay design and encouraging the comprehensive reporting of qPCR protocols. It had become increasingly clear that variable pre-assay conditions, poor assay design, and incorrect data analysis were leading to the routine publication of data that were often inconsistent, inaccurate, and wrong. The problem was exacerbated by a lack of transparency of reporting, with the details of technical information inadequate for the purpose of assessing the validity of published qPCR data. This had, and continues to have serious implications for basic research, reducing the potential for translating findings into valuable applications and potentially devastating consequences for clinical practice. Today, the rationale underlying the MIQE guidelines has become widely accepted, with more than 2,200 citations by March 2014 and editorials in Nature and related publications acknowledging the enormity of the problem. However, the problem we now face is rather serious: thousands of publications that report suspect data are populating and corrupting the peer-reviewed scientific literature. It will be some time before the many contradictions apparent in every area of the life sciences are corrected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA et al (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622
Bustin SA (2013) Why there is no link between measles virus and autism. In: Fitzgerald M (ed) Recent advances in autism spectrum disorders, vol I, Intech. Rijeka, Croatia, pp 81–98
Kakisi OK, Robinson MJ, Tettmar KI et al (2013) The rise and fall of XMRV. Transfus Med 23:142–151
Roehr B (2012) Researchers find no link between XMRV and chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ 345:e6331
Bohlenius H, Eriksson S, Parcy F et al (2007) Retraction. Science 316:367
Bustin SA (2010) Why the need for qPCR publication guidelines?—The case for MIQE. Methods 50:217–226
Abdel Nour AM, Pfaffl M (2011) Apple store, apple https://itunes.apple.com/app/miqeqpcr/id423650002?mt=8 or https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.biorad.miqeqPCR
Anonymous (2013) Announcement: reducing our irreproducibility. Nature 496:398
Shaffer C (2010) Routine lab method’s accuracy called into question. Nat Med 16:349
Marx V (2013) PCR: living life amplified and standardized. Nat Methods 10:391–395
Bustin SA, Beaulieu JF, Huggett J et al (2010) MIQE precis: practical implementation of minimum standard guidelines for fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR experiments. BMC Mol Biol 11:74
Huggett JF, Foy CA, Benes V et al (2013) The digital MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative digital PCR experiments. Clin Chem 59:892–902
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA et al (2011) Primer sequence disclosure: a clarification of the MIQE guidelines. Clin Chem 57:919–921
Stahlberg A, Hakansson J, Xian X et al (2004) Properties of the reverse transcription reaction in mRNA quantification. Clin Chem 50: 509–515
Stahlberg A, Kubista M, Pfaffl M (2004) Comparison of reverse transcriptases in gene expression analysis. Clin Chem 50: 1678–1680
Nolan T, Hands RE, Ogunkolade BW et al (2006) SPUD: a qPCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal Biochem 351:308–310
Huggett JF, Novak T, Garson JA et al (2008) Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon. BMC Res Notes 1:70
Bustin SA (2000) Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol 25:169–193
Huggett J, Bustin SA (2011) Standardisation and reporting for nucleic acid quantification. Accredit Qual Assur 16:399–405
Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S et al (2005) Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 6:279–284
Tricarico C, Pinzani P, Bianchi S et al (2002) Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction: normalization to rRNA or single housekeeping genes is inappropriate for human tissue biopsies. Anal Biochem 309:293–300
Dheda K, Huggett JF, Chang JS et al (2005) The implications of using an inappropriate reference gene for real-time reverse transcription PCR data normalization. Anal Biochem 344: 141–143
Bustin SA, Mueller R (2005) Real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and its potential use in clinical diagnosis. Clin Sci (Lond) 109: 365–379
Kubista M, Andrade JM, Bengtsson M et al (2006) The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med 27:95–125
Levesque-Sergerie JP, Duquette M, Thibault C et al (2007) Detection limits of several commercial reverse transcriptase enzymes: impact on the low- and high-abundance transcript levels assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. BMC Mol Biol 8:93
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson J et al (2013) The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature. Nat Methods 10:1063–1067
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Johnson, G., Nour, A.A., Nolan, T., Huggett, J., Bustin, S. (2014). Minimum Information Necessary for Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. In: Biassoni, R., Raso, A. (eds) Quantitative Real-Time PCR. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1160. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0733-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0733-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0732-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0733-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols