Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Human Fertility pp 475–499Cite as

Detection of Monogenic Disorders and Chromosome Aberrations by Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

  • 4001 Accesses

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1154))

Abstract

This chapter highlights the methodologies of single cell genetic diagnosis along with the strengths and weaknesses of existing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Mullis KB, Faloona FA (1987) Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Meth Enzymol 155:335–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM (1990) Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 344:768–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Handyside AH, Xu K (2012) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis comes of age. Semin Reprod Med 30:255–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kan YW, Dozy AM (1978) Antenatal diagnosis of sickle-cell anaemia by D.N.A. analysis of amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet 2:910–912

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu K, Shi ZM, Veeck LL, Hughes MR, Rosenwaks Z (1999) First unaffected pregnancy using preimplantation genetic diagnosis for sickle cell anemia. JAMA 281:1701–1706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Handyside AH, Lesko JG, Tarin JJ, Winston RM, Hughes MR (1992) Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. New Engl J Med 327:905–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Findlay I, Ray P, Quirke P, Rutherford A, Lilford R (1995) Allelic drop-out and preferential amplification in single cells and human blastomeres: implications for preimplantation diagnosis of sex and cystic fibrosis. Hum Reprod 10:1609–1618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sermon K, De Vos A, Van de Velde H, Seneca S, Lissens W, Joris H et al (1998) Fluorescent PCR and automated fragment analysis for the clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy (Steinert’s disease). Mol Hum Reprod 4:791–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van de Velde H, Sermon K, De Vos A, Lissens W, Joris H, Vandervorst M et al (1999) Fluorescent PCR and automated fragment analysis in preimplantation genetic diagnosis for 21-hydroxylase deficiency in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Mol Hum Reprod 5:691–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blake DL, Dean NL, Knight C, Tan SL, Ao A (2001) Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 18:557–565

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fiorentino F, Magli MC, Podini D, Ferraretti AP, Nuccitelli A, Vitale N et al (2003) The minisequencing method: an alternative strategy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single gene disorders. Mol Hum Reprod 9:399–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dreesen JC, Jacobs LJ, Bras M, Herbergs J, Dumoulin JC, Geraedts JP et al (2000) Multiplex PCR of polymorphic markers flanking the CFTR gene; a general approach for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Mol Hum Reprod 6:391–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sermon K, Goossens V, Seneca S, Lissens W, De Vos A, Vandervorst M et al (1998) Preimplantation diagnosis for Huntington’s disease (HD): clinical application and analysis of the HD expansion in affected embryos. Prenat Diagn 18:1427–1436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Offit K, Sagi M, Hurley K (2006) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer syndromes: a new challenge for preventive medicine. JAMA 296:2727–2730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Schoolcraft W, Strom C, Kuliev A (2001) Preimplantation diagnosis for Fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching. JAMA 285:3130–3133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Sharapova T, Morris R, Taranissi M, Kuliev A (2004) Preimplantation HLA testing. JAMA 291:2079–2085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Karadayi H, Berkil H, Karlikaya G, Sertyel S et al (2004) Development and clinical application of a strategy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single gene disorders combined with HLA matching. Mol Hum Reprod 10:445–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahraman S, Beyazyurek C, Ekmekci CG (2011) Seven years of experience of preimplantation HLA typing: a clinical overview of 327 cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 23:363–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Angell RR, Aitken RJ, van Look PF, Lumsden MA, Templeton AA (1983) Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos after in vitro fertilization. Nature 303:336–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C et al (2009) Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med 15:577–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu S, Zong C, Fan W, Yang M, Li J, Chapman AR et al (2012) Probing meiotic recombination and aneuploidy of single sperm cells by whole-genome sequencing. Science 338:1627–1630

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassold T, Hunt P (2009) Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we wish we knew. Curr Opin Pediatr 21:703–708

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humeau C, Demaille J (2003) Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum Genet 112:195–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Langer-Safer PR, Levine M, Ward DC (1982) Immunological method for mapping genes on Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79:4381–4385

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin DK, Handyside AH, Penketh RJ, Winston RM, Delhanty JD (1991) Fluorescent in-situ hybridization to interphase nuclei of human preimplantation embryos with X and Y chromosome specific probes. Hum Reprod 6:101–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J (1993) Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 8:2185–2191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyer LR, Klipstein S, Hazlett WD, Nasta T, Mangan P, Karande VC (2009) A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the “good prognosis” patient. Fertil Steril 91:1731–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Staessen C, Verpoest W, Donoso P, Haentjens P, Van der Elst J, Liebaers I et al (2008) Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 23:2818–2825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schrock E, du Manoir S, Veldman T, Schoell B, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith MA et al (1996) Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273:494–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F et al (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258:818–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P, Williamson R, McBain J (2003) Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril 80:860–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Delhanty JD, Munne S (2002) First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 78:543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, Maassarani G, Tortoriello D, Brody S (2009) Genetic analysis of human embryos by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) improves efficiency of IVF by increasing embryo implantation rate and reducing multiple pregnancies and spontaneous miscarriages. Fertil Steril 92:1886–1894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Wells D, Benet J, Sanchez-Garcia JF, Bermudez MG, Belil I et al (2004) Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes. Hum Reprod 19:2118–2125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rius M, Obradors A, Daina G, Cuzzi J, Marques L, Calderon G et al (2010) Reliability of short comparative genomic hybridization in fibroblasts and blastomeres for a comprehensive aneuploidy screening: first clinical application. Hum Reprod 25:1824–1835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S (2008) Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Reprod Biomed Online 17:841–847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Daphnis DD, Goodall NN, Mania A, Griffiths T et al (2011) Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum Reprod 26:480–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M et al (2010) Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod 25:1066–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pinto D, Darvishi K, Shi X, Rajan D, Rigler D, Fitzgerald T et al (2011) Comprehensive assessment of array-based platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants. Nat Biotechnol 29:512–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Treff NR, Tao X, Ferry KM, Su J, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr (2012) Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril 97:819–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cassel MJ, Munne S, Fung J, Weier HU (1997) Carrier-specific breakpoint-spanning DNA probes: an approach to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in interphase cells. Hum Reprod 12:2019–2027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. National Institutes of Health and Institute of Molecular Medicine (1996) A complete set of human telomeric probes and their clinical application. Nat Genet 14:86–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Iwarsson E, Ahrlund-Richter L, Inzunza J, Rosenlund B, Fridstrom M, Hillensjo T et al (1998) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a large pericentric inversion of chromosome 5. Mol Hum Reprod 4:719–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vanneste E, Melotte C, Voet T, Robberecht C, Debrock S, Pexsters A et al (2011) PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 26:941–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP (2005) Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 84:1628–1636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Munne S, Weier HU, Grifo J, Cohen J (1994) Chromosome mosaicism in human embryos. Biol Reprod 51:373–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Delhanty JD, Harper JC, Ao A, Handyside AH, Winston RM (1997) Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients. Hum Genet 99:755–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L, Gianaroli L, Korman I, Trounson AO (2000) Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro. Hum Reprod 15:1781–1786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A, Bergh C, Nyboe Andersen A, Selleskog U et al (2003) FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod 18:2575–2581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. van Echten-Arends J, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Heineman MJ, van der Veen F et al (2011) Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17:620–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mertzanidou A, Wilton L, Cheng J, Spits C, Vanneste E, Moreau Y et al (2013) Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Hum Reprod 28:256–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Baart EB, Martini E, van den Berg I, Macklon NS, Galjaard RJ, Fauser BC et al (2006) Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod 21:223–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Daphnis DD, Delhanty JD, Jerkovic S, Geyer J, Craft I, Harper JC (2005) Detailed FISH analysis of day 5 human embryos reveals the mechanisms leading to mosaic aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 20:129–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Munne S, Velilla E, Colls P, Garcia Bermudez M, Vemuri MC, Steuerwald N et al (2005) Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos in culture and implications for stem cell production. Fertil Steril 84:1328–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Barbash-Hazan S, Frumkin T, Malcov M, Yaron Y, Cohen T, Azem F et al (2009) Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential. Fertil Steril 92:890–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR (2013) Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril 100:624–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W et al (2008) Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 23:481–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Harton GL, Munne S, Surrey M, Grifo J, Kaplan B, McCulloh DH et al (2013) Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril 100(6):1695–1703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dekel-Naftali M, Aviram-Goldring A, Litmanovitch T, Shamash J, Yonath H, Hourvitz A et al (2013) Chromosomal integrity of human preimplantation embryos at different days post fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 30:633–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Evsikov S, Verlinsky Y (1998) Mosaicism in the inner cell mass of human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 13:3151–3155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bielanska M, Jin S, Bernier M, Tan SL, Ao A (2005) Diploid-aneuploid mosaicism in human embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 84:336–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Clouston HJ, Herbert M, Fenwick J, Murdoch AP, Wolstenholme J (2002) Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts. Prenat Diagn 22:1143–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Johnson DS, Cinnioglu C, Ross R, Filby A, Gemelos G, Hill M et al (2010) Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Mol Hum Reprod 16:944–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mamas T, Gordon A, Brown A, Harper J, Sengupta S (2012) Detection of aneuploidy by array comparative genomic hybridization using cell lines to mimic a mosaic trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril 97:943–947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Derhaag JG, Coonen E, Bras M, Bergers Janssen JM, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen R, Geraedts JP et al (2003) Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 18:2565–2574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ruangvutilert P, Delhanty JD, Serhal P, Simopoulou M, Rodeck CH, Harper JC (2000) FISH analysis on day 5 post-insemination of human arrested and blastocyst stage embryos. Prenat Diagn 20:552–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G, Lifchez A et al (1997) Preimplantation diagnosis of single gene disorders by two-step oocyte genetic analysis using first and second polar body. Biochem Mol Med 62:182–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Forman EJ, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Garnsey HM, Katz-Jaffe MG, Scott RT Jr et al (2013) Embryos whose polar bodies contain isolated reciprocal chromosome aneuploidy are almost always euploid. Hum Reprod 28:502–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Scott RT Jr, Treff NR, Stevens J, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Katz-Jaffe MG et al (2012) Delivery of a chromosomally normal child from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies. J Assist Reprod Genet 29:533–537

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kuliev A, Zlatopolsky Z, Kirillova I, Spivakova J, Cieslak Janzen J (2011) Meiosis errors in over 20,000 oocytes studied in the practice of preimplantation aneuploidy testing. Reprod Biomed Online 22:2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Capalbo A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, Baldi M, Colamaria S et al (2013) Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development. Hum Reprod 28:509–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Christopikou D, Tsorva E, Economou K, Shelley P, Davies S, Mastrominas M et al (2013) Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod 28:1426–1434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Warburton D (2005) Biological aging and the etiology of aneuploidy. Cytogenet Genome Res 111:266–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Harper JC, Wilton L, Traeger-Synodinos J, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta SB et al (2012) The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. Hum Reprod Update 18:234–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munne S (1999) Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril 72:837–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S, Gianaroli L, Simpson JL, Ferraretti AP et al (2004) Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report. Fertil Steril 82:292–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR et al (2007) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. New Engl J Med 357:9–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Cohen J, Grifo JA (2007) Multicentre trial of preimplantation genetic screening reported in the New England Journal of Medicine: an in-depth look at the findings. Reprod Biomed Online 15:365–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S (2007) Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril 87:496–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S (2011) Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update 17:454–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive T, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive M (2008) Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 90:S136–S143

    Google Scholar 

  82. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D (2010) Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 94:1700–1706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D et al (2013) Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100:697–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B et al (2013) In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100:100–7 e1

    Google Scholar 

  85. Treff NR, Scott RT Jr (2013) Four-hour quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based comprehensive chromosome screening and accumulating evidence of accuracy, safety, predictive value, and clinical efficacy. Fertil Steril 99:1049–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Lander ES (2011) Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature 470:187–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara N, Shaw MA et al (2010) Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet 47:651–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang L, Cui X, Schmitt K, Hubert R, Navidi W, Arnheim N (1992) Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:5847–5851

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Nordenskjold M, Ponder BA, Tunnacliffe A (1992) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics 13:718–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L, Wu X, Faruqi AF, Bray-Ward P et al (2002) Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:5261–5266

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Ling J, Zhuang G, Tazon-Vega B, Zhang C, Cao B, Rosenwaks Z et al (2009) Evaluation of genome coverage and fidelity of multiple displacement amplification from single cells by SNP array. Mol Hum Reprod 15:739–747

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. van Uum CM, Stevens SJ, Dreesen JC, Drusedau M, Smeets HJ, Hollanders-Crombach B et al (2012) SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations. Eur J Hum Genet 20:938–944

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Lo YM, Chan KC, Sun H, Chen EZ, Jiang P, Lun FM et al (2010) Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Sci Transl Med 2:61ra91

    Google Scholar 

  94. Xu KPVA, Zhang CH, Jiang H, Zhang XQ, Rosenwaks Z (2011) Whole genome deep sequencing from single cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 96:S220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Yin X, Tan K, Vajta G, Jiang H, Tan Y, Zhang C et al (2013) Massively parallel sequencing for chromosomal abnormality testing in trophectoderm cells of human blastocysts. Biol Reprod 88:69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Gole J, Gore A, Richards A, Chiu YJ, Fung HL, Bushman D et al (2013) Massively parallel polymerase cloning and genome sequencing of single cells using nanoliter microwells. Nat Biotechnol 31:1126–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL et al (2013) ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 15:565–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2012). Privacy and progress in whole genome sequencing. http://www.bioethics.gov

  99. Nekkebroeck J, Bonduelle M, Desmyttere S, Van den Broeck W, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I (2008) Mental and psychomotor development of 2-year-old children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening. Hum Reprod 23:1560–1566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Nekkebroeck J, Bonduelle M, Desmyttere S, Van den Broeck W, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I (2008) Socio-emotional and language development of 2-year-old children born after PGD/PGS, and parental well-being. Hum Reprod 23:1849–1857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Palini S, Galluzzi L, De Stefani S, Bianchi M, Wells D, Magnani M et al (2013) Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online 26:603–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Tur-Kaspa I, Aljadeff G, Rechitsky S, Grotjan HE, Verlinsky Y (2010) PGD for all cystic fibrosis carrier couples: novel strategy for preventive medicine and cost analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 21: 186–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Davis LB, Champion SJ, Fair SO, Baker VL, Garber AM (2010) A cost-benefit analysis of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carrier couples of cystic fibrosis. Fertil Steril 93:1793–1804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1305 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Kangpu Xu Ph.D. & David Reichman M.D.

Authors
  1. Kangpu Xu Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Reichman M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA

    Zev Rosenwaks

  2. Dept. Developmental & Regenerative Biology, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

    Paul M. Wassarman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Xu, K., Reichman, D. (2014). Detection of Monogenic Disorders and Chromosome Aberrations by Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. In: Rosenwaks, Z., Wassarman, P. (eds) Human Fertility. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1154. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0658-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0659-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation