Skip to main content

Problems and Perspectives in the Publication of Ethnobiological Studies

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology

Abstract

Ethnobiology attempts to understand the relationship between man, the environment, and the biota and has significantly contributed to the knowledge and conservation of biodiversity and the search for new molecules with biological action, especially in such disciplines as ethnopharmacology and ethnobotany. However, many publications in the field have ethical, methodological, and theoretical problems and poor and limited results. Thus, the purpose of this chapter is to review several key aspects to ensure reliable data collection and the quality of publications, especially of ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Diegues AC, Arruda RSV (eds) (2001) Saberes tradicionais e biodiversidade no Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente/USP, Brasília/São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alves AGC, Albuquerque UP (2005) Exorcizando termos em etnobiologia e etnoecologia. In: Alves AGC, Lucena RFP, Albuquerque UP (eds) Atualidades em etnobiologia e etnoecologia, vol 2. NUPEEA/Sociedade Brasileira de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia, Recife

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gadgil M, Berkes F, Folke C (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Almeida CFCBR, Albuquerque UP (2002) Uso e conservação de plantas e animais medicinais no estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil): um estudo de caso. Interciencia 27:276–285

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gazzaneo LR, Lucena RFP, Albuquerque UP (2005) Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by local specialists in a region of Atlantic Forest in the state of Pernambuco (Northeastern Brazil). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 1:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2006) From cnidarians to mammals: the use of animals as remedies in fishing communities in NE Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 107:259–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Albuquerque UP (2005) Introdução à etnobotânica. Editora Interciência, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stepp JR, Moerman DE (2001) The importance of weeds in ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 75:19–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stepp JR (2004) The role of weeds as sources of pharmaceuticals. J Ethnopharmacol 92: 163–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Voeks RA (2004) Disturbance pharmacopoeias: medicine and myth from the humid tropics. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94:868–888

    Google Scholar 

  12. Almeida CFCBR, Silva TCL, Amorim ELC et al (2005) Life strategy and chemical composition as predictors of the selection of medicinal plants from the Caatinga (Northeast Brazil). J Arid Environ 62:127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP (2005) Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia 30:506–511

    Google Scholar 

  14. Monteiro JM, Albuquerque UP, Lins Neto EMF (2006) Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among two rural communities in Brazil’s semi-arid northeastern region. J Ethnopharmacol 105:173–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Estomba D, Ladio A, Lozada M (2006) Medicinal wild plant knowledge and gathering patterns in a Mapuche community from North-western Patagonia. J Ethnopharmacol 103:109–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Araújo TAS, Alencar NL, Amorim ELC et al (2008) A new approach to study medicinal plants with tannins and flavonoids contents from the local knowledge. J Ethnopharmacol 120:72–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McClatchey W (2006) Improving quality of international ethnobotany research and publications. Ethnobot Res Appl 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lima CP, Jeckel-Neto EA, Baracat EC et al (1999) Analisando teses e dissertações. Femina 27:805–808

    Google Scholar 

  19. Castro AA (2002) Avaliação crítica da literatura: roteiro para a sessão de artigos de revista. AAC, Maceió. http://www.metodologia.org. Accessed 7 Aug 2006

  20. Bernard HR (1995) Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Altamira, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin GJ (1995) Ethnobotany: a people and plants conservation manual. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Alexiades M (1996) Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. New York Botanical Garden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Albuquerque UP (2001) The use of medicinal plants by the cultural descendants of African people in Brazil. Acta Farm Bonaerense 20:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  24. Albuquerque UP (2006) Folhas Sagradas—As Plantas Litúrgicas e Medicinais nos Cultos Afro-Brasileiros. NUPEEA, Recife

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ikuta ARY (2001) Práticas fitotécnicas de uma comunidade indígena mbyá guarani, Varzinha, Rio Grande do Sul: da roça ao artezanato. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

    Google Scholar 

  26. Amorozo MCM (1996) A abordagem etnobotânica na pesquisa de plantas medicinais. In: Di Stasi LC (org.) Plantas medicinais: arte e ciência. Unesp, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  27. Viertler RB (2002) Métodos antropológicos como ferramenta para estudos em etnobiologia e etnoecologia. In: Amorozo MCM, Ming LC, Silva SMP (orgs.) Métodos de coleta e análise de dados em Etnobiologia, Etnoecologia e Disciplinas correlatas. I Seminário de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia do Sudeste, Rio Claro

    Google Scholar 

  28. Edwards S, Nebel S, Heinrich M (2005) Questionnaire surveys: methodological and epistemological problems for field-based ethnopharmacologists. J Ethnopharmacol 100:30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Berlin EA, Berlin B (2005) Some field methods in medical ethnobiology. Field Methods 17:235–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bermúdez A, Oliveira-Miranda MA, Velázquez D (2005) La investigación etnobotánica sobre plantas medicinales: una revisión de sus objetivos y enfoques actuales. Interciencia 30:453–459

    Google Scholar 

  31. Waller DP (1993) Methods in ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 38:189–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Etkin NL (2001) Perspectives in ethnopharmacology: forging a closer link between bioscience and traditional empirical knowledge. J Ethnopharmacol 76:177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Canales M, Hernández T, Caballero J et al (2005) Informant consensus factor and antibacterial activity of the medicinal plants used by the people of San Rafael Coxcatlán, Puebla, México. J Ethnopharmacol 97:429–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Amiguet VT, Arnason JT, Maquin P (2005) A consensus ethnobotany of the Q’eqchi’ Maya of southern Belize. Econ Bot 59:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Almeida CFCBR, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP et al (2006) Medicinal plants popularly used in the Xingo region—a semi-arid location in Northeastern Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2:15

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Leduc C, Coonishish J, Haddad P et al (2006) Plants used by the Cree Nation of Eeyou Istchee (Quebec, Canada) for the treatment of diabetes: a novel approach in quantitative ethnobotany. J Ethnopharmacol 105:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Andrade-Cetto A, Becerra-Jiménez J, Martinez-Zurita E et al (2006) Disease-consensus index as a tool of selecting potential hypoglycemic plants in Chikindzonot, Yucatán, México. J Ethnopharmacol 107:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Berlin B (1999) Lexical reflections on the cultural importance of medicinal plants among Tzotzil and Tzeltal Maya. In: Gragson TL, Blount BG (eds) Ethnoecology: knowledge, resources and rights. The University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  39. Di Stasi LC (2005) An integrated approach to identification and conservation of medicinal plants in the tropical forest—a Brazilian experience. Plant Genet Resour 3:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2000) Cópia do Decreto Legislativo número 2, de 5 de junho de 1992. http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/sbf_chm_rbbio/_arquivos/cdbport_72.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012

  41. Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica (2002). Directrices de Bonn sobre Acceso a los Recursos Genéticos y Participación Justa y Equitativa en los Beneficios Provenientes de su Utilización. Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  42. International Society of Ethnobiology (2006) International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions). http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics. Accessed 20 Sept 2012

  43. Cunha MC (1999) Populações tradicionais e a conservação da biodiversidade. Estudos Avançados 13:147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cordell GA (2000) Biodiversity and drug discovery—a symbiotic relationship. Phytochemistry 55:463–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tedlock B (2006) Indigenous heritage and biopiracy in the age of intellectual property rights. Explore 2:256–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rodrigues E, Carlini E (2003) Levantamento etnofarmacológico realizado entre um grupo de quilombolas do Brasil. Arq Bras Fitomed Cientif 1:80–87

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rodrigues E, Carlini E (2003) Possíveis efeitos sobre o sistema nervoso central de plantas utilizadas por duas culturas brasileiras (quilombolas e índios). Arq Bras Fitomed Científ 1:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  48. Platiau AFB, Varella MD (2004) Diversidade biológica e conhecimentos tradicionais. Coleção Direito Ambiental. Del Rey, Belo Horizonte

    Google Scholar 

  49. McClatchey W (2005) Exorcing misleading terms from ethnobotany. Ethnobot Res Appl 3:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  50. Elisabetsky E (2003) Direitos de propriedade intelectual e distribuição equitativa de benefícios no contexto de inovação tecnológica. In: Anais do I Simpósio de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia da região Sul: aspectos humanos da biodiversidade. Sociedade Brasileira de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia, Florianópolis

    Google Scholar 

  51. Spata AV (2005) Métodos de pesquisa: ciências do comportamento e diversidade humana. Livros Técnicos e Científicos Editora S.A, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasil (2008) Diferenças entre a MP 2.186-16 e o Anteprojeto de Lei. http://www.mma.gov.br/ascom/ultimas/index.cfm?id=3774. Accessed 3 Feb 2008

  53. Lavratti PC (2004) Acesso ao patrimônio genético e aos conhecimentos tradicionais associados. http://www.museu-goeldi.br/institucional/i_prop_documen.htm. Accessed 17 Feb 2008

  54. Verpoorte R, Houghton PJ, Heinrich M et al (2006) Editorial. J Ethnopharmacol 103:309–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pieroni A (2006) Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine: achievements and perspectives. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2:10

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Moerman DE (2005) An open letter to SEB members, and readers of Economic Botany, from the editor in chief. Econ Bot 59:309–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Posey DA, Dutfield G (1996) Beyond intellectual property: toward traditional resource rights for indigenous peoples and local communities. International Development Research Center, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  58. Moran K, King SR, Carlson TJ (2001) Biodiversity prospecting: lessons and prospects. Annu Rev Anthropol 30:505–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Albuquerque, U.P., Hanazaki, N., de Melo, J.G. (2014). Problems and Perspectives in the Publication of Ethnobiological Studies. In: Albuquerque, U., Cruz da Cunha, L., de Lucena, R., Alves, R. (eds) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8635-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8636-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics