Skip to main content

Neuroradiology: Differential Diagnosis, Follow-Up, and Reporting

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
  • 1056 Accesses

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2152))

Abstract

Cavernous cerebral malformations (CCMs) can show typical and characteristic findings at neuroradiology, above all at magnetic resonance imaging, but differential diagnosis with other lesions of similar appearance can be challenging and should be taken into consideration. Management of CCMs can be conservative in most cases, and thus appropriate follow-up timing and modality is required. Growing input from neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, and patients recommend to offer a standard neuroradiological report, to enhance interpretation and comparability in daily clinical practice. The purpose of this chapter is to present differential diagnosis, follow-up, and reporting of CCMs by neuroradiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Labauge P, Brunereau L, Laberge S, Houtteville JP (2001) Prospective follow-up of 33 asymptomatic patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurology 57:1825. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.57.10.1825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Labauge P, Brunereau L, Lévy C et al (2000) The natural history of familial cerebral cavernomas: a retrospective MRI study of 40 patients. Neuroradiology 42:327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zabramski JM, Wascher TM, Spetzler RF et al (1994) The natural history of familial cavernous malformations: results of an ongoing study. J Neurosurg 80:422. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1994.80.3.0422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell PG, Jabbour P, Yadla S, Awad IA (2010) Emerging clinical imaging techniques for cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 29:E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.5.FOCUS10120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rigamonti D, Johnson PC, Spetzler RF et al (1991) Cavernous malformations and capillary telangiectasia: a spectrum within a single pathological entity. Neurosurgery 28:60. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199101000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rigamonti D, Drayer BP, Johnson PC, Hadley MN, Zabramski J, Spetzler RF (1987) The MRI appearance of cavernous malformations (angiomas). J Neurosurg 67:518–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Golden M, Saeidi S, Liem B et al (2015) Sensitivity of patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations to therapeutic radiation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 59:134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalyai RT, Ghobrial G, Awad I et al (2011) Management of incidental cavernous malformations: a review. Neurosurg Focus 31:E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.9.FOCUS11211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Akers A, Al-Shahi Salman R, Awad IA et al (2017) Synopsis of guidelines for the clinical management of cerebral cavernous malformations: consensus recommendations based on systematic literature review by the angioma alliance scientific advisory board clinical experts panel. Clin Neurosurg 80:665. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kivelev J, Niemelä M, Kivisaari R et al (2009) Long-term outcome of patients with multiple cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery 65:450. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000346269.59554.DB

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Velz J, Stienen MN, Neidert MC et al (2018) Routinely performed serial follow-up imaging in asymptomatic patients with multiple cerebral cavernous malformations has no influence on surgical decision making. Front Neurol 9:848. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00848

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bulut HT, Sarica MA, Baykan AH (2014) The value of susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of patients with familial cerebral cavernous angioma. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:5296–5302

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Singla A, O’Neill JEB, Smith E, Scott RM (2013) Cavernous malformations of the brain after treatment for acute lymphocytic leukemia: presentation and long-term follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:127. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.11.PEDS12235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faraci M, Morana G, Bagnasco F et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging in childhood leukemia survivors treated with cranial radiotherapy: a cross sectional, single center study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57:240. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.22923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neu MA, Tanyildizi Y, Wingerter A et al (2018) Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrovascular sequelae after radiotherapy for pediatric brain tumors. Radiother Oncol 127:280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS et al (2015) Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 46:2032. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Shahi Salman RA, Berg MJ, Morrison L, Salman A (2008) Hemorrhage from cavernous malformations of the brain. Definition and reporting standards. Stroke 39:3222. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.515544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerase A, Franceschini R, Battistini S, Maria Vallone I, Penco S, Venturi C (2010) Cavernous malformation of the optic nerve mimicking optic neuritis. J Neuroophthalmol 30:126. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181ceb428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Muccio CF, Catapano G, Di Blasi A, Esposito G, Cerase A (2008) Giant cystic intraventricular cerebral cavernous malformation: MRI with pathologic correlation. A case report. Neuroradiol J 21:547–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao G, Jensen RL (2003) Coexistent cerebral metastasis and cavernous malformation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Splendiani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Splendiani, A., Bruno, F., Cerase, A. (2020). Neuroradiology: Differential Diagnosis, Follow-Up, and Reporting. In: Trabalzini, L., Finetti, F., Retta, S. (eds) Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCM) . Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2152. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0640-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0640-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0639-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0640-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics