Abstract
Shortly after the development of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, it was recognized that it is prone to induce off-target mutations at significant frequencies. Therefore, there is a strong motivation to develop Cas9 enzymes with reduced off-target activity. Multiple rational design or selection approaches have been applied to develop several Cas9 versions with reduced off-target activities (high fidelity). To make these high-fidelity Cas9s available for model systems other than human cells and bacterial strains, as, for example, in zebrafish, new specialized expression vectors need to be developed. In this chapter, we focused on the HypaCas9 and HiFi Cas9 high-fidelity enzymes and incorporated the mutations of these Cas9 versions into a codon-optimized zebrafish Cas9 vector. This optimized vector was further improved by introducing an artificial polyadenine insert (A71) since polyadenylation is known to enhance mRNA translational efficiency. The Hypa-nCas9n and HiFi-nCas9n vectors were produced by single-site mutagenesis from pT3TS-nCas9n-A71 vector. We then tested the polyadenylated mRNAs for nCas9n, Hypa-nCas9n, HiFi-nCas9n, and HiFi-Cas9 protein for editing efficiency in five genome editing strategies and found that these high-fidelity Cas9 versions had different performances ranging from activity at 2–4 sites, where the wild-type nCas9n is active, indicating that these Cas9 versions have different sgRNA preferences. In summary, the developed new high-fidelity Cas9 vectors will enable researchers to perform much more accurate genome editing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I et al (2012) A programmable dual RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816–821
Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V (2012) Cas9—crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:2579–2586
Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim J-S (2013) Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 31:230–232
Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D et al (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339:819–823
Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM et al (2013) RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339:823–826
Kass EM, Jasin M (2010) Collaboration and competition between DNA double-strand break repair pathways. FEBS Lett 584:3703–3708
Voit RA, McMahon MA, Sawyer SL, Porteus MH (2013) Generation of an HIV resistant T-cell line by targeted “stacking” of restriction factors. Mol Ther 21:786–795
Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C et al (2013) High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 31:822–826
Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA et al (2013) DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31:827–832
Pattanayak V, Lin S, Guilinger JP et al (2013) High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol 31:839–843
Slaymaker IM, Gao L, Zetsche B et al (2016) Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351:84–89
Kleinstiver BP, Pattanayak V, Prew MS et al (2016) High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529:490–495
Nishimasu H, Ran FA, Hsu PD et al (2014) Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156:935–949
Anders C, Niewoehner O, Duerst A, Jinek M (2014) Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513:569–573
Chen JS, Dagdas YS, Kleinstiver BP et al (2017) Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy. Nature 550:407–410
Casini A, Olivieri M, Petris G et al (2018) A highly specific SpCas9 variant is identified by in vivo screening in yeast. Nat Biotechnol 36:265–271
Vakulskas CA, Dever DP, Rettig GR et al (2018) A high-fidelity Cas9 mutant delivered as a ribonucleoprotein complex enables efficient gene editing in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat Med 24:1216–1224
Davis EE, Frangakis S, Katsanis N (2014) Interpreting human genetic variation with in vivo zebrafish assays. Biochim Biophys Acta 1842:1960–1970
Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF et al (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496:498–503
Jao L-E, Wente SR, Chen W (2013) Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:13904–13909
Fujii W, Onuma A, Sugiura K, Naito K (2014) Efficient generation of genome-modified mice via offset-nicking by CRISPR/Cas system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 445:791–794
Yin L, Jao L-E, Chen W (2015) Generation of targeted mutations in zebrafish using the CRISPR/Cas system. Methods Mol Biol 1332:205–217
Burger A, Lindsay H, Felker A et al (2016) Maximizing mutagenesis with solubilized CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Development 143:2025–2037
Xiao A, Zhang B (2016) Generation of targeted genomic deletions through CRISPR/Cas system in zebrafish. Methods Mol Biol 1451:65–79
Prykhozhij SV, Steele SL, Razaghi B, Berman JN (2017) A rapid and effective method for screening, sequencing and reporter verification of engineered frameshift mutations in zebrafish. Dis Model Mech 10:811–822
Gagnon JA, Valen E, Thyme SB et al (2014) Efficient mutagenesis by Cas9 protein-mediated oligonucleotide insertion and large-scale assessment of single-guide RNAs. PLoS One 9:e98186
Prykhozhij SV, Rajan V, Berman JN (2015) A guide to computational tools and design strategies for genome editing experiments in zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9. Zebrafish 13:70–73
Cui Y, Xu J, Cheng M et al (2018) Review of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA design tools. Interdiscip Sci 10:455–465
Yoshimi K, Kunihiro Y, Kaneko T et al (2016) SsODN-mediated knock-in with CRISPR-Cas for large genomic regions in zygotes. Nat Commun 7:10431
Prykhozhij SV, Fuller C, Steele SL et al (2018) Optimized knock-in of point mutations in zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9. Nucleic Acids Res 46:9252
Middel V, Zhou L, Takamiya M et al (2016) Dysferlin-mediated phosphatidylserine sorting engages macrophages in sarcolemma repair. Nat Commun 7:12875
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Prykhozhij, S.V., Cordeiro-Santanach, A., Caceres, L., Berman, J.N. (2020). Genome Editing in Zebrafish Using High-Fidelity Cas9 Nucleases: Choosing the Right Nuclease for the Task. In: Sioud, M. (eds) RNA Interference and CRISPR Technologies. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2115. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0290-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0290-4_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0289-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0290-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols