Skip to main content

Assessment of Immune Protective T Cell Repertoire in Humans Immunized with Novel Tuberculosis Vaccines

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2111))

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major global health concerns. There has been a lack of an effective vaccine strategy. The Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), the only licensed vaccine against TB, is not effective against adult pulmonary TB, the highly contagious form of TB. In the past two decades or so, many novel TB vaccines have been developed, and some of them were evaluated in clinical trials. However, the lack of validated immune correlates to assess the clinical relevance of novel TB vaccines before their entry into costly efficacy trials is a huge challenge to the field of TB vaccine development. Here we describe a general protocol for the procedure of a systematic immunological approach that can be utilized to better assess the clinical relevance of TB vaccine-activated T cells in early phases of clinical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. WHO (2018) Global tuberculosis report. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Voss G, Casimiro D, Neyrolles O et al (2018) Progress and challenges in TB vaccine development. F1000Res 7:199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufmann SHE, Dockrell HM, Drager N et al (2017) TBVAC2020: advancing tuberculosis vaccines from discovery to clinical development. Front Immunol 8:1203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Xing Z, Jeyanathan M, Smaill F (2014) New approaches to TB vaccination. Chest 146:804–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tameris MD, Hatherill M, Landry BS et al (2013) Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 381:1021–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nemes E, Geldenhuys H, Rozot V et al (2018) Prevention of M. tuberculosis infection with H4:IC31 vaccine or BCG revaccination. N Engl J Med 379:138–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufmann SHE, Weiner J, von Reyn CF (2017) Novel approaches to tuberculosis vaccine development. Int J Infect Dis 56:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeyanathan M, Yao Y, Afkhami S et al (2018) New tuberculosis vaccine strategies: taking aim at un-natural immunity. Trends Immunol 39:419–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Q, Song H-Y, Ellner JJ et al (2002) Bactericidal activity in whole blood as a potential surrogate marker of immunity after vaccination against tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 9:901–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Q, Hoft DF, Kampmann B et al (2002) Investigation of the relationships between immune-mediated inhibition of Mycobacterial growth and other potential surrogate markers of protective Mycobacterium tuberculosis immunity. J Infect Dis 186:1448–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Minassian AM, Satti I, Poulton ID et al (2012) A human challenge model for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin. J Infect Dis 205:1035–1042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeyanathan M, Damjanovic D, Yao Y et al (2016) Induction of an immune-protective t-cell repertoire with diverse genetic coverage by a novel viral-vectored tuberculosis vaccine in humans. J Infect Dis 214:1996–2005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmeister B, Kiecker F, Tesfa L et al (2003) Mapping T cell epitopes by flow cytometry. Methods 29:270–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peters B, Sette A, Kim Y et al (2012) Immune epitope database analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res 40:W525–W530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weichold FF, Mueller S, Kortsik C et al (2007) Impact of MHC class I alleles on the M. tuberculosis antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell response in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Genes Immun 8:334–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by funds from the Foundation Program of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Collaborative Health Research Program of CIHR and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Xing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Jeyanathan, M., Xing, Z. (2020). Assessment of Immune Protective T Cell Repertoire in Humans Immunized with Novel Tuberculosis Vaccines. In: Liu, C. (eds) T-Cell Receptor Signaling. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2111. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0266-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0266-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0265-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0266-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics