Abstract
The study of microtubule dynamics is of utmost importance for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying mitotic fidelity. During mitosis, the microtubular cytoskeleton reorganizes to assemble a mitotic spindle necessary for chromosome segregation. Several methods, such as controlled exposure to cold, high pressure, high calcium concentration, or microtubule depolymerizing drugs, have been widely used to evaluate the dynamic properties of specific spindle microtubule populations. However, while these methods offer a qualitative approach that is sufficient to discern differences among specific spindle microtubule populations, they fall short in providing a robust quantitative picture that is sensitive enough to highlight minor differences, for example when comparing spindle microtubule dynamics in different genetic backgrounds. In this chapter we describe a detailed methodology to measure spindle microtubule dynamics using photoactivation of fluorescently tagged tubulin in living cells. This methodology allows the quantitative discrimination of the turnover of specific microtubule populations (e.g., kinetochore vs. non-kinetochore microtubules), as well as determination of microtubule poleward flux rates. These two conspicuous features of metazoan spindles must be tightly regulated to allow, on the one hand, efficient error correction, and on the other hand the satisfaction of the spindle assembly checkpoint that controls mitotic fidelity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mitchison T, Kirschner M (1984) Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312(5991):237–242
Mitchison T (1989) Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J Cell Biol 109(2):637–652
Belmont L, Hyman A, Sawin K, Mitchison T (1990) Real-time visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts. Cell 62(3):579–589
Piehl M, Cassimeris L (2003) Organization and dynamics of growing microtubule plus ends during early mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 14(3):916–925
Bakhoum SF, Compton DA (2012) Kinetochores and disease: keeping microtubule dynamics in check. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24(1):64–70
Matos I, Maiato H (2011) Prevention and correction mechanisms behind anaphase synchrony: implications for the genesis of aneuploidy. Cytogenet Genome Res 133(2–4):243–253
Zhai Y, Kronebusch PJ, Borisy GG (1995) Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J Cell Biol 131(3):721–734
Godek KM, Kabeche L, Compton DA (2015) Regulation of kinetochore–microtubule attachments through homeostatic control during mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16(1):57
Waterman-Storer CM, Desai A, Bulinski JC, Salmon E (1998) Fluorescent speckle microscopy, a method to visualize the dynamics of protein assemblies in living cells. Curr Biol 8(22):1227–S1221
Carminati JL, Stearns T (1997) Microtubules orient the mitotic spindle in yeast through dynein-dependent interactions with the cell cortex. J Cell Biol 138(3):629–641
Fernández-Suárez M, Ting AY (2008) Fluorescent probes for super-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(12):929
Patterson GH, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2002) A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science 297(5588):1873–1877
Sample V, Newman RH, Zhang J (2009) The structure and function of fluorescent proteins. Chem Soc Rev 38(10):2852–2864
Nienhaus K, Nienhaus GU (2014) Fluorescent proteins for live-cell imaging with super-resolution. Chem Soc Rev 43(4):1088–1106
Renz M, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2014) Optical highlighters: applications to cell biology. In: Day RN, Davidson MW (eds) The fluorescent protein revolution, 1st edn. CRC Press Taylor & Francis, pp 197–224
Wadsworth P, Salmon E (1986) Analysis of the treadmilling model during metaphase of mitosis using fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching. J Cell Biol 102(3):1032–1038
Krafft G, Cummings R, Dizio J, Furukawa R, Brvenik L, Sutton W, Ware B (1986) Fluorescence photoactivation and dissipation (FPD). In: Nucleocytoplasmic transport. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–52
Vigers G, Coue M, McIntosh J (1988) Fluorescent microtubules break up under illumination. J Cell Biol 107(3):1011–1024
Pereira AJ, Maiato H (2010) Improved kymography tools and its applications to mitosis. Methods 51(2):214–219
Kabeche L, Compton DA (2012) Checkpoint-independent stabilization of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Mad2 in human cells. Curr Biol 22(7):638–644
Orr B, Talje L, Liu Z, Kwok BH, Compton DA (2016) Adaptive resistance to an inhibitor of chromosomal instability in human cancer cells. Cell Rep 17(7):1755–1763
Gorbsky GJ (2013) Cohesion fatigue. Curr Biol 23(22):R986–R988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.017
Acknowledgments
Work in the laboratory of H.M. is funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 681443) and FLAD Life Science 2020. H.G. holds a Ph.D. fellowship from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/141066/2018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Girão, H., Maiato, H. (2020). Measurement of Microtubule Half-Life and Poleward Flux in the Mitotic Spindle by Photoactivation of Fluorescent Tubulin. In: Maiato, H. (eds) Cytoskeleton Dynamics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2101. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0219-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0219-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0218-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0219-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols