Advertisement

Determining the Tendency of Microorganisms to Interact with Hydrocarbon Phases

  • Hauke HarmsEmail author
  • Lukas Y. Wick
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

Three procedures for the determination of the hydrophobicity of microorganisms and/or their tendency to physically interact with hydrocarbon phases are presented. These include the bacterial/microbial adhesion to hydrocarbon (BATH/MATH) test, hydrophobic interaction chromatography and contact angle measurements of filter-retained microbial cell layers.

Keywords:

Bacteria/microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons (BATH/MATH) Contact angle measurement (CAM) Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) 

References

  1. 1.
    Efroymson RA, Alexander M (1991) Biodegradation by an Arthrobacter species of hydrocarbon partitioned into an organic solvent. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1441–1447PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Owsianiak M, Szulc A, Chrzanowski L, Cyplik P, Bogacki M, Olejnik-Schmidt AK, Heipieper HJ (2009) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:545–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neu TR (1996) Significance of bacterial surface-active compounds in interaction of bacteria with interfaces. Microbiol Rev 60:151–166PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wick LY, Wattiau P, Harms H (2002) Influence of the growth substrate on the mycolic acid profiles of mycobacteria. Environ Microbiol 4:612–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rutter PR, Vincent B (1980) The adhesion of microorganisms to surfaces: physico-chemical aspects. In: Berkeley RCW, Lynch RM, Mellin J, Rutter PR, Vincent B (eds) Microbial adhesion to surfaces. E. Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Loosdrecht MCM, Lyklema J, Norde W, Zehnder AJB (1989) Bacterial adhesion: a physicochemical approach. Microb Ecol 17:1–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jucker BA, Zehnder AJB, Harms H (1998) Quantification of polymer interactions in bacterial adhesion. Environ Sci Technol 32:2909–2915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamadi F, Latrache H, Zahir H, Bengourram J, Kouider N, Elghmari A, Habbari K (2011) Evaluation of the relative cell surface charge by using microbial adhesion to hydrocarbon. Microbiology 80:48–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Busscher HJ, van de Beltgritter B, van der Mei HC (1995) Implications of microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons for evaluating cell-surface hydrophobicity. 1. Zeta potentials of hydrocarbon droplets. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 5:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rijnaarts HHM, Norde W, Bouwer EJ, Lyklema J, Zehnder AJB (1993) Bacterial adhesion under static and dynamic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3255–3265PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin RE, Bouwer EJ, Hanna LM (1992) Application of clean-bed filtration theory to bacterial deposition in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 26:1053–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, van der Mei HC, van Pelt AWJ, de Jong HP, Arends J (1984) Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and it relevance for adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:980–983PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smits THM, Wick LY, Harms H, Keel C (2003) Characterization of the surface hydrophobicity of filamentous fungi. Environ Microbiol 5:85–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons – a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenberg M (2006) Microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons: twenty-five years of doing MATH. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262:129–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lichtenberg D, Rosenberg M, Sharfman N, Ofek I (1985) A kinetic approach to bacterial adherence to hydrocarbon. J Microbiol Methods 4:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Sibini S, Morra M (2001) An experimental procedure to obtain the equilibrium contact angle from the Wilhelmy method. Oil Gas Sci Technol 56:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Della Volpe C, Brugnara M, Maniglio D, Siboni S, Wangdu T (2006) About the possibility of experimentally measuring an equilibrium contact angle and its theoretical and practical consequences. In: Mittal KL (ed) Contact angle, wettability and adhesion, vol 4. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van der Mei HC, Rosenberg M, Busscher HJ (1991) Assessment of microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. In: Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhlet PG (eds) Microbial cell surface analysis. VCH, New York, pp 263–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department UmweltmikrobiologieHelmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH – UFZLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations