Advertisement

Collection and Processing of River Organisms and Water Column Organisms

  • Sergi SabaterEmail author
  • Carles Borrego
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

Collecting materials in benthic environments as well as in the water column in rivers should respond to a careful design and planning so the assessment of hydrocarbon effects can be reliable. The selection of control and impact sites, the substrata type to be sampled, the number of replicates, and the randomization of the samples should obey to careful planning in advance. Also the endpoints to be analyzed need to be decided in advance, so the assessment of effects or potential risk could respond to the most exacting standards.

Keywords:

Benthos Experiment design Plankton Replicate Substratum 

References

  1. 1.
    Sabater S, Admiraal W (2005) Biofilms as biological indicators in managed aquatic ecosystems. In: Azim ME, Verdegem MCJ, Van Dam AA, Beveridge MCM (eds) Periphyton: ecology, exploitation and management. Cabi Publishing, Cambridge, pp 159–177Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Likens GE (ed) (2010) Plankton of inland waters. Academic, San Diego. ISBN 978-0-12-381994-9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stewart-Oaten A, Bence JR (2001) Temporal and spatial variation in environmental impact assessment. Ecol Monogr 71:305–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly MG, Cazaubon A, Coring E, DellUomo A, Ector L, Goldsmith B, Guasch H, Hurlimann J, Jarlman A, Kawecka B, Kwandrans J, Laugaste R, Lindstrom EA, Leitao M, Marvan P, Padisak J, Pipp E, Prygiel J, Rott E, Sabater S, vanDam H, Vizinet J (1998) Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J Appl Phycol 10:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Romaní AM, Butturini A, Sabater F, Sabater S (1998) Heterotrophic metabolism in a forest stream sediment: surface versus subsurface zones. Aquat Microb Ecol 16:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gillings MR (2014) Rapid extraction of PCR-competent DNA from recalcitrant environmental samples. In: Paulsen IT, Holmes AJ (eds) Environmental microbiology: methods and protocols, vol 1096, Methods in molecular biology. Humana, Totowa, pp 17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Llirós M, Casamayor EO, Borrego CM (2008) High archaeal richness in the water column of a freshwater sulfurous Karstic lake along an Interannual study. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 66:331–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lodhi MA, Ye GN, Weeden NF, Reisch BI (1994) A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars and Vitis species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12:6–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cruaud P, Vigneron A, Lucchetti-Miganeh C, Ciron PE, Godfroy A, Cambon-Bonavita M-A (2014) Influence of DNA extraction method, 16S rRNA targeted hypervariable regions, and sample origin on microbial diversity detected by 454 pyrosequencing in marine chemosynthetic ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4626–4639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vishnivetskaya T et al (2014) Commercial DNA extraction kits impact observed microbial community composition in permafrost samples. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87:217–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallagher SR (2001) Quantitation of DNA and RNA with absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anno AD, Fabiano M, Duineveld GCA, Kok A (1998) Nucleic acid (DNA, RNA) quantification and RNA/DNA ratio determination in marine sediments: comparison of spectrophotometric, fluorometric, and high-performance liquid chromatography methods and estimation of detrital DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3238–3245Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glasel JA (1995) Validity of nucleic acid purities monitored by 260 nm/280 nm absorbance ratios. Biotechniques 18:62–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manchester KL (1995) Value of A260/A280 ratios for measurement of purity of nucleic acids. Biotechniques 19:208–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manchester KL (1996) Use of UV methods for measurement of protein and nucleic acid concentrations. Biotechniques 20:968–970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilfinger WW, Mackey K, Chomczynski P (1997) Effect of pH and ionic strength on the spectrophotometric assessment of nucleic acid purity. Biotechniques 22:474–481PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Aquatic EcologyUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.Catalan Institute for Water Research -ICRAScientific and Technological Park of the University of GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations