Advertisement

Protocols for Investigating the Microbiology of Drilling Fluids, Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids, and Formations in Unconventional Natural Gas Reservoirs

  • Christopher G. Struchtemeyer
  • Noha H. Youssef
  • Mostafa S. ElshahedEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

Microorganisms that are present in drilling fluids, hydraulic fracturing fluids, and natural gas reservoirs cause a number of problems (e.g., souring of natural gas, corrosion of field infrastructure) that lead to significant costs for the natural gas industry. In spite of their importance, relatively little is known about the abundance, diversity, and community structure of the microbial guilds in (1) fluids that are used to construct natural gas wells or (2) natural gas reservoirs prior to well construction. This chapter provides protocols that can be used to study the microbiology of drilling fluids, hydraulic fracturing fluids, and natural gas reservoirs. The chapter also includes procedures for (1) the timely collection, preservation, transport, and handling of samples from relevant locations; (2) the enumeration of microorganisms that have been implicated in deleterious processes that occur within natural gas wells; (3) the use of cultivation-independent, nucleic acids-based approaches for the characterization and quantification of microorganisms in samples from natural gas wells; and (4) handling and interpreting nucleic acid sequence data in samples from natural gas wells. Relevant information regarding suppliers of equipment, troubleshooting techniques that can be used to overcome problems that may be encountered while studying the microbiological properties of natural gas wells, and research questions that need to be addressed in future studies are also discussed.

Keywords:

Drilling Frac Hydraulic fracturing Natural gas Sulfide production 

References

  1. 1.
    Miller RG, Sorrell SR (2014) The future of oil supply. Philos T R Soc A 372:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Witze A (2007) Energy: that’s oil, folks. Nature 445:14–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curtis JB, Montgomery SL (2002) Recoverable natural gas resource of the United States: summary of recent estimates. AAPG Bull 86:1671–1678Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang H, Chen J, Guo S (2008) Preparation of natural gas adsorbents from high-sulfur petroleum coke. Fuel 87:304–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kerr RA (2010) Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. Science 328:1624–1626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arthur JD, Bohm B, Layne M (2008) Hydraulic fracturing considerations for natural gas wells of the Marcellus Shale. Paper presented at ground water protection council annual forum, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pollastro RM (2007) Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continuous (unconventional) gas accumulation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bull 91:551–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Struchtemeyer CG, Davis JP, Elshahed MS (2011) Influence of the drilling mud formulation process on the bacterial communities in thermogenic natural gas wells of the Barnett Shale. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4744–4753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson K et al (2008) Use of microbiocides in Barnett Shale gas well fracturing fluids to control bacteria related problems. Presented at corrosion conference, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darley HCH, Gray GR (1988) Composition and properties of drilling and completion fluids. Gulf Professional Publishing, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baldi F et al (1996) Dissolution of Barium from Barite in Sewage Sludges and Cultures of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2398–2404PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lie TJ, Godchaux W, Leadbetter ER (1999) Sulfonates as terminal electron acceptors for growth of sulfite-reducing bacteria (Desulfitobacterium spp.) and sulfate-reducing bacteria: effects of inhibitors of sulfidogenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4611–4617PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pereyra L et al (2010) Detection and quantification of functional genes of cellulose-degrading, fermentative, and sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2192–2202CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Struchtemeyer C, Elshahed M (2012) Bacterial communities associated with hydraulic fracturing fluids in thermogenic natural gas wells in North Central Texas, USA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 81:13–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moore SL, Cripps CM (2012) Bacterial survival in fractured Shale-Gas wells of the Horn River Basin. J Canadian Petroleum Technol 51:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veil JA (2010) Water management technologies used by Marcellus Shale Gas Producers. National laboratory, ArgonneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    James A, Burns B (1984) Microbial alteration of subsurface natural gas accumulations. AAPG Bull 68:957–960Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murali MA et al (2013) Microbial communities in flowback water impoundments from hydraulic fracturing for recovery of shale gas. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 86:567–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wuchter C et al (2013) Microbial diversity and methanogenic activity of Antrim Shale formation waters from recently fractured wells. Front Microbiol 4, 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00367
  20. 20.
    Strong LC et al (2014) Biodegradation in waters from hydraulic fracturing: chemistry, microbiology, and engineering. J Environ Eng-ASCE 140. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000792
  21. 21.
    Struchtemeyer CG et al (2005) Evidence for aceticlastic methanogenesis in the presence of sulfate in a gas condensate-contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5348–5353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wagner M et al (1998) Phylogeny of dissimilatory sulfite reductases supports an early origin of sulfate respiration. J Bacteriol 180:2975–2982PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ben-Dov E, Brenner A, Kushmaro A (2007) Quantification of sulfate-reducing bacteria in industrial wastewater, by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using dsrA and apsA genes. Microb Ecol 54:439–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamady M et al (2008) Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat Methods 5:235–237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caporaso JG et al (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Caporaso JG et al (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cole JR et al (2009) The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D141–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schloss PD et al (2009) Introducing Mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Evans J, Sheneman L, Foster J (2006) Relaxed neighbor joining: a fast distance-based phylogenetic tree construction method. J Mol Evol 62:785–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alexander M, Clark FE (1965) Nitrifying bacteria. In: Black CA, Evans DD, White JL, Ensminger LE, Clark FE (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1477–1483Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oblinger JL, Koburger JA (1975) Understanding and teaching the most probable number technique. J Milk Food Technol 38:540–545Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Balch WE, Wolfe R (1976) New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (HS-CoM)-dependent growth of Methanobacterium ruminantium in a pressurized atmosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 32:781–791PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bryant MP (1972) Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 25:1324–1328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Webster G et al (2009) Subsurface microbiology and biogeochemistry of a deep, cold-water carbonate mound from the Porcupine Seabight (IODP Expedition 307). Environ Microbiol 11:239–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Einen J, Thorseth IH, Ovreas L (2008) Enumeration of Archaea and Bacteria in seafloor basalt using real-time quantitative PCR and fluorescence microscopy. FEMS Microbiol Lett 282:182–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Varon-Lopez M et al (2014) Sulphur-oxidizing and sulphate-reducing communities in Brazilian mangrove sediments. Environ Microbiol 16:845–855CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gabarro J et al (2013) Nitrous oxide reduction genetic potential from the microbial community of an intermittently aerated partial nitritation SBR treating mature landfill leachate. Water Res 47:7066–7077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu Z et al (2008) Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers. Nucleic Acids Res 36, 10.1093/nar/gkn1491
  40. 40.
    Liu Z et al (2007) Short pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 35, 10.1093/nar/gkm1541
  41. 41.
    Youssef N et al (2009) Comparison of species richness estimates obtained using nearly complete fragments and simulated pyrosequencing-generated fragments in 16S rRNA gene-based environmental surveys. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5227–5236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2006) Toward a census of bacteria in soil. PLoS Comput Biol 2, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020092
  43. 43.
    DeSantis TZ et al (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5069–5072CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Quast C et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Struchtemeyer CG, Morrison MD, Elshahed MS (2012) A critical assessment of the efficacy of biocides used during the hydraulic fracturing process in shale natural gas wells. Int Biodeter Biodegr 71:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Muthukumar N et al (2003) Microbiologically influenced corrosion in petroleum product pipelines–a review. Indian J Exp Biol 41:1012–1022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fujioka RS (2002) Microbial indicators of coastal water quality. In: Hurst CJ, Crawford RL, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology, 2nd edn. ASM, Washington, DC, pp 234–243Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schrader C et al (2012) PCR inhibitors–occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol 113:1014–1026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Braid MD, Daniels LM, Kitts CL (2003) Removal of PCR inhibitors from soil DNA by chemical flocculation. J Microbiol Meth 52:389–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Miller D et al (1999) Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4715–4724PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Youssef NH, Elshahed MS, McInerney MJ (2009) Microbial processes in oil fields: Culprits, problems, and opportunities. Adv Appl Microbiol 66:141–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Agrawal A, Vanbroekhoven K, Lal B (2010) Diversity of culturable sulfidogenic bacteria in two oil–water separation tanks in the north-eastern oil fields of India. Anaerobe 16:12–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Obuekwe C, Westlake D (1987) Occurrence of bacteria in Pembina crude oil pipeline system and their potential role in corrosion process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 26:389–393Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Obuekwe C, Westlake D, Cook F (1983) Corrosion of Pembina crude oil pipeline. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 17:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Liang R et al (2014) Roles of thermophilic thiosulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea in the biocorrosion of oil pipelines. Front Microbiol 5, 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00089

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher G. Struchtemeyer
    • 1
  • Noha H. Youssef
    • 2
  • Mostafa S. Elshahed
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Health SciencesMcNeese State UniversityLake CharlesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Microbiology and Molecular GeneticsOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations