Skip to main content

Animal Models in Cancer Research: Assessment of Severity and the Application of Humane Endpoints

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Animal Models of Brain Tumors

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 77))

Abstract

Refinement is one of the three foundations of the 3Rs concept, a concept that underpins good animal-based research. For ethical and legal reasons, the severity of a procedure or an experiment on the welfare and health of an experimental animal needs to be estimated before starting the experiment. This estimation needs to be done for two main reasons. First, any inherent negative effects that a procedure or an experiment has on an experimental animal can be minimized by establishing humane endpoints. Second, the severity of all procedures in a scientific experiment contributes to the cumulative suffering that an experimental animal will experience during its lifespan. The aim of this chapter is to explain refinement and humane endpoints and their use in reducing the severity and thereby assure the welfare of an experimental animal while it participates in a scientific investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Parliament and the Council (2010) Directive 2010/63/EU of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. OJEU 20.10.2010 L 276: 33–79

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hawkins P, Dennison N, Goodman G, Hetherington S, Llywelyn-Jones S, Ryder K, Smith AJ (2011) Guidance on the severity classification of scientific procedures involving fish: report of a Working Group appointed by the Norwegian Consensus-Platform for the Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal experiments (Norecopa). Lab Anim 45:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchanan-Smith HM, Rennie AE, Vitale A, Pollo S, Prescott MJ, Morton DB (2005) Harmonising the definition of refinement. Anim Welfare 14:379–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Poole T (1997) Happy animals make good science. Lab Anim 31:116–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000) Guidance document on the recognition, assessment and use of clinical signs as humane endpoints for experimental animals used in safety evaluation. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/fulltext/9750191e.pdf?expires=1340025329&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=75EB34E03062C68DF9F7773FF5913A17

  6. Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) (1998) Guidelines on choosing an appropriate endpoint in experiments using animals for research teaching and testing. http://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Guidelines/Appropriate_endpoint.pdf

  7. Hendriksen CFM (2009) Replacement, reduction and refinement alternatives to animal use in vaccine potency measurement. Expert Rev. Vaccines 8:313–322. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/NTP/About_NTP/SACATM/2010/June/Materials/KeyReferences.pdf

  8. National Research Council of National Academies (2011). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th edn. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/Guide-for-the-Care-and-Use-of-Laboratory-Animals.pdf

  9. ILAR Journal V41(2) (2000) Humane endpoints for animals used in biomedical research and testing. http://dels-old.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarjournal/41_2/CancerResearch.shtml

  10. Workman P, Aboagye EO, Balkwill F, Balmain A, Bruder G, Chaplin DJ, Double JA, Everitt J, Farningham DAH, Glennie MJ, Kelland LR, Robinson V, Stratford IJ, Tozer GM, Watson S, Wedge SR, Eccles S et al (2010) An ad hoc committee of the National Cancer Research Institute. Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research. Br J Cancer 102:1555–1577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Humane endpoints in laboratory animal experimentation (webpage) http://www.humane-endpoints.info/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48&Itemid=27

  12. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) (1998) Guidelines for the welfare of animals in experimental neoplasia (2nd ed.). Br J Cancer 77(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pérez-Asensio F, De la Rosa X, Jiménez-Altayó F, Gorina R, Martínez E, Messeguer A, Vila E, Chamorro A, Planas AM (2010) Antioxidant CR-6 protects against reperfusion injury after a transient episode of focal brain ischemia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30:638–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Justicia C, Martín A, Rojas S, Gironella M, Cervera A, Panés J, Chamorro A, Planas AM (2006) Anti-VCAM-1 antibodies did not protect against ischemic damage neither in rats nor in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Redgate ES, Deutsch M, Boggs SS (1991) Time of death of CNS tumor-bearing rats can be reliably predicted by body weight-loss patterns. Lab Anim Sci 41(3):269–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Committee on Regulatory Issues in Animal Care and Use, Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council (2000). Definition of pain and distress and reporting requirements for laboratory animals: proceedings of the workshop held June 22. National Academy Press. ISBN-10: 0-309-07698-6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morton DB, Griffiths PH (1985) Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and a hypothesis for assessment. Vet Rec 116(16):431–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morton DB, Hau J (2010) Welfare assessment and human endpoints. In: Hau J, Schapiro S (eds) Handbook of laboratory animal science, vol I, 3rd edn. CRC Press, pp 535–572. ISBN: 978-1-4200-8455-9. e-Book ISBN: 978-1-4200-8456-6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement (2011) A guide to defining and implementing protocols for the welfare assessment of laboratory animals. Lab Anim 45(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Netherlands Inspectorate for Health Protection, Commodities and Veterinary Public Health (1999) Code of Practice on animal experiments in cancer research. http://www.proefdierkunde.nl/db/upload/documents/CofP_-_Cancer_Research.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author thanks Dr. Arieh Bomzon, ConsulWrite (www.consulwrite.com) for his scientific input and editorial assistance in preparing this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Orellana-Muriana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Orellana-Muriana, J.M. (2012). Animal Models in Cancer Research: Assessment of Severity and the Application of Humane Endpoints. In: Martínez Murillo, R., Martínez, A. (eds) Animal Models of Brain Tumors. Neuromethods, vol 77. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/7657_2012_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7657_2012_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-208-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-209-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics