Skip to main content

3D Decellularized Native Extracellular Matrix Scaffold for In Vitro Culture Expansion of Human Wharton’s Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hWJ MSCs)

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Decellularized Scaffolds and Organogenesis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1577))

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are derived from Wharton’s jelly tissue of the human umbilical cord. Given appropriate culture conditions, these cells can self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types across the lineages. Among the properties exhibited by these cells, immunomodulation through secretion of trophic factors has been widely exploited in a broad spectrum of preclinical/clinical regenerative applications. Moreover, the extracellular matrix is found to play a major role apart from niche cells in determining stem cell fate including that of MSCs. Therefore, the currently employed technique of two-dimensional culture expansion can alter the inherent properties of naïve MSCs originally residing within the three-dimensional space. This limitation can be overcome to some extent by using native extracellular matrix scaffold culture system which mimics the in situ microenvironment. In this chapter, we have elucidated the protocol for the preparation of a native extracellular matrix scaffold by decellularization of the MSC sheet and thereof culture expansion and characterization of human Wharton’s jelly-derived MSCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

αMEM:

Alpha modification of minimum essential medium

APC:

Allophycocyanin

CD:

Cluster of differentiation

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

DNase:

Deoxyribonuclease

DPX:

Distyrene-plasticizer-xylene

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

FACS:

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting

FITC:

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

hWJ MSCs:

Human Wharton’s jelly-derived MSCs

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

ITS:

Insulin-transferrin-selenium

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

μl:

Microliters

μM:

Micromoles

ml:

Milliliters

mM:

Millimoles

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PBST:

Phosphate buffered saline with Tween 20

PE:

Phycoerythrin

Pen-Strep:

Penicillin-Streptomycin

2D:

Two dimensional

3D:

Three dimensional

References

  1. Squillaro T, Peluso G, Galderisi U (2016) Clinical trials with mesenchymal stem cells: an update. Cell Transplant 25:829–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabapathy V, Sundaram B, VM S et al (2014) Human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells plasticity augments scar-free skin wound healing with hair growth. PLoS One 9:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Monsel A, Zhu Y, Gudapati V et al (2016) Mesenchymal stem cell derived secretome and extracellular vesicles for acute lung injury and other inflammatory lung diseases. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2598:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Watt FM, Huck WTS (2013) Role of the extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:467–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hynes RO (2009) Extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science 326:1216–1219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gattazzo F, Urciuolo A, Bonaldo P (2014) Extracellular matrix: a dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1840:2506–2519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li B, Moshfegh C, Lin Z et al (2013) Mesenchymal stem cells exploit extracellular matrix as mechanotransducer. Sci Rep 3:2425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kusuma GD, Carthew J, Lim R et al (2017) Effect of the microenvironment on mesenchymal stem cells paracrine signalling: opportunities to engineer the therapeutic effect. Stem Cells Dev 26(9):617–631. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2016.0349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM et al (2004) Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 6:483–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT et al (2010) Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:4872–4877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nam J, Johnson J, Lannutti JJ et al (2011) Modulation of embryonic mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation via control over pure mechanical modulus in electrospun nanofibers. Acta Biomater 7:1516–1524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YSJ et al (2009) Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:2130–2135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xing Q, Yates K, Tahtinen M et al (2015) Decellularization of fibroblast cell sheets for natural extracellular matrix scaffold preparation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 21:77–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu X, Zhou L, Chen X et al (2016) Culturing on decellularized extracellular matrix enhances antioxidant properties of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Mater Sci Eng C 61:437–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rakian R, Block TJ, Johnson SM et al (2015) Native extracellular matrix preserves mesenchymal stem cell “stemness” and differentiation potential under serum-free culture conditions. Stem Cell Res Ther 6:235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University Grants Commission (UGC) for granting Junior Research Fellowship (JRF)/Senior Research Fellowship (SRF) to Balasubramanian Sundaram. We would like to thank the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), India, for granting Ramalingaswami Fellowship and research support grant to Sanjay Kumar. We would like to thank Merylin Nixon, Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College Vellore Hospital, Vellore, India, for assisting us in obtaining umbilical cord tissue samples. We would like to appreciate the technical assistance provided by core facilities of Centre for Stem Cell Research, A unit of inStem Bengaluru, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Bagayam, Tamil Nadu, 632002, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Sundaram, B., Cherian, A.G., Kumar, S. (2017). 3D Decellularized Native Extracellular Matrix Scaffold for In Vitro Culture Expansion of Human Wharton’s Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hWJ MSCs). In: Turksen, K. (eds) Decellularized Scaffolds and Organogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1577. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2017_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2017_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7655-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7656-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics