Protein Sequence and Structure Analysis of Antibody Variable Domains

  • Andrew C. R. MartinEmail author
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)


The protocols described here provide methods for computational analysis of antibody sequence and structure. With the availability of the World Wide Web, many online analysis tools have been made available, and URLs for these are cited throughout the text. The author has provided a Web site at containing links to all the tools described here.


Numbering Scheme Canonical Classis Equivalent Residue Protein Databank Antibody Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abhinandan KR, Martin ACR (2008) Analysis and improvements to Kabat and structurally correct numbering of antibody variable domains. Mol Immunol 45:3832–3839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abhinandan KR, Martin ACR (in preparation) Analysis and prediction of VH/VL packing in antibodiesGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Lazikani B, Lesk AM, Chothia C (1997) Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. J Mol Biol 273:927–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allcorn LC, Martin ACR (2002) SACS-self-maintaining database of antibody crystal structure information. Bioinformatics 18:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alzari PM, Lascombe M-B, Poljak RJ (1988) Three-dimensional structure of antibodies. Annu Rev Immunol 6:555–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amit AG, Mariuzza RA, Phillips SEV, Poljak RJ (1985) Three-dimensional structure of an antigen–antibody complex at 6 Å resolution. Nature (London) 313:156–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucl Acids Res 28:235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brochet X, Lefranc M-P, Giudicelli V (2008) IMGT/V-QUEST: the highly customized and integrated system for IG and TR standardized V-J and V-D-J sequence analysis. Nucl Acids Res 36:W503–W508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M (1987) Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers 26:137–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chothia C, Janin J (1981) Relative orientation of close-packed β-pleated sheets in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4146–4150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chothia C, Lesk AM, Tramontano A, Levitt M, Smith-Gill SJ, Air G, Sheriff S, Padlan EA, Davies D, Tulip WR, Colman PM, Spinelli S, Alzari PM, Poljak RJ (1989) Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature (London) 342:877–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies DR, Padlan EA, Sheriff S (1990) Antibody–antigen complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 59:439–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deret S, Maissiat C, Aucouturier P, Chomilier J (1995) SUBIM: A program for analysing the Kabat database and determining the variability subgroup of a new immunoglobulin sequence. Comput Appl Biosci 11:435–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Edelman GM (1970) The covalent structure of a human γ-immunoglobulin: XI functional implications. Biochemistry 9:3197–3205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edelman GM, Gall WE (1969) The antibody problem. Annu Rev Biochem 38:415–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giudicelli V, Chaume D, Bodmer J, Müller W, Busin C, Marsh S, Bontrop R, Marc L, Malik A, Lefranc MP (1997) IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics database. Nucl Acids Res 25:206–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giudicelli V, Duroux P, Ginestoux C, Folch G, Jabado-Michaloud J, Chaume D, Lefranc M-P (2006) IMGT/LIGM-DB, the IMGT comprehensive database of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor nucleotide sequences. Nucl Acids Res 34:D781–D784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Honegger A, Plückthun A (2001) Yet another numbering scheme for immunoglobulin variable domains: an automatic modeling and analysis tool. J Mol Biol 309:657–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huber R, Bennett WS (1987) Antibody–antigen flexibility. Nature (London) 326:334–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kabat EA, Wu TT, Perry HM, Gottesman KS, Foeller C (1991) Sequences of proteins of immunological interest, 5th edn. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes for Health, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  21. Lefranc M-P, Pommié C, Ruiz M, Giudicelli V, Foulquier E, Truong L, Thouvenin-Contet V, Lefranc G (2003) IMGT unique numbering for immunoglobulin and T cell receptor variable domains and Ig superfamily V-like domains. Dev Comp Immunol 27:55–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lesk AM, Chothia C (1982) Evolution of proteins formed by β-sheets: II. The core of the immunoglobulin domains. J Mol Biol 160:325–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacCallum RM, Martin AC, Thornton JM (1996) Antibody–antigen interactions: Contact analysis and binding site topography. J Mol Biol 262:732–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mariuzza RA, Phillips SEV, Poljak RJ (1987) The structural basis of antigen–antibody recognition. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 16:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin ACR (1996) Accessing the Kabat antibody sequence database by computer. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 25:130–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin ACR, Thornton JM (1996) Structural families in homologous proteins: Automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies. J Mol Biol 263:800–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin ACR, Cheetham JC, Rees AR (1989) Modelling antibody hypervariable loops: A combined algorithm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:9268–9272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Padlan EA (1977) The structural basis for the specificity of antibody–antigen reactions and structural mechanisms for the diversification of antigen-binding specificities. Quant Rev Biophys 10:35–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Padlan EA (1994) Anatomy of the antibody molecule. Mol Immunol 31:169–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poljak RJ, Amzel LM, Avey HP, Chen BL, Phizackerley RP, Saul F (1973) The three-dimensional structure of the Fab′ fragment of a human immunoglobulin at 2.8 Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3305–3310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porter RR (1959) The hydrolysis of rabbit γ-globulin and antibodies with crystalline papain. Biochem J 73:119–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Saldanha JW, Martin AC, Léger OJ (1999) A single backmutation in the human κIV framework of a previously unsuccessfully humanized antibody restores the binding activity and increases the secretion in cos cells. Mol Immunol 36:709–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Searle SJ, Pedersen JT, Henry AH, Webster DM, Rees AR (1994) Antibody structure and function. In: Borreback CAK (ed) Antibody engineering. Oxford University Press, London, pp 3–51Google Scholar
  34. Sivasubramanian A, Sircar A, Chaudhury A, Gray JJ (2009) Toward high-resolution homology modeling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody–antigen docking. Proteins 74:497–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valentine RC, Green NM (1967) Electron microscopy of an antibody–hapten complex. J Mol Biol 27:615–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson IA, Stanfield RL (1993) Antibody–antigen interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 3:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu TT, Kabat EA (1970) An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity. J Exp Med 132:211–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Structural and Molecular BiologyDarwin Building, University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations