Interphase FISH: Detection of Intercellular Genomic Variations and Somatic Chromosomal Mosaicism

  • Ivan Y. IourovEmail author
  • Svetlana G. Vorsanova
  • Ilia V. Soloviev
  • Yuri B. YurovEmail author
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH) beautifully exemplifies what a molecular cytogenetic technique can offer in contrast to conventional cytogenetic approaches: the analysis of chromosomal DNA at all stages of the cell cycle. It has made it possible to study chromosome numbers and structure in almost all tissues of an organism. Furthermore, it enables the delineation of new phenomena such as intercellular genomic variations and the detection of chromosomal mosaicism, which is a difficult task for cytogeneticists. The aim of this chapter is to present a comprehensive I-FISH protocol for the detection of intercellular genomic variations and low-level chromosomal mosaicism in somatic tissues. Special attention is paid to several issues encountered during I-FISH analysis, mainly the specificity of the cell suspension preparation, the selection of a benchmark for defining a cell population as mosaic, differentiation between I-FISH artifacts, the specificity of chromosome intranuclear organization, and variations in chromosome numbers.


Interphase Nucleus Scion Image Software Chromosomal Mosaicism Interphase Chromosome Molecular Cytogenetic Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to express our gratitude to all our colleagues from our laboratories for their technical assistance, and to Dr. Thomas Liehr (Jena, Germany) for our longstanding collaboration, which has resulted in the elaboration of the ICS-MCB technique, as partially described here. Our work is supported by RGNF060600639a and Philip Morris USA, Inc.


  1. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW (2006) Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 7:85–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hsu LYF, Kaffe S, Jenkins EC, Alonso L, Benn PA, David K, Hirschhorn K, Lieber E, Shanske A, Shapiro LR, Schutta E, Warburton D (1992) Proposed guidelines for diagnosis of chromosome mosaicism in amniocytes based on data derived from chromosome mosaicism and pseudomo-saicism studies. Prenat Diagn 12:555–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Iourov IY, Soloviev IV, Vorsanova SG, Monakhov VV, Yurov YB (2005) An approach for quantitative assessment of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signals for applied human molecular cytogenetics. J Histochem Cytochem 53:401–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Iourov IY, Liehr T, Vorsanova SG, Kolotii AD, Yurov YB (2006a) Visualization of interphase chromosomes in postmitotic cells of the human brain by multicolour banding (MCB). Chromosome Res 14:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Pellestor F, Yurov YB (2006b) Brain tissue preparations for chromosomal PRINS labeling. Methods Mol Biol 334:123–132Google Scholar
  6. Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB (2006c) Chromosomal variation in mammalian neuronal cells: Known facts and attractive hypotheses. Int Rev Cytol 249:143–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB (2006d) Intercellular genomic (chromosomal) variations resulting in somatic mosaicism: Mechanisms and consequences. Curr Genomics 7:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iourov I Y, Liehr T, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB (2007) Interphase chromosome-specific multicolor banding (ICS-MCB): A new tool for analysis of interphase chromosomes in their integrity. Biomol Eng 24:415–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Liehr T, Claussen U (2002) Multicolor-FISH approaches for the characterization of human chromosomes in clinical genetics and tumor cytogenetics. Curr Genomics 3:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liehr T, Heller A, Starke H, Rubtsov N, Trifonov V, Mrasek K, Weise A, Kuechler A, Claussen U (2002) Microdissection based high resolution multicolor banding for all 24 human chromosomes. Int J Mol Med 9:335–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Los FJ, Van Opstal D, van den Berg C (2004) The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: A theoretical model. Hum Reprod Update 10:79–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rajagopalan H, Lengauer C (2004) Aneuploidy and cancer. Nature 432:338–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schinzel A (2001) Catalogue of unbalanced chromosome aberrations in man, 2nd edn. de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Soloviev I V, Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Fayet F, Roizes G, Malet P (1995) Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization of postreplicated cells with site-specific cosmid and cosmid contig probes. Prenat Diagn 15:237–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Soloviev IV, Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Marcais B, Rogaev EI, Kapanadze BI, Brodiansky VM, Yankovsky NK, Roizes G (1998) Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of ±-satellite DNA in cosmid libraries specific for human chromosomes 13, 21 and 22. Rus J Genet 34:1247–1255Google Scholar
  16. Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB, Ulas VY, Demidova IA, Kolotii AD, Gorbatchevskaia NL, Beresheva AK, Soloviev IV (2001) Cytogenetic and molecular-cytogenetic studies of Rett syndrome (RTT): A retrospective analysis of a Russian cohort of RTT patients (the investigation of 57 girls and three boys). Brain Dev 23:S196-S201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY, Beresheva AK, Demidova IA, Monakhov VV, Kravets VS, Bartseva OB, Goyko EA, Soloviev IV, Yurov YB (2005a) Non-disjunction of chromosome 21, alphoid DNA variation, and sociogenetic features of Down syndrome. Tsitol Genet 39:30–36Google Scholar
  18. Vorsanova SG, Kolotii AD, Iourov IY, Monakhov VV, Kirillova EA, Soloviev IV, Yurov YB (2005b) Evidence for high frequency of chromosomal mosaicism in spontaneous abortions revealed by interphase FISH analysis. J Histochem Cytochem 53:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolstenholme J (1996) Confined placental mosaicism for trisomies 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 16, and 22: Their incidence, likely origins, and mechanisms for cell lineage compartmentalization. Prenat Diagn 16:511–524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yurov YB, Soloviev IV, Vorsanova SG, Marcais B, Roizes G, Lewis R (1996) High resolution fluorescence in situ hybridization using cyanine and fluorescein dyes: Ultra-rapid chromosome detection by directly fluorescently labeled alphoid DNA probes. Hum Genet 97:390–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yurov YB, Iourov I Y, Monakhov VV, Soloviev IV, Vostrikov V V, Vorsanova SG (2005) The variation of aneuploidy frequency in the developing and adult human brain revealed by an interphase FISH study. J Histochem Cytochem 53:385–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yurov YB, Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, Kolotii AD, Kutsev SI, Pellestor F, Beresheva AK, Demidova IA, Kravets VS, Monakhov VV, Soloviev IV (2007a) Aneuploidy and confined chromosomal mosaicism in the developing human brain. PLoS ONE 2:e558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY, Demidova IA, Beresheva AK, Kravetz VS, Monakhov VV, Kolotii AD, Voinova-Ulas VY, Gorbachevskaya NL (2007b) Unexplained autism is frequently associated with low-level mosaic aneuploidy. J Med Genet 44:521–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yurov YB, Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Demidova IA, Kravetz VS, Beresheva AK, Kolotii AD, Monakchov VV, Uranova NA, Vostrikov VM, Soloviev IV, Liehr T (2008) The schizophrenia brain exhibits low-level aneuploidy involving chromosome 1. Schizophr Res 98:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Center of Mental HealthRussian Academy of Medical SciencesMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Institute of Pediatrics and Children Surgery, RosmedtechnologiiMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations