Advertisement

Peroxiredoxin Proteins as Building Blocks for Nanotechnology

  • Frankie Conroy
  • N. Amy YewdallEmail author
Protocol
  • 672 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2073)

Abstract

Peroxiredoxins are ubiquitous antioxidant proteins that exhibit a striking variety of quaternary structures, making them appealing building blocks with which nanoscale architectures are created for applications in nanotechnology. The solution environment of the protein, as well as protein sequence, influences the presentation of a particular structure, thereby enabling mesoscopic manipulations that affect arrangments at the nanoscale. This chapter will equip us with the knowledge necessary to not only produce and manipulate peroxiredoxin proteins into desired structures but also to characterize the different structures using dynamic light scattering, analytical centrifugation, and negative stain transmission electron microscopy, thereby setting the stage for us to use these proteins for applications in nanotechnology.

Key words

Protein Nanotechnology Peroxiredoxin Prx3 Protein engineering Self-assembly Dynamic light scattering Analytical ultracentrifugation Transmission electron microscopy Negative stain 

References

  1. 1.
    Gerrard JA (2013) Protein nanotechnology: what is it? In: Gerrard JA (ed) Protein nanotechnology: protocols, instrumentation, and applications, 2nd edn. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-354-1_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood ZA, Poole LB, Hantgan RR, Karplus PA (2002) Dimers to doughnuts: redox-sensitive oligomerization of 2-cysteine peroxiredoxins. Biochemistry 41:5493–5504.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi012173mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao Z, Roszak AW, Gourlay LJ, Lindsay JG, Isaacs NW (2005) Bovine mitochondrial peroxiredoxin III forms a two-ring catenane. Structure 13:1661–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2005.07.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meissner U, Schroder E, Scheffler D, Martin AG, Harris JR (2007) Formation, TEM study and 3D reconstruction of the human erythrocyte peroxiredoxin-2 dodecahedral higher-order assembly. Micron 38:29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2006.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips AJ et al (2014) Peroxiredoxin is a versatile self-assembling tecton for protein nanotechnology. Biomacromolecules 15:1871–1881.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm500261uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radjainia M et al (2015) Cryo-electron microscopy structure of human peroxiredoxin-3 filament reveals the assembly of a putative chaperone. Structure 23:912–920.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.03.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yewdall NA et al (2016) Structures of human peroxiredoxin 3 suggest self-chaperoning assembly that maintains catalytic state. Structure 24:1120–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2016.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saccoccia F et al (2012) Moonlighting by different stressors: crystal structure of the chaperone species of a 2-Cys peroxiredoxin. Structure 20:429–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2012.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Domigan LJ et al (2017) Formation of supramolecular protein structures on gold surfaces. Biointerphases 12:04E405.  https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4986053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yewdall NA, Allison TM, Pearce FG, Robinson CV, Gerrard JA (2018) Self-assembly of toroidal proteins explored using native mass spectrometry. Chem Sci 9(28):6099–6106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yewdall NA, Peskin AV, Hampton MB, Goldstone DC, Pearce FG, Gerrard JA (2018) Quaternary structure influences the peroxidase activity of peroxiredoxin 3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 497:558–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cox AG, Peskin AV, Paton LN, Winterbourn CC, Hampton MB (2009) Redox potential and peroxide reactivity of human peroxiredoxin 3. Biochemistry 48:6495–6501.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi900558gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hall A, Sankaran B, Poole LB, Karplus PA (2009) Structural changes common to catalysis in the Tpx peroxiredoxin subfamily. J Mol Biol 393:867–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Angelucci F et al (2013) Switching between the alternative structures and functions of a 2-Cys peroxiredoxin, by site-directed mutagenesis. J Mol Biol 425:4556–4568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conroy F, Rossi T, Ashmead H, Crowther JM, Mitra AK, Gerrard JA (2019) Engineering peroxiredoxin 3 to facilitate control over self-assembly. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 512(2):263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parsonage D, Youngblood DS, Sarma GN, Wood ZA, Karplus PA, Poole LB (2005) Analysis of the link between enzymatic activity and oligomeric state in AhpC, a bacterial peroxiredoxin. Biochemistry 44:10583–10592.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi050448iCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laer KV, Dick TP (2016) Utilizing natural and engineered peroxiredoxins as intracellular peroxide reporters. Mol Cells 39:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ardini M et al (2014) Metal-induced self-assembly of peroxiredoxin as a tool for sorting ultrasmall gold nanoparticles into one-dimensional clusters. Nanoscale 6:8052–8061.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr01526fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manuguri S, Webster K, Yewdall NA, An Y, Venugopal H, Bhugra V, Turner A, Domigan LJ, Gerrard JA, Williams DE, Malmström J (2018) Assembly of protein stacks with in situ synthesized nanoparticle cargo. Nano Lett 18(8):5138–5145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ardini M et al (2016) Supramolecular self-assembly of graphene oxide and metal nanoparticles into stacked multilayers by means of a multitasking protein ring. Nanoscale 8:6739–6753.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR08632ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blommel PG, Fox BG (2007) A combined approach to improving large-scale production of tobacco etch virus protease. Protein Expr Purif 55:53–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2007.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laue TM, Shah BD, Ridgeway TM, Pelletier SL (1992) Computer-aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins. In: Harding SE, Rowe AJ, Horton JC (eds) Analytical ultracentrifugation in biochemistry and polymer science. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 90–125Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schuck P, Rossmanith P (2000) Determination of the sedimentation coefficient distribution by least-squares boundary modeling. Biopolymers 54:328–341.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0282(20001015)54:5<328::AID-BIP40>3.0.CO;2-PCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khoshouei M et al (2016) Volta phase plate cryo-EM of the small protein complex Prx3. Nat Commun 7:10534.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knoops B, Loumaye E, Van Der Eecken V (2007) Evolution of the peroxiredoxins. Subcell Biochem 44:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soito L, Williamson C, Knutson ST, Fetrow JS, Poole LB, Nelson KJ (2011) PREX: PeroxiRedoxin classification indEX, a database of subfamily assignments across the diverse peroxiredoxin family. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D332–D337.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flohé L, Harris JR (2007) Peroxiredoxin systems: structures and functions. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Claiborne A (1985) Catalase activity. In: Greenwald AR (ed) Handbook of methods for oxygen radical research. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, pp 283–284Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayat MA (1981) In: Arnold E (ed) Principles and techniques of electron microscopy. Biological applications, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bozzola JJ, Russell LD (1999) Electron microscopy: principles and techniques for biologists. Jones & Bartlett Learning, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robinson DG, Ehlers U, Herken R, Herrmann B, Mayer F, Schürmann F-W (2012) Methods of preparation for electron microscopy: an introduction for the biomedical sciences. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nagy P et al (2011) Model for the exceptional reactivity of peroxiredoxins 2 and 3 with hydrogen peroxide–a kinetic and computational study. J Biol Chem 286:18048–18055.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.232355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poynton RA, Peskin AV, Haynes AC, Lowther WT, Hampton MB, Winterbourn CC (2016) Kinetic analysis of structural influences on the susceptibility of peroxiredoxins 2 and 3 to hyperoxidation. Biochem J 473:411–421.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20150572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yewdall NA (2017) Human peroxiredoxin 3: the shape-shifting peroxidase as a versatile protein tecton. University of Canterbury, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Bio-Organic ChemistryEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations