Advertisement

Phloem pp 387-395 | Cite as

Using a Mathematical Model of Phloem Transport to Optimize Strategies for Crop Improvement

  • Motohide Seki
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2014)

Abstract

It is valuable to set an ideotype plant structure (i.e., ideal numbers and arrangement of sucrose sources, sinks, and pathways that maximize crop yield) as a goal for breeding with modern and near-future technologies. However, it is not easy to theoretically specify an ideotype because multiple factors need to be considered simultaneously. Here a method to obtain plant ideotypes using a simple mathematical model is described. The model identifies plant structures with maximal yield through a series of simulations of the dynamic changes in sucrose concentration at different positions of the plant. Originally developed for rice, this revised method can be applied to a wide range of crop plants.

Key words

Breeding Crop ideotype Hagen–Poiseuille equation Murray’s law Pressure-flow hypothesis Carbon allocation Sucrose transport 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank F. G. Feugier, X. Song, M. Ashikari, H. Nakamura, K. Ishiyama, T. Yamaya, M. Inari-Ikeda, H. Kitano, and A. Satake for their help in developing the present model.

References

  1. 1.
    Donald CM (1968) The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17:385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, Nishimura A et al (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309:741–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melzer S, Lens F, Gennen J, Vanneste S, Rohde A, Beeckman T (2008) Flowering-time genes modulate meristem determinacy and growth form in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 40:1489–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Himeno M, Neriya Y, Minato N, Miura C, Sugawara K, Ishii Y et al (2011) Unique morphological changes in plant pathogenic phytoplasma-infected petunia flowers are related to transcriptional regulation of floral homeotic genes in an organ-specific manner. Plant J 67:971–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Münch E (1930) Die stoffbewegung in der pflanze. Fischer, Jena. (in German)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dewar RC (1993) A root–shoot partitioning model based on carbon–nitrogen–water interactions and Münch phloem flow. Funct Ecol 7:356–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Minchin PEH, Thorpe MR, Farrar JF (1993) A simple mechanistic model of phloem transport which explains sink priority. J Exp Bot 44:947–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daudet FA, Lacointe A, Gaudillère JP, Cruiziat P (2002) Generalized Münch coupling between sugar and water fluxes for modelling carbon allocation as affected by water status. J Theor Biol 214:481–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson MV, Holbrook NM (2003) Application of a single-solute non-steady-state phloem model to the study of long-distance assimilate transport. J Theor Biol 220:419–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lacointe A, Minchin PE (2008) Modelling phloem and xylem transport within a complex architecture. Funct Plant Biol 35:772–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hölttä T, Mencuccini M, Nikinmaa E (2009) Linking phloem function to structure: analysis with a coupled xylem–phloem transport model. J Theor Biol 259:325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seki M, Feugier FG, Song XJ, Ashikari M, Nakamura H, Ishiyama K et al (2014) A mathematical model of phloem sucrose transport as a new tool for designing rice panicle structure for high grain yield. Plant Cell Physiol 56:605–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Satake A, Seki M, Iima M, Teramoto T, Nishiura Y (2016) Florigen distribution determined by a source–sink balance explains the diversity of inflorescence structures in Arabidopsis. J Theor Biol 395:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ohara T, Satake A (2017) Photosynthetic entrainment of the circadian clock facilitates plant growth under environmental fluctuations: perspectives from an integrated model of phase oscillator and phloem transportation. Front Plant Sci 8:1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ikeda M, Hirose Y, Takashi T, Shibata Y, Yamamura T, Komura T et al (2010) Analysis of rice panicle traits and detection of QTLs using an image analyzing method. Breed Sci 60:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibon Y, Bläsing OE, Palacios-Rojas N, Pankovic D, Hendriks JH, Fisahn J et al (2004) Adjustment of diurnal starch turnover to short days: depletion of sugar during the night leads to a temporary inhibition of carbohydrate utilization, accumulation of sugars and post-translational activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in the following light period. Plant J 39:847–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX (2007) A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet 39:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Liu K, Wang P (2006) Post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in rice in relation to abscisic acid and ethylene. J Exp Bot 57:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lang A (1978) A model of mass flow in the phloem. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:535–546Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Durand M (2006) Architecture of optimal transport networks. Phys Rev E 73:016116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCulloh KA, Sperry JS, Adler FR (2003) Water transport in plants obeys Murray’s law. Nature 421:939–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carvalho MR, Losada JM, Niklas KJ (2018) Phloem networks in leaves. Curr Opin Plant Biol 43:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Motohide Seki
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of DesignKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations