Advertisement

Intracellular Assays to Monitor Survival and Growth of Yersinia pestis Within Macrophages

  • Amanda R. Pulsifer
  • Tiva T. VanCleave
  • Matthew B. LawrenzEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2010)

Abstract

Yersinia pestis is able to survive and replicate within macrophages, while also being able to live in the extracellular milieu of the host. Assays that facilitate better understanding of how Y. pestis survives intracellularly and subverts normal host antimicrobial defenses require the ability to monitor intracellular Y. pestis survival and replication. In this chapter three different assays for monitoring intracellular survival and replication will be described, along with the formulas and methods to quantify and present the acquired data. These assays are fundamental to answering a multitude of questions pertaining to which bacterial factors are important for intracellular survival. Additionally, these assays can be used, with modifications, for other intracellular pathogens of interest. The first assay discussed will be the conventional bacterial enumeration assay, which quantifies bacterial numbers directly through a classic colony forming units (CFU) assay. Quantifying bacterial burden through CFU determination allows for differentiation between intracellular/cell-associated bacteria and extracellular bacteria. However, CFU determination is laborious, does not allow for direct kinetic monitoring of bacterial growth, and is difficult to adapt to high throughput assays. Bioluminescence bioreporters that use luciferase to monitor bacterial numbers allow for simple, plate reader-based, real-time kinetic monitoring of bacterial growth that is amendable to high throughput techniques. Finally, we will describe live cell microscopy using fluorescent bioreporters, which allows for monitoring of bacterial replication in individual cells and the possibility to visualize interactions between bacterial and host proteins during intracellular infection.

Key words

Intracellular bacteria Macrophages Plague Live cell microscopy Bioluminescence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the James Graham Brown Cancer Center Confocal Imaging Core and Center for Predictive Medicine for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases for resources and technical support. Funding support was from NIAID (AI119557, AI097608) and NIGMS (GM125504) to M.B.L.

References

  1. 1.
    Straley SC, Harmon PA (1984) Growth in mouse peritoneal macrophages of Yersinia pestis lacking established virulence determinants. Infect Immun 45(3):649–654PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spinner JL, Winfree S, Starr T, Shannon JG, Nair V, Steele-Mortimer O, Hinnebusch BJ (2014) Yersinia pestis survival and replication within human neutrophil phagosomes and uptake of infected neutrophils by macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 95:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oyston PCF, Dorrell N, Williams K, Li S-R, Green M, Titball RW, Wren BW (2000) The response regulator PhoP is important for survival under conditions of macrophage-induced stress and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Infect Immun 68(6):3419–3425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozue J, Mou S, Moody KL, Cote CK, Trevino S, Fritz D, Worsham P (2011) The role of the phoPQ operon in the pathogenesis of the fully virulent CO92 strain of Yersinia pestis and the IP32953 strain of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Microb Pathog 50:314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ye Z, Kerschen EJ, Cohen DA, Kaplan AM, van Rooijen N, Straley SC (2009) Gr1+ cells control growth of YopM-negative Yersinia pestis during systemic plague. Infect Immun 77(9):3791–3806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponnusamy D, Clinkenbeard KD (2012) Yersinia pestis intracellular parasitism of macrophages from hosts exhibiting high and low severity of plague. PLoS One 7(7):e42211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pachulec E, Abdelwahed Bagga RB, Chevallier L, O’Donnell H, Guillas C, Jaubert J, Montagutelli X, Carniel E, Demeure CE (2017) Enhanced macrophage M1 polarization and resistance to apoptosis enable resistance to plague. J Infect Dis 216:761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Connor MG, Pulsifer AR, Chung D, Rouchka EC, Ceresa BK, Lawrenz MB (2018) Yersinia pestis targets the host endosome recycling pathway during the biogenesis of the Yersinia-containing vacuole to avoid killing by macrophages. MBio 9(1):e01800-17Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pujol C, Klein KA, Romanov GA, Palmer LE, Cirota C, Zhao Z, Bliska JB (2009) Yersinia pestis can reside in autophagosomes and avoid xenophagy in murine macrophages by preventing vacuole acidification. Infect Immun 77(6):2251–2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pujol C, Bliska JB (2003) The ability to replicate in macrophages is conserved between Yersinia pestis and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Infect Immun 71(10):5892–5899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    VanCleave TT, Pulsifer AR, Connor MG, Lawrenz MB (2017) Impact of gentamicin concentration and exposure time on intracellular Yersinia pestis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun Y, Connor MG, Pennington JM, Lawrenz MB (2012) Development of bioluminescent bioreporters for in vitro and in vivo tracking of Yersinia pestis. PLoS One 7(10):e47123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nham T, Filali S, Danne C, Derbise A, Carniel E (2012) Imaging of bubonic plague dynamics by in vivo tracking of bioluminescent Yersinia pestis. PLoS One 7(4):e34714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sha J, Rosenzweig JA, Kirtley ML, van Lier CJ, Fitts EC, Kozlova EV, Erova TE, Tiner BL, Chopra AK (2013). A non-invasive in vivo imaging system to study dissemination of bioluminescent Yersinia pestis CO92 in a mouse model of pneumonic plague. Microb Pathog, 55, 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ray A, Dittel BN (2010) Isolation of mouse peritoneal cavity cells. J Vis Exp 35:1488.  https://doi.org/10.3791/1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda R. Pulsifer
    • 1
  • Tiva T. VanCleave
    • 1
  • Matthew B. Lawrenz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Predictive Medicine for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious DiseasesUniversity of Louisville School of MedicineLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations