Advertisement

Measurement of β-Arrestin Recruitment at GPCRs Using the Tango Assay

  • Geneviève Laroche
  • Patrick M. GiguèreEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1947)

Abstract

Intracellular signal transduced by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is tightly controlled by a guanine nucleotide-binding complex made of G protein Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, as well as a growing array of regulatory and accessory proteins such as arrestins. G protein-independent β-arrestin recruitment at GPCRs is universally accepted as the canonical interactor system and it has been found to be a powerful tracker of most GPCRs activation. Pharmacological concepts have evolved remarkably after the finding that different ligands, binding at the same receptor, can selectively activate specific subsets of signaling pathways among all pathways activated by balanced ligands. This new paradigm referred to as functional selectivity or biased signaling, has opened new avenues for the design of tailored drugs with enhanced therapeutic efficacies and reduced side effects. Here, we describe a unique platform for the interrogation of GPCR using a transcriptional-based assay to measure transient β-arrestin recruitment called Tango.

Key words

G protein-coupled receptor β-Arrestin Cell-based assay Tango GPCRs signaling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP142219.

References

  1. 1.
    Luttrell LM, Gesty-Palmer D (2010) Beyond desensitization: physiological relevance of arrestin-dependent signaling. Pharmacol Rev 62(2):305–330.  https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.109.002436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Katritch V, Cherezov V, Stevens RC (2013) Structure-function of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 53:531–556.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-032112-135923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Urban JD, Clarke WP, von Zastrow M, Nichols DE, Kobilka B, Weinstein H, Javitch JA, Roth BL, Christopoulos A, Sexton PM, Miller KJ, Spedding M, Mailman RB (2007) Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320(1):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.106.104463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kroeze WK, Sassano MF, Huang XP, Lansu K, McCorvy JD, Giguere PM, Sciaky N, Roth BL (2015) PRESTO-Tango as an open-source resource for interrogation of the druggable human GPCRome. Nat Struct Mol Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnea G, Strapps W, Herrada G, Berman Y, Ong J, Kloss B, Axel R, Lee KJ (2008) The genetic design of signaling cascades to record receptor activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(1):64–69.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710487105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jordan M, Schallhorn A, Wurm FM (1996) Transfecting mammalian cells: optimization of critical parameters affecting calcium-phosphate precipitate formation. Nucleic Acids Res 24(4):596–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baker JM, Boyce FM (2014) High-throughput functional screening using a homemade dual-glow luciferase assay. J Vis Exp (88).  https://doi.org/10.3791/50282

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations