Using Mechanistic Models for Analysis of Proteomic Data

  • Lily A. ChylekEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1945)


A goal of systems biology is to develop an integrated picture of how the myriad components of a biological system work together to produce responses to environmental inputs. Achieving this goal requires (1) assembling a list of the component parts of a cellular regulatory system, and (2) understanding how the connections between these components enable information processing. To work toward these ends, a number of methods have matured in parallel. The compilation of a cellular parts list has been accelerated by the advent of omics technologies, which enable simultaneous characterization of a large collection of biomolecules. A particular type of omics technology that is useful for understanding protein-protein interaction networks is proteomics, which can give information about a number of dimensions of the state of the cell’s proteins: quantification of protein abundances within the cell, characterization of the posttranslational modification state of the proteome through phosphopeptide enrichment, and identification of protein-protein interactions through co-immunoprecipitation. Mathematical models can be useful in analyzing proteomic data.

Key words

Systems biology Mass spectrometry MS-based proteomics Rule-based modeling 


  1. 1.
    Kitano H (2002) Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295:1662–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B (2003) Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aldridge BB, Burke JM, Lauffenburger DA, Sorger PK (2006) Physicochemical modelling of cell signalling pathways. Nat Cell Biol 8:1195–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lander AD (2010) The edges of understanding. BMC Biol 8:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mendes P, Camacho D, de la Fuente A (2005) Modelling and simulation for metabolomics data analysis. Biochem Soc Trans 33:1427–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pawson T, Nash P (2003) Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 300:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox J, Mann M (2011) Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu Rev Biochem 80:273–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chylek LA, Stites EC, Posner RG, Hlavacek WS (2013) Innovations of the rule-based modeling approach. In: Prokop A, Csukás B (eds) Systems biology: integrative biology and simulation tools. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chylek LA, Harris LA, Tung CS, Faeder JR, Lopez CF, Hlavacek WS (2014) Rule-based modeling: a computational approach for studying biomolecular site dynamics in cell signaling systems. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 6:13–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chylek LA, Harris LA, Faeder JR, Hlavacek WS (2015) Modeling for (physical) biologists: an introduction to the rule-based approach. Phys Biol 12:045007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sneddon MW, Faeder JR, Emonet T (2011) Efficient modeling, simulation and coarse-graining of biological complexity with NFsim. Nat Methods 8:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chylek LA, Hu B, Blinov ML, Emonet T, Faeder JR, Goldstein B, Gutenkunst RN, Haugh JM, Lipniacki T, Posner RG, Yang J, Hlavacek WS (2011) Guidelines for visualizing and annotating rule-based models. Mol BioSyst 7:2779–2795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tiger CF, Krause F, Cedersund G, Palmér R, Klipp E, Hohmann S, Kitano H, Krantz M (2012) A framework for mapping, visualisation and automatic model creation of signal-transduction network. Mol Syst Biol 8:578Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Misirli G, Cavaliere M, Waites W, Pocock M, Madsen C, Gilfellon O, Honorato-Zimmer R, Zuliani P, Danos V, Wipat A (2016) Annotation of rule-based models with formal semantics to enable creation, analysis, reuse and visualization. Bioinformatics 32:908–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thomas BR, Chylek LA, Colvin J, Sirimulla S, Clayton AHA, Hlavacek WS, Posner RG (2016) BioNetFit: a fitting tool compatible with BioNetGen, NFsim and distributed computing environments. Bioinformatics 32:798–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chylek LA, Akimov V, Dengjel J, Rigbolt KT, Hu B, Hlavacek WS, Blagoev B (2014) Phosphorylation site dynamics of early T-cell receptor signaling. PLoS One 9:e104240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stites EC, Aziz M, Creamer MS, Von Hoff DD, Posner RG, Hlavacek WS (2015) Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets. Biophys J 108:1819–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Systems PharmacologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations