Advertisement

Primary Recovery of Yeast Culture Supernatant for Recombinant Protein Purification

  • Michael M. MaurerEmail author
  • Harald Schillinger
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1923)

Abstract

The harvest of a bench scale high cell density fermentation of Pichia pastoris, using standard laboratory equipment, to process products from supernatant is described. The process consists of a centrifugation step and a depth filtration, followed by a (sterile) membrane filtration. The procedure yields supernatant ready for the next purification step such as chromatography.

Key words

Centrifugation Depth filtration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Robin Ott, Karl Metzger, and Frederik Hoppe for the execution of some of the experiments outlined in this chapter and Nico Lingg for critical discussion. This work has been supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW), the Federal Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and Technology (bmvit), the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG), the Standortagentur Tirol, the Government of Lower Austria, and ZIT—Technology Agency of the City of Vienna through the Austrian FFG-COMET-Funding Program.

References

  1. 1.
    Mattanovich D, Graf A, Stadlmann J, Dragosits M, Redl A, Maurer M, Kleinheinz M, Sauer M, Altmann F, Gasser B (2009) Genome, secretome and glucose transport highlight unique features of the protein production host Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Factories 8(1):29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stephenne J (1990) Production in yeast versus mammalian cells of the first recombinant DNA human vaccine and its proved safety, efficacy, and economy: hepatitis B vaccine. Adv Biotechnol Process 14:279–299Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meyer HP, Schmidhalter DR (2014) Industrial scale suspension culture of living cells. Wiley-Blackwell, Weinheim ISBN:978-3-527-33547-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doran PM (2013) Bioprocess engineering principles. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA ISBN:978-0-08-091770-2Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richardson JF, Harker JF, Backhurst JR, Coulson JM (2002) (first published 2002) Coulson and Richardson’s chemical engineering. In: Particle technology and separation processes, vol 2. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richardson JF, Harker JF, Backhurst JR, Coulson JM (2002) Chapter 9: Centrifugal separations. In: Chemical engineering (first published). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 475–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Varga EG, Titchener-Hooker NJ, Dunnill P (2001) Prediction of the pilot-scale recovery of a recombinant yeast enzyme using integrated models. Biotechnol Bioeng 74(2):96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shukla AA, Etzel MR, Gadam S (2007) Process scale bioseparations for the biopharmaceutical industry. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    3M™ Zeta Plus™ ZB Series Filters. Meriden, USA, 2016Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baldwin WW, Kubitschek HE (1984) Buoyant density variation during the cell cycle in microorganisms. J Bacteriol 158(2):701–704PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alfa Laval (2014) Disc stack separator technology. BrochureGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FH Campus Wien - University of Applied SciencesViennaAustria
  2. 2.Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (acib)ViennaAustria
  3. 3.3M Separation and Purification Sciences Division (SPSD), 3M Österreich GmbHViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations