Advertisement

A Method for Zebrafish Follicle Transplantation into Recipient Mothers for the Generation of Fertilizable Eggs and Viable Offspring

  • Zsolt Csenki
  • Ferenc MuellerEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1920)

Abstract

In zebrafish and other externally developing animals, maternal effect gene products significantly contribute to embryonic and larval development. Several methods exist for both forward and reverse genetic manipulation of maternal gene products, yet it remains technically difficult to interfere with maternal gene products. Therefore, alternative methods to manipulate maternal factors in oocytes remain of interest. Here we describe a method which allows manipulation and subsequent transplantation of stage I–II follicles of zebrafish into recipient mothers where donor oocytes can develop into mature eggs and produce viable offspring. Additionally, we describe a simple microinjection protocol for injecting reporter constructs into follicles as a proxy for manipulating maternal effect genes.

Key words

Oogenesis Follicle Transplantation Transgenic Maternal effect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The publication of this chapter is supported by the EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00008 project co-financed by the European Union and the European Social Fund. The authors thank Francisco J. Pelegri for critical reading of this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Newport J, Kirschner M (1982) A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 30:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kane DA, Kimmel CB (1993) The zebrafish midblastula transition. Dev 119:447–456Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abrams EW, Mullins MC (2009) Early zebrafish development: it's in the maternal genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19(4):396–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White RJ, Collins JE, Sealy IM, Wali N, Dooley CM, Digby Z et al (2017) A high-resolution mRNA expression time course of embryonic development in zebrafish. elife 16:6Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pelegri F, Dekens MP, Schulte-Merker S, Maischein HM, Weiler C, Nüsslein-Volhard C (2004) Identification of recessive maternal-effect mutations in the zebrafish using a gynogenesis-based method. Dev Dyn 231:324–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dosch R, Wagner DS, Mintzer KA, Runke G, Wiemelt AP, Mullins MC (2004) Maternal control of vertebrate development before the midblastula transition: mutants from the zebrafish I. Dev Cell 6:771–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gritsman K, Zhang J, Cheng S, Heckscher E, Talbot WS, Schier AF (1999) The EGF-CFC protein one-eyed pinhead is essential for nodal signaling. Cell 97:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciruna B, Weidinger G, Knaut H, Thisse B, Thisse C, Raz E et al (2002) Production of maternal-zygotic mutant zebrafish by germ-line replacement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:14919–14924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blitz IL, Margaret BF, Cho KWY (2016) Leapfrogging: primordial germ cell transplantation permits recovery of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations in essential genes. Dev 143(15):2868–2875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Csenki Z, Zaucker A, Kovács B, Hadzhiev Y, Hegyi Á, Lefler KK, Müller T et al (2009) Intraovarian transplantation of stage I-II follicles results in viable zebrafish embryos. IJDB 54(4):585–589Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Selman K, Wallace RA, Sarka A, Qi X (1993) Stages of oocyte development in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. J Morph 218(2):203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Department of AquacultureInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Szent István UniversityGödöllőHungary
  2. 2.Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations