Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bone
This chapter describes methods for preparing samples of bone and bone cells for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Backscattered electron (BSE) imaging is by far the most useful in the bone field, followed by secondary electrons (SE) and the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analytical modes. Samples may have 3D detail in a 3D surface, or be topography-free, polished or micromilled, resin-embedded block surfaces, or resin casts of space compartments surrounded by bone matrix. Methods for cells include fixation, drying, looking at undersides of bone cells, and metallic conductive coating. Maceration with alkaline bacterial pronase, hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium or potassium hydroxide to remove cells and unmineralized matrix is described in detail. Attention is given especially to methods for 3D BSE SEM imaging of bone samples. Recommendations are made for the types of resin embedding for BSE SEM imaging. Correlated confocal and SEM imaging of PMMA embedded bone requires the use of glycerol to coverslip. Cathodoluminescence (CL) mode SEM imaging is an alternative for visualizing fluorescent mineralizing front labels such as calcein and tetracyclines. Making spatial casts from PMMA or other resin-embedded samples is an important use of this material. Correlation with other imaging means, including microradiography and microtomography is important. Shipping wet bone samples between labs is best done in glycerol. Control of the vacuum pressure in the SEM sample chamber (now generally available) can be used to eliminate “charging” problems which were common, for example, with large, complex, cancellous bone samples.
Key wordsMineralization Morphology Osteoporosis Osteoarthritis Mouse genetics
I thank Maureen Arora for her patient help in carrying out procedures described in this chapter on many thousands of samples and many colleagues who have helped to check this revision. Philippe Clezardin provided the sample shown in Fig. 8.
- 5.Boyde A (2008) Low kV and video-rate, beam-tilt stereo for viewing live-time experiments in the SEM Chap. 7 pp. 197–214 and colour plates 4–11. In: Schatten H, Pawley JB (eds) Biological low voltage scanning electron microscopy. Springer, New York ISBN 978-0-387-72970-1Google Scholar
- 7.Boyde A (1984) Methodology of calcified tissue specimen preparation for scanning electron microscopy. In: Dickson GR (ed) Methods of calcified tissue preparation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 251–307Google Scholar
- 9.Boyde A, Jones SJ (1983) Scanning electron microscopy of cartilage. In: Hall BK (ed) Cartilage I: 105–148. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 12.Robards AW, Wilson AJ (eds) (1992) Protocols in electron microscopy. Wiley, Chichester [the whole book is a very valuable protocols resource]Google Scholar
- 15.Boyde A, Davis GR, Mills D, Zikmund T, Cox TM, Adams VL, Niker A, Wilson PJ, Dillon JP, Ranganath LR, Jeffery N, Jarvis JC, Gallagher JA (2014b) On fragmenting, densely mineralised acellular protrusions into articular cartilage and their possible role in osteoarthritis. J Anat 225:436–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Boyde A (1975) A method for the preparation of cell surfaces hidden within bulk tissue for examination in the scanning electron microscope. In: Scanning electron microscopy. Illinois Inst Tec Res, Chicago, pp 295–304Google Scholar
- 19.Boyde A, Maconnachie E (1983) Not quite critical point drying. In: Revel JP, Barnard T, Haggis GH (eds) Science of biological specimen preparation. SEM Inc, AMF O’Hare, IL, pp 71–75Google Scholar
- 20.Boyde A, Bailey E, Jones SJ, Tamarin A (1977) Dimensional changes during specimen preparation for scanning electron microscopy. Scan Electron Microsc 1:507–518Google Scholar
- 23.Bassett JHD, Gogakos A, White JK, Evans H, Jacques RM, van der Spek AH, Project SMG, Ramirez-Solis R, Ryder E, Sunter D, Boyde A, Campbell MJ, Croucher PI, Williams GR (2012) Rapid-throughput skeletal phenotyping of 100 knockout mice identifies 9 new genes that determine bone strength. PLoS Genet 8(8):e1002858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Boyde A, Ali NN, Jones SJ (1985) Optical and scanning electron microscopy in the single osteoclast resorption assay. Scan Electron Microsc 3:1259–1271Google Scholar
- 32.Doube M, Firth EC, Boyde A (2005) Registration of confocal scanning laser microscopy and quantitative backscattered electron images for the temporospatial quantification of mineralization density in 18-month old thoroughbred racehorse articular calcified cartilage. Scanning 27:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar