Advertisement

Autoantibodies pp 197-203 | Cite as

Determination of Autoantibodies to Transglutaminase by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Assay

  • Zhiyuan Zhao
  • Yong Gu
  • Dongmei Miao
  • Eric Hoffmeyer
  • Yu Liu
  • Liping Yu
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1901)

Abstract

Appearance of autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase (TGA) is the most reliable biomarker to identify celiac disease autoimmunity. A nonradioactive assay of determination of TGA was newly developed using electrochemiluminescence (ECL) technology. This ECL assay has been demonstrated to be more sensitive than current standard radio-binding assay (RBA) in detecting TGA and can detect TGA earlier among high-risk young children followed from birth.

Key words

Celiac disease Tissue transglutaminase Autoantibodies ECL assay 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by JDRF grant 2-SRA-2015-51-Q-R, NIH grant DK32083 and DK32493.

Disclosures The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Dubé C, Rostom A, Sy R et al (2005) The prevalence of celiac disease in average-risk and at-risk Western European populations: a systematic review. Gastroenterology 128:S57–S67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T et al (2003) Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 163:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lohi S, Mustalahti K, Kaukinen K et al (2007) Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26:1217–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Myléus A, Ivarsson A, Webb C et al (2009) Celiac disease revealed in 3% of Swedish 12-year-olds born during an epidemic. J Pediat Gastroenterol Nutrit 49:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B et al (2010) Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med 42:530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dydensborg S, Toftedal P, Biaggi M et al (2012) Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease in Denmark: a linkage study combining national registries. Acta Paediatr 101:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agardh D, Nilsson A, Tuomi T et al (2001) Prediction of silent celiac disease at diagnosis of childhood type 1 diabetes by tissue transglutaminase autoantibodies and HLA. Pediatr Diabetes 2:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ch’ng CL, Jones MK, Kingham JG (2007) Celiac disease and autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Med Res 5:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norström F, Sandström O, Lindholm L, Ivarsson A (2012) A gluten-free diet effectively reduces symptoms and health care consumption in a Swedish celiac disease population. BMC Gastroenterol 12:125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Viljamaa M, Kaukinen K, Huhtala H et al (2005) Coeliac disease, autoimmune diseases and gluten exposure. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guariso G, Conte S, Presotto F et al (2007) Clinical, subclinical and potential autoimmune diseases in an Italian population of children with coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26:1409–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kagnoff MD (2006) AGA Institute medical position statement on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 131:1977–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiang JL, Kirkman MS, Laffel LMB, Peters AL (2014) Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 37:2034–2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó IR et al (2012) ESPGHAN Working Group on Coeliac Disease Diagnosis; ESPGHAN Gastroenterology Committee; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediat Gastroenterol Nutrit 54:136–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li M, Yu L, Tiberti C, Bonamico M et al (2009) A report on the international transglutaminase autoantibody workshop for celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 104:154–163 PMID: 19098864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao Z, Miao D, Waugh K et al (2016) Higher sensitivity and earlier identification of celiac disease autoimmunity by a nonradioactive assay for transglutaminase autoantibodies. J Immunol Res 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2904563
  17. 17.
    Rewers M, Bugawan TL, Norris JM et al (1996) Newborn screening for HLA markers associated with IDDM: diabetes autoimmunity study in the young (DAISY). Diabetologia 39:807–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hagopian WA, Erlich H, Lernmark Å et al (2011) The environmental determinants of diabetes in the young (TEDDY): genetic criteria and international diabetes risk screening of 421000 infants. Pediatr Diabetes 12:733–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu L, Miao D, Scrimgeour L, Johnson K et al (2012) Distinguishing persistent insulin autoantibodies with differential risk: nonradioactive bivalent proinsulin/insulin autoantibody assay. Diabetes 61:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miao D, Guyer KM, Dong F et al (2013) GAD65 autoantibodies detected by electrochemiluminescence assay identify high risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 62:4174–4178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu L (2015) Islet autoantibody detection by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay. Methods Mol Biol:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2015_296 Springer eBook, Humana Press

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiyuan Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yong Gu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Dongmei Miao
    • 1
  • Eric Hoffmeyer
    • 1
  • Yu Liu
    • 2
  • Liping Yu
    • 1
  1. 1.Barbara Davis Center for Childhood DiabetesUniversity of ColoradoAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Department of EndocrinologyThe Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityJilinChina
  3. 3.Department of EndocrinologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations