Advertisement

Collection and Analysis of Environmental Risk Perception Data

  • Henrique Fernandes Magalhães
  • Regina Célia da Silva Oliveira
  • Ivanilda Soares Feitosa
  • Ulysses Paulino AlbuquerqueEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

People perceive and represent the environment that surrounds them through physical, psychological, and cultural filters, which enables them to understand the scenarios and environmental changes that occur in their environment. Many of these changes, however, can be interpreted as potentially adverse situations, that is, as risks. The analysis of risk perception can be a very useful tool in ethnobiological studies, in the search for a better understanding of environmental problems perceived and faced locally. Different methods and techniques can be used in the collection and analysis of environmental risk perception data. In this chapter, we present the interview, the stimulus with drawings, participatory risk mapping and the richness indexes and risk sharing perceived as resources that can be used to evaluate the environmental risks perceived by a particular social group.

Key words

Ethnobiology Environmental risk perception Data collection 

References

  1. 1.
    Bell S (2001) Landscape pattern, perception and visualization in the visual management of forest. Lands Urb Plan 54:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Okamoto J (2002) Percepção ambiental e comportamental. Mackenzie, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    García-Mira R, Real JE (2005) Environmental perception and cognitive maps. Int J Psychol 40(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith K, Barrett CB, Box PW (2000) Participatory risk mapping for targeting research and assistance: with an example from east African pastoralists. World Dev 28:1945–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sjöberg L (2000) Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal 20:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sjöberg L (2000) The methodology of risk perception research. Qual Quant 34:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2009) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: risk and poverty in a changing climate. UNISDR, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinn CH, Huby M, Kiwasila H, Lovett JC (2003) Local perceptions of risk to livelihood in semi-arid Tanzania. J Environ Manag 68:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campos M, Velásquez A, Mccall M (2014) Adaptation strategies to climatic variability: a case study small-scale farmers in rural Mexico. Land Use Policy 38:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang S, Cao W (2015) Climate change perspectives in an Alpine area, Southwest China: acase analysis of local residents’ views. Ecol Indic 53:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Albuquerque UP, Ramos MA, Lucena RFP, Alencar NL (2014) Methods and techniques used to collect ethnobiological data. In: Albuquerque UP, da Cunha LVF C, RFP L, RRN A (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Springer protocols handbooks. Humana Press, New York, pp 15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    United Nations Children’s Fund (2008) Climate change and children: a human security challenge. Policy Review Paper. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence. Available from: http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/ climate_change.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2018
  13. 13.
    Barraza L (1999) Children’s drawings about the environment. Environ Educ Res 5(1):49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hume C, Salmon J, Ball K (2005) Children’s perception of their home and neighborhood environments, and their association with objectively measured physical activity: a qualitative and quantitative study. Health Educ Res 20(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor H, Peace R (2015) Children and cultural influences in a natural disaster: flood response in Surakarta, Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 13:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pellier A, Well JA, Abram NK, Gaveau D, Meijaard E (2014) Through the eyes of children: perceptions of environmental change in tropical forests. PLoS One 9(8):e103005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silva TC, Chaves LS, Albuquerque UP (2016) What is environmental perception? In: Albuquerque UP, RRN A (eds) Introduction to ethnobiology. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oliveira RCS, Schmidt IB, Conceição AA (2013) Uso e conhecimento do candombá. 1ª ed, Feira de Santana, Editora UEFS 1, 38pGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baird TD, Leslie PW, Mccabe JT (2009) The effect of wildlife conservation on local perceptions of risk and behavioral response. Hum Ecol 37:463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Silva TC, Cruz MP, TAS A, Schwarz ML, Albuquerque UP (2014) Methods in research of environmental perception. In: Albuquerque UP, da Cunha LVF C, RFP L, RRN A (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, New York, pp 99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith K, Barrett CB, Box PW (2001) Not necessarily in the same boat: heterogeneous risk assessment among east african pastoralists. J Dev Stud 37:51–30Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silva TC, Ferreira WS Jr, Santoro FR, Araújo TAS, Albuquerque UP (2016) Risk perception. In: Albuquerque UP, Alves RRN (eds) Introduction to ethnobiology. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oliveira RCS, Albuquerque UP, Silva TLL, Ferreira WS Jr, Chaves LS, Araújo EL (2017) Religiousness/spirituality do not necessarily matter: effect on risk perception and adaptative strategies in the semi-arid region of NE Brazil. Glob Ecol Conserv 11:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Araújo TAS, Almeida ALS, Melo JG, Medeiros MFT, Ramos MA, Silva RRV, Almeida CFCBR, Albuquerque UP (2012) A new technique for testing distribution of knowledge and to estimate sampling sufficiency in ethnobiology studies. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 8:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrique Fernandes Magalhães
    • 1
  • Regina Célia da Silva Oliveira
    • 1
  • Ivanilda Soares Feitosa
    • 1
  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Etnobiologia e Conservação da NaturezaUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas Socioecológicos, Departamento de Botânica, Centro de BiociênciasUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations