Advertisement

Studying YAP-Mediated 3D Morphogenesis Using Fish Embryos and Human Spheroids

  • Yoichi Asaoka
  • Hitoshi Morita
  • Hiroko Furumoto
  • Carl-Philipp Heisenberg
  • Makoto Furutani-Seiki
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1893)

Abstract

The transcription coactivator, Yes-associated protein (YAP), which is a nuclear effector of the Hippo signaling pathway, has been shown to be a mechano-transducer. By using mutant fish and human 3D spheroids, we have recently demonstrated that YAP is also a mechano-effector. YAP functions in three-dimensional (3D) morphogenesis of organ and global body shape by controlling actomyosin-mediated tissue tension. In this chapter, we present a platform that links the findings in fish embryos with human cells. The protocols for analyzing tissue tension-mediated global body shape/organ morphogenesis in vivo and ex vivo using medaka fish embryos and in vitro using human cell spheroids represent useful tools for unraveling the molecular mechanisms by which YAP functions in regulating global body/organ morphogenesis.

Key words

Tissue tension 3D morphogenesis YAP Medaka Zebrafish Mutant Human spheroid 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hiroshi Nishina (Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan), Hisato Kondoh (Kyoto Sangyo University, Japan), and other collaborators for the Kyoto medaka mutant screening. The research of gravity and YAP was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 16H01643, 16H01644, and 17H05769. Yoichi Asaoka and Hitoshi Morita contributed equally to this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Porazinski S, Wang H, Asaoka Y, Behrndt M, Miyamoto T, Morita H et al (2015) YAP is essential for tissue tension to ensure vertebrate 3D body shape. Nature 521:217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Furutani-Seiki M, Sasado T, Morinaga C, Suwa H, Niwa K, Yoda H et al (2004) A systematic genome-wide screen for mutations affecting organogenesis in Medaka, Oryzias latipes. Mech Dev 121:647–658Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furutani-Seiki M, Wittbrodt J (2004) Medaka and zebrafish, an evolutionary twin study. Mech Dev 121:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watanabe T, Asaka S, Kitagawa D, Saito K, Kurashige R, Sasado T et al (2004) Mutations affecting liver development and function in Medaka, Oryzias latipes, screened by multiple criteria. Mech Dev 121:791–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nelson CM, Bissell MJ (2006) Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22:287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA (2014) Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:802–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halder G, Dupont S, Piccolo S (2012) Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13:591–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calvo F, Ege N, Grande-Garcia A, Hooper S, Jenkins RP, Chaudhry SI et al (2013) Mechanotransduction and YAP-dependent matrix remodelling is required for the generation and maintenance of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 15:637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butcher DT, Alliston T, Weaver VM (2009) A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 9:108–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antoni D, Burckel H, Josset E, Noel G (2015) Three-dimensional cell culture: a breakthrough in vivo. Int J Mol Sci 16:5517–5527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heisenberg CP, Bellaïche Y (2013) Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 153:948–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Porazinski SR, Wang H, Furutani-Seiki M (2011) Essential techniques for introducing medaka to a zebrafish laboratory—towards the combined use of medaka and zebrafish for further genetic dissection of the function of the vertebrate genome. Methods Mol Biol 770:211–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maître JL, Berthoumieux H, Krens SF, Salbreux G, Jülicher F, Paluch E et al (2012) Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 338:253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoichi Asaoka
    • 1
  • Hitoshi Morita
    • 2
  • Hiroko Furumoto
    • 4
  • Carl-Philipp Heisenberg
    • 3
  • Makoto Furutani-Seiki
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Systems Biochemistry in Pathology and RegenerationYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineYamaguchiJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory for Developmental Biology, Center for Medical Education and Sciences, Graduate School of Medical SciencesUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
  3. 3.IST AustriaKlosterneuburgAustria
  4. 4.Department of Systems Biochemistry in Pathology and RegenerationYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineYamaguchiJapan

Personalised recommendations