Advertisement

Utilization of a Detergent-Based Method for Direct Microbial Cellular Lysis/Proteome Extraction from Soil Samples for Metaproteomics Studies

  • Karuna Chourey
  • Robert L. Hettich
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1841)

Abstract

Soil metaproteomics is a rapidly developing and rather complex field aimed at understanding the functionalities of soil microbial communities. One of the main challenges of such an approach is the availability of a robust and efficient protocol to extract proteins from soil microbes inhabiting this complex matrix. The wide range of soil types and the innumerable variations in soil properties confound this experimental goal. Here we present a detergent based, heat-assisted cellular lysis method coupled with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation of soil microbial proteins that has been developed in our lab and found to be reasonably robust and unbiased in extracting microbial proteins from a broad range of soils for downstream mass spectrometric characterizations of microbial metabolic activities in natural ecosystems.

Key words

Soil proteomics Metaproteomics Protein extraction Biological mass spectrometry Soil protein extraction Cell lysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Karuna Chourey and Robert L. Hettich acknowledge funding support from US Department of Energy, Genome Sciences Program. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the US Department of Energy.

References

  1. 1.
    Abram F (2015) Systems-based approaches to unravel multi-species microbial community functioning. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 13:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    von Bergen M, Jehmlich N, Taubert M, Vogt C, Bastida F, Herbst FA, Schmidt F, Richnow HH, Seifert J (2013) Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology. ISME J 7(10):1877–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hettich RL, Pan C, Chourey K, Giannone RJ (2013) Metaproteomics: harnessing the power of high performance mass spectrometry to identify the suite of proteins that control metabolic activities in microbial communities. Anal Chem 85(9):4203–4214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elsas JD, Jansson JK, Trevors JT (2006) Modern soil microbiology books in soils, plants, and the environment, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nannipieri P (ed) (2006) Role of stabilised enzymes in microbial ecology and enzyme extraction from soil with potential applications in soil proteomics, vol 8. Nucleic acids and proteins in soil. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solaiman Z, Kashem MA, Matsumoto I (2007) Environmental proteomics: extraction and identification of protein in soil, vol 2. Soil biology, advanced techniques in soil microbiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bastida F, Moreno JL, Nicolas C, Hernandez T, Garcia C (2009) Soil metaproteomics: a review of an emerging environmental science. Significance, methodology and perspectives. Eur J Soil Sci 60:845–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becher D, Bernhardt J, Fuchs S, Riedel K (2013) Metaproteomics to unravel major microbial players in leaf litter and soil environments: challenges and perspectives. Proteomics 13(18–19):2895–2909Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ogunseitan OA (ed) (2006) Soil proteomics: extraction and analysis of proteins from soils, vol 8. Nucleic acid and proteins in soil. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chourey K, Jansson J, VerBerkmoes N, Shah M, Chavarria KL, Tom LM, Brodie EL, Hettich RL (2010) Direct cellular lysis/protein extraction protocol for soil metaproteomics. J Proteome Res 9(12):6615–6622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benndorf D, Balcke GU, Harms H, Bergen MV (2007) Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater. ISME J 1:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen S, Rillig MC, Wang W (2009) Improving soil protein extraction for metaproteome analysis and glomalin-related soil protein detection. Proteomics 9(21):4970–4973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schulze WX, Gleixner G, Kaiser K, Guggenberger G, Mann M, Schulze ED (2005) A proteomic fingerprint of dissolved organic carbon and of soil particles. Oecologia 142:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor EB, Williams MA (2010) Microbial protein in soil: influence of extraction method and C amendment on extraction and recovery. Microb Ecol 59:390–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benndorf D, Vogt C, Jehmlich N, Schmidt Y, Thomas H, Woffendin G, Shevchenko A, Richnow HH, Bergen MV (2009) Improving protein extraction and separation methods for investigating the metaproteome of anaerobic benzene communities within sediments. Biodegradation 20:737–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waldrop MP, Firestone MK (2006) Seasonal dynamics of microbial community composition and function in oak canopy and open grassland soils. Microb Ecol 52:470–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lau MC, Stackhouse BT, Layton AC, Chauhan A, Vishnivetskaya TA, Chourey K, Ronholm J, Mykytczuk NC, Bennett PC, Lamarche-Gagnon G, Burton N, Pollard WH, Omelon CR, Medvigy DM, Hettich RL, Pfiffner SM, Whyte LG, Onstott TC (2015) An active atmospheric methane sink in high Arctic mineral cryosols. ISME J 9(8):1880–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Glass JB, Yu H, Steele JA, Dawson KS, Sun S, Chourey K, Pan C, Hettich RL, Orphan VJ (2014) Geochemical, metagenomic and metaproteomic insights into trace metal utilization by methane-oxidizing microbial consortia in sulphidic marine sediments. Environ Microbiol 16(6):1592–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Handley KM, VerBerkmoes NC, Steefel CI, Williams KH, Sharon I, Miller CS, Frischkorn KR, Chourey K, Thomas BC, Shah MB, Long PE, Hettich RL, Banfield JF (2013) Biostimulation induces syntrophic interactions that impact C, S and N cycling in a sediment microbial community. ISME J 7(4):800–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bastida F, Hernandez T, Garcia C (2014) Metaproteomics of soils from semiarid environment: functional and phylogenetic information obtained with different protein extraction methods. J Proteome 101:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nissen S, Liu X, Chourey K, Hettich RL, Wagner DD, Pfiffner SM, Loffler FE (2012) Comparative c-type cytochrome expression analysis in Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans strain 2CP-C grown with soluble and insoluble oxidized metal electron acceptors. Biochem Soc Trans 40(6):1204–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharma R, Dill BD, Chourey K, Shah M, VerBerkmoes NC, Hettich RL (2012) Coupling a detergent lysis/cleanup methodology with intact protein fractionation for enhanced proteome characterization. J Proteome Res 11(12):6008–6018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chourey K, Nissen S, Vishnivetskaya T, Shah M, Pfiffner S, Hettich RL, Loffler FE (2013) Environmental proteomics reveals early microbial community responses to biostimulation at a uranium- and nitrate-contaminated site. Proteomics 13(18–19):2921–2930Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LabOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations