Advertisement

Characterization of Ice-Binding Proteins from Sea-Ice Microalgae

  • Maddalena Bayer-GiraldiEmail author
  • EonSeon Jin
  • Peter W. Wilson
Protocol
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2156)

Abstract

Several species of polar microalgae are able to live and thrive in the extreme environment found within sea ice, where ice crystals may reduce the organisms’ living space and cause mechanical damage to the cells. Among the strategies adopted by these organisms to cope with the harsh conditions in their environment, ice-binding proteins (IBPs) seem to play a key role and possibly contribute to the success of microalgae in sea ice. Indeed, IBPs from microalgae predominantly belong to the so-called “DUF 3494-IBP” family, which today represents the most widespread IBP family. Since IBPs have the ability to control ice crystal growth, their mechanism of function is of interest for many potential applications. Here, we describe methods for a classical determination of the IBP activity (thermal hysteresis, recrystallization inhibition) and further methods for protein activity characterization (ice pitting assay, determination of the nucleating temperature).

Key words

Sea-ice microalgae Diatoms Ice-binding proteins Antifreeze Thermal hysteresis (TH) Clifton nanoliter osmometer Ice recrystallization inhibition (IRI) Recrystallometer Pitting assay Nucleation Supercooling Lag time 

References

  1. 1.
    Weeks WF, Ackley SF (1982) The growth, structure, and properties of sea ice. In: CRREL monograph. U.S. Army, Hanover, NH, p 82Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maykut GA (1986) The surface heat and mass balance. In: Untersteiner N (ed) NATO ASI series. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 396–463Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eicken H (1992) The role of sea ice in structuring Antarctic ecosystems. Polar Biol 12:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox GFN, Weeks WF (1983) Equation for determining the gas and brine volumes in sea-ice samples. J Glaciol 29:306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lizotte MP (2001) The contributions of sea ice algae to Antarctic marine primary production. Am Zool 41:57–73Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bar-Dolev M, Braslavsky I, Davies PL (2016) Ice-binding proteins and their function. Annu Rev Biochem 85:515–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vance TDR, Bayer-Giraldi M, Davies PL et al (2019) Ice-binding proteins and the ‘domain of unknown function’ 3494 family. FEBS J 286:855–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanada Y, Nishimiya Y, Miura A et al (2014) Hyperactive antifreeze protein from an Antarctic sea ice bacterium Colwellia sp. has a compound ice-binding site without repetitive sequences. FEBS J 281:3576–3590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mangiagalli M, Bar-Dolev M, Tedesco P et al (2017) Cryo-protective effect of an ice-binding protein derived from Antarctic bacteria. FEBS J 284:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vance TDR, Graham LA, Davies PL (2018) An ice-binding and tandem β-sandwich domain-containing protein in Shewanella frigidimarina is a potential new type of ice adhesin. FEBS J 285:1511–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janech MG, Krell A, Mock T et al (2006) Ice-binding proteins from sea ice diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol 42:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim M, Gwak Y, Jung WS et al (2017) Identification and characterization of an isoform antifreeze protein from the Antarctic marine diatom, Chaetoceros neogracile and suggestion of the core region. Mar Drugs 15:318–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bayer-Giraldi M, Sazaki G, Nagashima K et al (2018) Growth suppression of ice crystal basal face in the presence of a moderate ice-binding protein does not confer hyperactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:7479–7484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiao N, Hanada Y, Seki H et al (2014) Annealing condition influences thermal hysteresis of fungal type ice-binding proteins. Cryobiology 68:159–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hashim NHF, Sulaiman S, Bakar FDA et al (2014) Molecular cloning, expression and characterisation of Afp4, an antifreeze protein from Glaciozyma antarctica. Polar Biol 37:1495–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng J, Hanada Y, Miura A et al (2016) Hydrophobic ice-binding sites confer hyperactivity of an antifreeze protein from a snow mold fungus. Biochem J 473:4011–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raymond JA, deVries AL (1977) Adsorption inhibition as a mechanism of freezing resistance in polar fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74:2589–2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kristiansen E, Zachariassen KE (2005) The mechanism by which fish antifreeze proteins cause thermal hysteresis. Cryobiology 51:262–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zepeda S, Yokoyama E, Uda Y et al (2008) In situ observation of antifreeze glycoprotein kinetics at the ice interface reveals a two-step reversible adsorption mechanism. Cryst Growth Des 8:3666–3672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mochizuki K, Molinero V (2018) Antifreeze glycoproteins bind reversibly to ice via hydrophobic groups. J Am Chem Soc 140:4803–4811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Celik Y, Drori R, Pertaya-Braun N et al (2013) Microfluidic experiments reveal that antifreeze proteins bound to ice crystals suffice to prevent their growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:1309–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hudait A, Odendahl N, Qiu Y et al (2018) Ice-nucleating and antifreeze proteins recognize ice through a diversity of anchored clathrate and ice-like motifs. J Am Chem Soc 140:4905–4912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kondo H, Mochizuki K, Bayer-Giraldi M (2018) Multiple binding modes of a moderate ice-binding protein from a polar microalga. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:25295–25303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bayer-Giraldi M, Weikusat I, Besir H et al (2011) Characterization of an antifreeze protein from the polar diatom Fragilariopsis cylindrus and its relevance in sea ice. Cryobiology 63:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raymond JA, Sullivan CW, deVries AL (1994) Release of an ice-active substance by Antarctic sea ice diatoms. Polar Biol 14:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guo S, Stevens CA, Vance TDR et al (2017) Structure of a 1.5-MDa adhesin that binds its Antarctic bacterium to diatoms and ice. Sci Adv 3:e1701440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Do H, Lee JH, Lee SG et al (2012) Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of an ice-binding protein (FfIBP) from Flavobacterium frigoris PS1. Acta Crystallogr Sect F: Struct Biol Cryst Commun 68:806–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mangiagalli M, Sarusi G, Kaleda A et al (2018) Structure of a bacterial ice binding protein with two faces of interaction with ice. FEBS J 285:1653–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    deVries AL, Wohlschlag DE (1969) Freezing resistance in some Antarctic fishes. Science 163:1073–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Knight C (2000) Adding to the antifreeze agenda. Nature 406:249–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Celik Y, Graham LA, Mok Y-F et al (2010) Superheating of ice crystals in antifreeze protein solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:5423–5428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Braslavsky I, Drori R (2013) LabVIEW-operated novel nanoliter osmometer for ice binding protein investigations. J Vis Exp 72:4189Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Knight CA, Wierzbicki A (2001) Adsorption of biomolecules to ice and their effects upon ice growth. 2. A discussion of the basic mechanism of “antifreeze” phenomena. Cryst Growth Des 1:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raymond J, Wilson P, de Vries AL (1989) Inhibition of growth of nonbasal planes in ice by fish antifreezes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:881–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Raymond JA, Janech MG, Fritsen C (2009) Novel ice-binding proteins from a psychrophilic Antarctic alga (Chlamydomonadaceae, Chlorophyceae). J Phycol 45:130–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barlow TW, Haymet ADJ (1995) ALTA: an automated lag-time apparatus for studying nucleation of supercooled liquids. Rev Sci Instrum 66:2996–3007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wilson PW, Lu W, Xu H et al (2012) Inhibition of ice nucleation by slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS). Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wilson PW, Heneghan AF, Haymet ADJ (2003) Ice nucleation in Nature: supercooling point measurement and the role of heterogeneous nucleation. Cryobiology 46:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wilson PW, Osterday KE, Heneghan AF et al (2010) Type I antifreeze proteins enhance ice nucleation above certain concentrations. J Biol Chem 285:34741–34745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilson PW, Haymet ADJ (2009) Effect of solutes on the heterogeneous nucleation temperature of supercooled water: an experimental determination. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:2679–2682CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maddalena Bayer-Giraldi
    • 1
    Email author
  • EonSeon Jin
    • 2
  • Peter W. Wilson
    • 3
  1. 1.Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine ResearchAlfred Wegener InstituteBremerhavenGermany
  2. 2.Hanyang UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations