Advertisement

History and Trends of 3D Bioprinting

  • Patrick ThayerEmail author
  • Hector Martinez
  • Erik Gatenholm
Protocol
  • 118 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2140)

Abstract

The field of bioprinting is rapidly evolving as researchers innovate and drive the field forward. This chapter provides a brief overview of the history of bioprinting from the first described printer system in the early 2000s to present-day relatively inexpensive commercially available units and considers the current state of the field and emerging trends, including selected applications and techniques.

Key words

3D bioprinting 4D bioprinting Cell printing Tissue engineering Biomaterials Bioinks 

References

  1. 1.
    Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR (2003) Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 21(4):157–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roth EA, Xu T, Das M, Gregory C, Hickman JJ, Boland T (2004) Inkjet printing for high-throughput cell patterning. Biomaterials 25(17):3707–3715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu T, Jin J, Gregory C, Hickman JJ, Boland T (2005) Inkjet printing of viable mammalian cells. Biomaterials 26(1):93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mironov V, Visconti RP, Kasyanov V, Forgacs G, Drake CJ, Markwald RR (2009) Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials 30(12):2164–2174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, Forgacs G (2009) Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 30(30):5910–5917.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moldovan NI, Hibino N, Nakayama K (2017) Principles of the Kenzan method for robotic cell spheroid-based three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 23(3):237–244.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pages E, Remy M, Keriquiel V, Correa M, Guillotin B, Guillemot F (2015) Creation of highly defined mesenchymal stem cell patterns in three dimensions by laser-assisted bioprinting. J Nanotechnol Eng Med 6(2):21006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breslin S, O’Driscoll L (2016) The relevance of using 3D cell cultures, in addition to 2D monolayer cultures, when evaluating breast cancer drug sensitivity and resistance. Oncotarget 7(29):45745–45756.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9935CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Begley CG, Ellis LM (2012) Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483(7391):531–533.  https://doi.org/10.1038/483531aCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breslin S, O’Driscoll L (2013) Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 18(5–6):240–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun T, Jackson S, Haycock JW, MacNeil S (2006) Culture of skin cells in 3D rather than 2D improves their ability to survive exposure to cytotoxic agents. J Biotechnol 122(3):372–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.12.021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamada KM, Cukierman E (2007) Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell 130(4):601–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Griffith LG, Swartz MA (2006) Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7(3):211–224.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2016) A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 34(3):312–319.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):773–785.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bartold PM, McCulloch CA, Narayanan AS, Pitaru S (2000) Tissue engineering: a new paradigm for periodontal regeneration based on molecular and cell biology. Periodontol 24:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7(6):679–689.  https://doi.org/10.1089/107632701753337645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aubin H, Nichol JW, Hutson CB, Bae H, Sieminski AL, Cropek DM, Akhyari P, Khademhosseini A (2010) Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials 31(27):6941–6951.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.056CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo C, Kaufman LJ (2007) Flow and magnetic field induced collagen alignment. Biomaterials 28(6):1105–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Butcher AL, Offeddu GS, Oyen ML (2014) Nanofibrous hydrogel composites as mechanically robust tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 32(11):564–570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.09.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thayer PS, Verbridge SS, Dahlgren LA, Kakar S, Guelcher SA, Goldstein AS (2016) Fiber/collagen composites for ligament tissue engineering: influence of elastic moduli of sparse aligned fibers on mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 104(8):1894–1901.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fernandez-Vicente M, Calle W, Ferrandiz S, Conejero A (2016) Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing. 3D Print Addit Manufact 3(3):183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lubombo C, Huneault M (2018) Effect of infill patterns on the mechanical performance of lightweight 3D-printed cellular PLA parts. Mater Today Commun 17:214–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maiullari F, Costantini M, Milan M, Pace V, Chirivi M, Maiullari S, Rainer A, Baci D, Marei HE, Seliktar D, Gargioli C, Bearzi C, Rizzi R (2018) A multi-cellular 3D bioprinting approach for vascularized heart tissue engineering based on HUVECs and iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Sci Rep 8(1):13532.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31848-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tijore A, Irvine SA, Sarig U, Mhaisalkar P, Baisane V, Venkatraman S (2018) Contact guidance for cardiac tissue engineering using 3D bioprinted gelatin patterned hydrogel. Biofabrication 10(2):025003.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaa15dCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsukamoto Y, Akagi T, Shima F, Akashi M (2017) Fabrication of orientation-controlled 3D tissues using a layer-by-layer technique and 3D printed a thermoresponsive gel frame. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 23(6):357–366.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karande TS, Ong JL, Agrawal CM (2004) Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing. Ann Biomed Eng 32(12):1728–1743.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-004-7825-2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Homan KA, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott MA, Herrmann J, Obuobi H, Moisan A, Lewis JA (2016) Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on Perfusable chips. Sci Rep 6:34845.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34845CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu H, Zhou H, Lan H, Liu T, Liu X, Yu H (2017) 3D printing of artificial blood vessel: study on multi-parameter optimization design for vascular molding effect in alginate and gelatin. Micromachines (Basel) 8(8):237.  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8080237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Byron A, Randles MJ, Humphries JD, Mironov A, Hamidi H, Harris S, Mathieson PW, Saleem MA, Satchell SC, Zent R, Humphries MJ, Lennon R (2014) Glomerular cell cross-talk influences composition and assembly of extracellular matrix. J Am Soc Nephrol 25(5):953–966.  https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013070795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coulouarn C, Corlu A, Glaise D, Guenon I, Thorgeirsson SS, Clement B (2012) Hepatocyte-stellate cell cross-talk in the liver engenders a permissive inflammatory microenvironment that drives progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 72(10):2533–2542.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jobling P, Pundavela J, Oliveira SM, Roselli S, Walker MM, Hondermarck H (2015) Nerve-Cancer cell cross-talk: a novel promoter of tumor progression. Cancer Res 75(9):1777–1781.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bourget JM, Kerouredan O, Medina M, Remy M, Thebaud NB, Bareille R, Chassande O, Amedee J, Catros S, Devillard R (2016) Patterning of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells by laser-assisted bioprinting to study cell migration. Biomed Res Int 2016:3569843.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3569843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huang TQ, Qu X, Liu J, Chen S (2014) 3D printing of biomimetic microstructures for cancer cell migration. Biomed Microdevices 16(1):127–132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-013-9812-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Jia W, Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Shin SR, Tamayol A, Khademhosseini A (2017) Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater 6(16).  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700015
  36. 36.
    Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, Yue K, Zhu K, Liu W, Pi Q, Byambaa B, Dokmeci MR, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A (2016) Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials 106:58–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee VK, Kim DY, Ngo H, Lee Y, Seo L, Yoo SS, Vincent PA, Dai G (2014) Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bio-printing technology. Biomaterials 35(28):8092–8102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.083CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee VK, Lanzi AM, Haygan N, Yoo SS, Vincent PA, Dai G (2014) Generation of multi-scale vascular network system within 3D hydrogel using 3D bio-printing technology. Cell Mol Bioeng 7(3):460–472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-014-0340-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cui H, Zhu W, Nowicki M, Zhou X, Khademhosseini A, Zhang LG (2016) Hierarchical fabrication of engineered vascularized bone biphasic constructs via dual 3D bioprinting: integrating regional bioactive factors into architectural design. Adv Healthc Mater 5(17):2174–2181.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Arnold F, West DC (1991) Angiogenesis in wound healing. Pharmacol Ther 52(3):407–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-7258(91)90034-jCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Steed DL (1997) The role of growth factors in wound healing. Surg Clin North Am 77(3):575–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70569-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bier E, De Robertis EM (2015) Embryo development. BMP gradients: a paradigm for morphogen-mediated developmental patterning. Science 348(6242):aaa5838.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Naba A, Clauser KR, Ding H, Whittaker CA, Carr SA, Hynes RO (2016) The extracellular matrix: tools and insights for the “omics” era. Matrix Biol 49:10–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2015.06.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Devreotes P, Horwitz AR (2015) Signaling networks that regulate cell migration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(8):a005959.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Haeger A, Wolf K, Zegers MM, Friedl P (2015) Collective cell migration: guidance principles and hierarchies. Trends Cell Biol 25(9):556–566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.06.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Faia-Torres AB, Guimond-Lischer S, Rottmar M, Charnley M, Goren T, Maniura-Weber K, Spencer ND, Reis RL, Textor M, Neves NM (2014) Differential regulation of osteogenic differentiation of stem cells on surface roughness gradients. Biomaterials 35(33):9023–9032.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang L, Li Y, Huang G, Zhang X, Pingguan-Murphy B, Gao B, Lu TJ, Xu F (2016) Hydrogel-based methods for engineering cellular microenvironment with spatiotemporal gradients. Crit Rev Biotechnol 36(3):553–565.  https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.993588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang PY, Clements LR, Thissen H, Tsai WB, Voelcker NH (2015) Screening rat mesenchymal stem cell attachment and differentiation on surface chemistries using plasma polymer gradients. Acta Biomater 11:58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Han F, Zhou F, Yang X, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Yuan X (2015) A pilot study of conically graded chitosan-gelatin hydrogel/PLGA scaffold with dual-delivery of TGF-beta1 and BMP-2 for regeneration of cartilage-bone interface. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103(7):1344–1353.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Samavedi S, Vaidya P, Gaddam P, Whittington AR, Goldstein AS (2014) Electrospun meshes possessing region-wise differences in fiber orientation, diameter, chemistry and mechanical properties for engineering bone-ligament-bone tissues. Biotechnol Bioeng 111(12):2549–2559.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho DW, Derby B, Gelinsky M, Heilshorn SC, Jungst T, Malda J, Mironov VA, Nakayama K, Ovsianikov A, Sun W, Takeuchi S, Yoo JJ, Woodfield TBF (2018) A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication 11(1):013001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Williams D, Thayer P, Martinez H, Gatenholm E, Khademhosseini A (2018) A perspective on the physical, mechanical and biological specifications of bioinks and the development of functional tissues in 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting 9:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT (2017) The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv 35(2):217–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, Martinez Avila H, Hagg D, Gatenholm P (2015) 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 16(5):1489–1496.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Holzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, Van Vlierberghe S, Gu L, Ovsianikov A (2016) Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 8(3):032002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hilderbrand AM, Ovadia EM, Rehmann MS, Kharkar PM, Guo C, Kloxin AM (2016) Biomaterials for 4D stem cell culture. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 20(4):212–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2016.03.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Miao S, Cui H, Nowicki M, Lee SJ, Almeida J, Zhou X, Zhu W, Yao X, Masood F, Plesniak MW, Mohiuddin M, Zhang LG (2018) Photolithographic-stereolithographic-tandem fabrication of 4D smart scaffolds for improved stem cell cardiomyogenic differentiation. Biofabrication 10(3):035007.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aabe0bCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Castro NJ, Meinert C, Levett P, Hutmacher D (2017) Current developments in multifunctional smart materials for 3D/4D bioprinting. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ong CS, Nam L, Ong K, Krishnan A, Huang CY, Fukunishi T, Hibino N (2018) 3D and 4D bioprinting of the myocardium: current approaches, challenges, and future prospects. Biomed Res Int 2018:6497242.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6497242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kim S, Laschi C, Trimmer B (2013) Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends Biotechnol 31(5):287–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Majiki C (2014) Soft robotics: a perspective—current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot 1(1):5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wehner M, Truby RL, Fitzgerald DJ, Mosadegh B, Whitesides GM, Lewis JA, Wood RJ (2016) An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536(7617):451–455.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lee H, Cho DW (2016) One-step fabrication of an organ-on-a-chip with spatial heterogeneity using a 3D bioprinting technology. Lab Chip 16(14):2618–2625.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc00450dCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Knowlton S, Yenilmez B, Tasoglu S (2016) Towards single-step biofabrication of organs on a Chip via 3D printing. Trends Biotechnol 34(9):685–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhang YS, Arneri A, Bersini S, Shin SR, Zhu K, Goli-Malekabadi Z, Aleman J, Colosi C, Busignani F, Dell’Erba V, Bishop C, Shupe T, Demarchi D, Moretti M, Rasponi M, Dokmeci MR, Atala A, Khademhosseini A (2016) Bioprinting 3D microfibrous scaffolds for engineering endothelialized myocardium and heart-on-a-chip. Biomaterials 110:45–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bhise NS, Manoharan V, Massa S, Tamayol A, Ghaderi M, Miscuglio M, Lang Q, Shrike Zhang Y, Shin SR, Calzone G, Annabi N, Shupe TD, Bishop CE, Atala A, Dokmeci MR, Khademhosseini A (2016) A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids. Biofabrication 8(1):014101.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, Lewis JA (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(12):3179–3184.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521342113CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Thayer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hector Martinez
    • 1
  • Erik Gatenholm
    • 1
  1. 1.CELLINK LLCCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations