Advertisement

Using Bioengineered Bioluminescence to Track Stem Cell Transplantation In Vivo

  • Dong Han
  • Joseph C. WuEmail author
Protocol
  • 120 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2126)

Abstract

Bioluminescence imaging enables the real-time detection and tracking of engrafted cells in vivo noninvasively and dynamically. By detecting and quantifying the photons released from the oxidation of luciferin catalyzed by luciferase enzymes, this approach has proven effective in tracking engrafted stem cell survival and retention, making it a powerful tool to monitor cell fate after transplantation without animal sacrifice. Here we describe a protocol that allows luciferase-labeled stem cells to be imaged and tracked in vivo by bioluminescent imaging via an IVIS spectrum imaging system.

Key words

Bioluminescence Molecular imaging Cell tracking Luciferase 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported in part by research grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 HL133272, R01 HL132875, and R01 HL145676, California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) DR2A-05394 and RT3-07798 (J.C.W.).

References

  1. 1.
    Cao F, Li Z, Lee A, Liu Z, Chen K, Wang H et al (2009) Noninvasive de novo imaging of human embryonic stem cell-derived teratoma formation. Cancer Res 69:2709–2713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao F, Sadrzadeh Rafie AH, Abilez OJ, Wang H, Blundo JT, Pruitt B et al (2007) In vivo imaging and evaluation of different biomatrices for improvement of stem cell survival. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1:465–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Narsinh KH, Cao F, Wu JC (2009) Molecular imaging of human embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol 515:13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nguyen PK, Riegler J, Wu JC (2014) Stem cell imaging: from bench to bedside. Cell Stem Cell 14:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu JC, Sundaresan G, Iyer M, Gambhir SS (2001) Noninvasive optical imaging of firefly luciferase reporter gene expression in skeletal muscles of living mice. Mol Ther 4:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang H, Cao F, De A, Cao Y, Contag C, Gambhir SS et al (2009) Trafficking mesenchymal stem cell engraftment and differentiation in tumor-bearing mice by bioluminescence imaging. Stem Cells 27:1548–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cao F, van der Bogt KE, Sadrzadeh A, Xie X, Sheikh AY, Wang H et al (2007) Spatial and temporal kinetics of teratoma formation from murine embryonic stem cell transplantation. Stem Cells Dev 16:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li Z, Suzuki Y, Huang M, Cao F, Xie X, Connolly AJ et al (2008) Comparison of reporter gene and iron particle labeling for tracking fate of human embryonic stem cells and differentiated endothelial cells in living subjects. Stem Cells 26:864–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swijnenburg RJ, Schrepfer S, Cao F, Pearl JI, Xie X, Connolly AJ et al (2008) In vivo imaging of embryonic stem cells reveals patterns of survival and immune rejection following transplantation. Stem Cells Dev 17:1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gould SJ, Subramani S (1988) Firefly luciferase as a tool in molecular and cell biology. Anal Biochem 175:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford Cardiovascular InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of MedicineStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations