Advertisement

Combination of Dark-Field and Confocal Microscopy for the Optical Detection of Silver and Titanium Nanoparticles in Mammalian Cells

  • Robert Martin ZuckerEmail author
  • William K. Boyes
Protocol
  • 162 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2118)

Abstract

We describe here two optical microscopy techniques—dark-field confocal light scanning microscopy (DF-CLSM) and dark-field wide-field confocal microscopy (DF-WFCM), that can be used to study interaction between nanoparticles and cells in 3D space. Dark field microscopy can detect very small structures below the diffraction limit of conventional light microscopes, while a confocal setup provides vertical sectioning capabilities to render specimens in 3D. The use of DF-WFCM instead of DF-CLSM allows faster sample processing but yields lower resolution. We used a retinal pigment epithelial cell line ARPE-19 to illustrate different optical and lighting conditions necessary for optimal imaging of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (TiO2 and Ag). Our experimental setup primarily involved an E-800 Nikon and Nikon Ni upright microscopes and a Nikon Ti2 microscope connected to a xenon light source along with special dark-field objectives. For confocal studies we used either Leica and Nikon inverted confocal microscopes. For microscopic analyses, ARPE-19 cells were fixed in situ in cultured chamber slides or collected from T-25 flasks and then fixed in suspension. At the lowest concentrations of TiO2 or Ag tested (0.1–0.3 μg/mL), we were able to detect as few as 5–10 nanoparticles per cell due to intense light scattering by the particles. The degree of brightness detected indicated that the uptake of nanoparticles within ARPE-19 cells could be monitored using dark-field microscopy. Here we describe how to use wide-field microscopy to follow nanoparticle uptake by cells and how to assess some aspects of cellular health in in vitro cell cultures exposed to nanoparticles.

Key words

Nanoparticle Microscopy Dark-field Microscopy Toxicology Nanotoxicity Confocal Microscopy Organelles Fluorescence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The manuscript was edited by Enrico Ferrari and Mikhail Soloviev. Appreciation is given to Carl Blackman Eugene Gibbs, James Samet, Laura Degn, Sarah Hutchinson, and Kristen Sanders for their helpful discussions on the research included in the protocol.

Government Disclaimer: The research described in this chapter has been supported by the US Environmental Protection agency. It has been subjected to agency review and does not necessarily reflect the views of the agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred. The mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

References

  1. 1.
    Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero JY et al (2009) Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat Nanotechnol 4:634–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nohynek GJ, Lademann J, Ribaud C (2007) Grey goo on the skin? Nanotechnology, cosmetic and sunscreen safety. Crit Rev Toxicol 37:251–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salzman GC (2001) Light scatter: detection and usage. Curr Protoc Cytom 9:1.13.1–1.13.8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shapiro HM (2003) Practical flow cytometry, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shapiro HM (2001) Optical measurements in cytometry: light scattering, extinction, absorption, and fluorescence. Methods Cell Biol 63:107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zucker RM, Massaro EJ, Sanders KM et al (2010) Detection of TiO2 nanoparticles in cells by flow cytometry. Cytometry 77:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zucker RM, Daniel KM, Massaro E et al (2013) Detection of silver nanoparticles in cells by flow Cytometry using light scatter and far-red fluorescence. Cytometry A 83:962–972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zucker RM, Ortenzio JNR, Boyes WK (2016) Characterization, detection, and counting of metal nanoparticles using flow cytometry. Cytometry A 89:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibbs-Flournoy EA, Bromberg PA et al (2011) Dark field-confocal microscopy detection of Nanoscale particle internalization by human lung cells. Part Fibre Toxicol 8:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zucker RM, Daniel KM (2012) Microscopy imaging methods for the detection of silver and titanium nanoparticles within cells. In: Soloviev M (ed) Methods in molecular biology. Nanoparticles in biology and medicine, vol 906. Springer, Humana Press, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weinkauf H, Brehm-Stecher BF (2009) Enhanced dark field microscopy for rapid artifact-free detection of nanoparticle binding to Candida albicans cells and hyphae. Biotechnol J 4:871–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy DB (2001) NetLibrary I: dark-field microscopy. In: Fundamentals of light microscopy and electronic imaging [electronic resource]. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 112–116Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spencer M (1982) Fundamentals of light microscopy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wayne R (2009) Light and video microscopy. Academic Press/Elsevier, Amsterdam; BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zucker RM (2006) Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance. In: Taatjes DJ, Mossman BT (eds) Methods in molecular biology. Cell imaging techniques, vol 319. Springer, New York, pp 77–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zucker RM (2006) Quality assessment of confocal microscopy slide based systems: performance. Cytometry A 69:659–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zucker RM (2013) Evaluating confocal microscopy system performance. In: Paddock SW (ed) Confocal microscopy methods and protocols, 2nd edn. Humana Press, New York, pp 321–374Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology Branch, Public Health and Integrated Toxicology Division, Center for Public Health and Environmental AssessmentOffice of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  2. 2.Neurological and Endocrine Toxicology Branch, Public Health and Integrated Toxicology Division, Center for Public Health and Environmental AssessmentOffice of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations