Advertisement

RNA Chaperones pp 193-208 | Cite as

In Vivo RNA Chemical Footprinting Analysis in Archaea

  • Robert Knüppel
  • Martin Fenk
  • Michael Jüttner
  • Sébastien Ferreira-CercaEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2106)

Abstract

RNA structural conformation and dynamics govern the functional properties of all RNA/RNP. Accordingly, defining changes of RNA structure and dynamics in various conditions may provide detailed insight into how RNA structural properties regulate the function of RNA/RNP. Traditional chemical footprinting analysis using chemical modifiers allows to sample the dynamics and conformation landscape of diverse RNA/RNP. However, many chemical modifiers are limited in their capacity to provide unbiased information reflecting the in vivo RNA/RNP structural landscape. In the recent years, the development of selective-2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) methodology that uses powerful new chemical modifiers has significantly improved in vitro and in vivo structural probing of secondary and tertiary interactions of diverse RNA species at the single nucleotide level.

Although the original discovery of Archaea as an independent domain of life is intimately linked to the technological development of RNA analysis, our understanding of in vivo RNA structural conformation and dynamics in this domain of life remains scarce.

This protocol describes the in vivo use of SHAPE chemistry in two evolutionary divergent model Archaea, Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and Haloferax volcanii.

Key words

Archaea RNA RNP Chemical footprinting SHAPE NMIA 1m6 1m7 Sulfolobus acidocaldarius Haloferax volcanii 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Tilman Heise (University of Regensburg) for comments and suggestions. We would like to thank our colleagues from the Chair of Biochemistry III and Biochemistry I for sharing materials, equipment, and discussion. Thanks to Prof. Dr. Sonja-Verena Albers (University of Freiburg) and Prof. Dr. Thorsten Allers (University of Nottingham) for sharing strains and protocols. Work in the Ferreira-Cerca laboratory is supported by the Chair of Biochemistry III “House of the Ribosome”-University of Regensburg, by the DFG-funded collaborative research center CRC/SFB960 “RNP Biogenesis: Assembly of Ribosomes and Non-ribosomal RNPs and Control of Their Function” (project AP1/B13), and by an individual DFG grant to S.F.-C. (FE1622/2-1 Project Nr. 409198929).

References

  1. 1.
    Kubota M, Chan D, Spitale RC (2015) RNA structure: merging chemistry and genomics for a holistic perspective. BioEssays 37:1129–1138.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201300146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mauger DM, Weeks KM (2010) Toward global RNA structure analysis. Nat Biotechnol 28:1178–1179.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1110-1178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strobel EJ, Yu AM, Lucks JB (2018) High-throughput determination of RNA structures. Nat Rev Genet 19:615–634.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0034-xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bevilacqua PC, Assmann SM (2018) Technique development for probing RNA structure in vivo and genome-wide. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a032250
  5. 5.
    Hartmann RK, Bindereif A, Schön A, Westhof E (2013) Handbook of RNA biochemistry. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=2008065
  6. 6.
    Hulscher RM, Bohon J, Rappé MC et al (2016) Probing the structure of ribosome assembly intermediates in vivo using DMS and hydroxyl radical footprinting. Adv RNA Struct Determ 103:49–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smola MJ, Calabrese JM, Weeks KM (2015) Detection of RNA-protein interactions in living cells with SHAPE. Biochemistry 54:6867–6875.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spitale RC, Flynn RA, Torre EA et al (2014) RNA structural analysis by evolving SHAPE chemistry. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5:867–881.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felden B (2007) RNA structure: experimental analysis. Curr Opin Microbiol 10:286–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2007.05.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weeks KM (2010) Advances in RNA structure analysis by chemical probing. Nucleic Acids Seq Topol 20:295–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2010.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ohmayer U, Perez-Fernandez J, Hierlmeier T et al (2012) Local tertiary structure probing of ribonucleoprotein particles by nuclease fusion proteins. PLoS One 7:e42449.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mortimer SA, Weeks KM (2008) Time-resolved RNA SHAPE chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 130:16178–16180.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja8061216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smola MJ, Weeks KM (2018) In-cell RNA structure probing with SHAPE-MaP. Nat Protoc 13:1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spitale RC, Crisalli P, Flynn RA et al (2013) RNA SHAPE analysis in living cells. Nat Chem Biol 9:18–20.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Albers S-V, Forterre P, Prangishvili D, Schleper C (2013) The legacy of Carl Woese and Wolfram Zillig: from phylogeny to landmark discoveries. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eme L, Doolittle WF (2015) Archaea. Curr Biol 25:R851–R855.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leigh JA, Albers S-V, Atomi H, Allers T (2011) Model organisms for genetics in the domain Archaea: methanogens, halophiles, Thermococcales and Sulfolobales. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:577–608.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00265.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raddadi N, Cherif A, Daffonchio D et al (2015) Biotechnological applications of extremophiles, extremozymes and extremolytes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:7907–7913.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6874-9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spang A, Caceres EF, Ettema TJG (2017) Genomic exploration of the diversity, ecology, and evolution of the archaeal domain of life. Science 357:eaaf3883.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zeldes BM, Straub CT, Counts JA et al (2018) Biotechnology of extremely thermophilic archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:543–578.  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adam PS, Borrel G, Brochier-Armanet C, Gribaldo S (2017) The growing tree of Archaea: new perspectives on their diversity, evolution and ecology. ISME J 11:2407–2425.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Offre P, Spang A, Schleper C (2013) Archaea in biogeochemical cycles. Annu Rev Microbiol 67:437–457.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jun S-H, Reichlen MJ, Tajiri M, Murakami KS (2011) Archaeal RNA polymerase and transcription regulation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 46:27–40.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2010.538662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lake JA (2015) Eukaryotic origins. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 370.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0321
  25. 25.
    Allers T, Mevarech M (2005) Archaeal genetics—the third way. Nat Rev Genet 6:58–73.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allers T, Ngo H-P, Mevarech M, Lloyd RG (2004) Development of additional selectable markers for the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii based on the leuB and trpA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:943–953.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.2.943-953.2004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wagner M, van Wolferen M, Wagner A et al (2012) Versatile genetic tool box for the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Front Microbiol 3:214.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Knüppel R, Kuttenberger C, Ferreira-Cerca S (2017) Towards time-resolved analysis of RNA metabolism in archaea using 4-thiouracil. Front Microbiol 8:286.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN et al (2002) The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics 3:2–2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-3-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Armache J-P, Anger AM, Márquez V et al (2013) Promiscuous behaviour of archaeal ribosomal proteins: implications for eukaryotic ribosome evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 41:1284–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee B, Flynn RA, Kadina A et al (2017) Comparison of SHAPE reagents for mapping RNA structures inside living cells. RNA 23:169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.058784.116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McGinnis JL, Weeks KM (2014) Ribosome RNA assembly intermediates visualized in living cells. Biochemistry 53:3237–3247.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi500198bCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McGinnis JL, Liu Q, Lavender CA et al (2015) In-cell SHAPE reveals that free 30S ribosome subunits are in the inactive state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:2425–2430.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411514112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burlacu E, Lackmann F, Aguilar L-C et al (2017) High-throughput RNA structure probing reveals critical folding events during early 60S ribosome assembly in yeast. Nat Commun 8:714–714.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00761-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hector RD, Burlacu E, Aitken S et al (2014) Snapshots of pre-rRNA structural flexibility reveal eukaryotic 40S assembly dynamics at nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res 42:12138–12154.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McGinnis JL, Dunkle JA, Cate JHD, Weeks KM (2012) The mechanisms of RNA SHAPE chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 134:6617–6624.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2104075CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mizusawa S, Nishimura S, Seela F (1986) Improvement of the dideoxy chain termination method of DNA sequencing by use of deoxy-7-deazaguanosine triphosphate in place of dGTP. Nucleic Acids Res 14:1319–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Knüppel
    • 1
  • Martin Fenk
    • 1
  • Michael Jüttner
    • 1
  • Sébastien Ferreira-Cerca
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry III, Institute for Biochemistry, Genetics and MicrobiologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations