pp 1-9 | Cite as

Hyperaligning Neural Representational Spaces

  • J. Swaroop Guntupalli
Part of the Neuromethods book series


Neural populations in different brain regions represent different domains of information, but accounting for how population responses in homologous regions in different brains encode the same fine distinctions has been elusive. Common models of cortical functional architectures based on anatomy account for coarse regional topography that encode coarse-scale information such as visual versus auditory stimulation or perception of animate versus inanimate entities but fail to account for fine-scale information that captures distinctions between two songs or two insects. We proposed a method of functional alignment called hyperalignment that aligned high-dimensional neural representational spaces to derive a new common model of cortical functional architecture. This model is based on a common representational space rather than a common cortical topography. By modeling functional topographies as weighted sums of overlapping topographic basis functions, our model also accounts for coarse-scale regional topography and goes further to capture fine-scale topographies that coexist with coarse topographies and carry finer distinctions. In this chapter we present steps for an experimenter to use hyperalignment in their own study to derive a common model representational space and perform analyses in that space.


Hyperalignment Neural decoding MVPA RSA Neuroimaging Functional alignment Representational spaces 


  1. 1.
    Haxby JV, Gobbini MI, Furey ML et al (2001) Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293:2425–2430. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haxby JV, Connolly AC, Guntupalli JS (2014) Decoding neural representational spaces using multivariate pattern analysis. Annu Rev Neurosci 37:435–456. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haxby JV, Guntupalli JS, Connolly AC et al (2011) A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuron 72:404–416. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guntupalli JS, Hanke M, Halchenko YO et al (2016) A model of representational spaces in human cortex. Cereb Cortex 26:2919–2934. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guntupalli JS, Feilong M, Haxby JV (2018) A computational model of shared fine-scale structure in the human connectome. PLoS Comput Biol 14:e1006120. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Bandettini P (2008) Representational similarity analysis—connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci 2.
  7. 7.
    Sabuncu MR, Singer BD, Conroy B et al (2010) Function-based intersubject alignment of human cortical anatomy. Cereb Cortex 20:130–140. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conroy BR, Singer BD, Guntupalli JS et al (2013) Inter-subject alignment of human cortical anatomy using functional connectivity. Neuroimage 81:400–411. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feilong M, Nastase SA, Guntupalli JS, Haxby JV (2018) Reliable individual differences in fine-grained cortical functional architecture. Neuroimage 183:375–386. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taschereau-Dumouchel V, Cortese A, Chiba T et al (2018) Towards an unconscious neural reinforcement intervention for common fears. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:3470–3475. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naselaris T, Kay KN, Nishimoto S, Gallant JL (2011) Encoding and decoding in fMRI. Neuroimage 56:400–410. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29:162–173Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW et al (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23:S208–S219. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RBH, Dale AM (1999) High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 8:272–284Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esteban O, Markiewicz CJ, Blair RW et al (2019) fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat Methods 16:111. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanke M, Halchenko YO, Sederberg PB et al (2009) PyMVPA: a python toolbox for multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data. Neuroinformatics 7:37–53. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC et al (2016) A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 536:171–178. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R, Bandettini P (2006) Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:3863–3868. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen Y, Namburi P, Elliott LT et al (2011) Cortical surface-based searchlight decoding. Neuroimage 56:582–592. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oosterhof NN, Wiestler T, Downing PE, Diedrichsen J (2011) A comparison of volume-based and surface-based multi-voxel pattern analysis. Neuroimage 56:593–600. Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schönemann PH (1966) A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika 31:1–10. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hyperalignment for between-subject analysis. PyMVPA User Manual. Accessed 31 Mar 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Swaroop Guntupalli
    • 1
  1. 1.Vicarious AIUnion CityUSA

Personalised recommendations