Advertisement

pp 1-14 | Cite as

Contextual Cueing

  • Yuhong V. JiangEmail author
  • Caitlin A. Sisk
Protocol
Part of the Neuromethods book series

Abstract

Contextual cueing refers to the facilitation of visual search by the occasional repetition of a visual context. In standard spatial contextual cueing, a visual search target appears in a consistent location within a repeated array of objects. Search time is faster on repeated displays relative to novel displays, even in participants who do not explicitly recognize the repeated displays. Contextual cueing exemplifies the importance of statistical learning and the resulting memory in guiding attention. Because it involves implicit, relational learning, it has been instrumental in understanding brain functions, cognitive changes across the life span, as well as effects of various neurological, neurodevelopmental, and psychiatric conditions. To stimulate further behavioral and brain research on memory-guided attention and to facilitate comparisons across studies, here we provide a methodological guide on the experimental paradigm of contextual cueing and review key findings. We identify factors that influence the strength of the effect and underscore potential pitfalls in experimental design, data analysis, and interpretation.

Keywords

Contextual cueing Visual attention Statistical learning Visual search Implicit learning Spatial cognition Medial temporal lobe Striatum 

References

  1. 1.
    Chun MM, Jiang Y (1998) Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn Psychol 36:28–71.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Awh E, Belopolsky AV, Theeuwes J (2012) Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci 16:437–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brockmole JR, Henderson JM (2006) Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 59:1177–1187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600665996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chun MM, Jiang Y (2003) Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:224–234Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colagiuri B, Livesey EJ (2016) Contextual cuing as a form of nonconscious learning: theoretical and empirical analysis in large and very large samples. Psychon Bull Rev 23:1996–2009.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1063-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vadillo MA, Konstantinidis E, Shanks DR (2016) Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning. Psychon Bull Rev 23:87–102.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0892-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park H, Quinlan J, Thornton E, Reder LM (2004) The effect of midazolam on visual search: implications for understanding amnesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:17879–17883.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408075101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chun MM, Phelps EA (1999) Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nat Neurosci 2:844–847.  https://doi.org/10.1038/12222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manns JR, Squire LR (2001) Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus. Hippocampus 11:776–782.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Asselen M, Almeida I, Andre R et al (2009) The role of the basal ganglia in implicit contextual learning: a study of Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 47:1269–1273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Asselen M, Almeida I, Júlio F et al (2012) Implicit contextual learning in prodromal and early stage Huntington’s disease patients. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 18:689–696.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617712000288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geringswald F, Herbik A, Hoffmann MB, Pollmann S (2013) Contextual cueing impairment in patients with age-related macular degeneration. J Vis 13.  https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.28Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greene AJ, Gross WL, Elsinger CL, Rao SM (2007) Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task. Learn Mem 14:548–553.  https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.609807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Preston AR, Gabrieli JDE (2008) Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Cereb Cortex 18:2192–2207.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manginelli AA, Baumgartner F, Pollmann S (2013) Dorsal and ventral working memory-related brain areas support distinct processes in contextual cueing. Neuroimage 67:363–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kunar MA, Flusberg S, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM (2007) Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:816–828.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaumon M, Drouet V, Tallon-Baudry C (2008) Unconscious associative memory affects visual processing before 100 ms. J Vis 8:10.1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1167/8.3.10Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson JS, Woodman GF, Braun E, Luck SJ (2007) Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex. Psychon Bull Rev 14:834–839Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olson IR, Chun MM, Allison T (2001) Contextual guidance of attention: human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. Brain 124:1417–1425Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schankin A, Schubö A (2009) Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 46:668–679Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schankin A, Schubö A (2010) Contextual cueing effects despite spatially cued target locations. Psychophysiology 47:717–727.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00979.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harris AM, Remington RW (2017) Contextual cueing improves attentional guidance, even when guidance is supposedly optimal. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 43:926–940.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peterson MS, Kramer AF (2001) Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Percept Psychophys 63:1239–1249Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao G, Liu Q, Jiao J et al (2012) Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: evidence from eye movement recordings. J Vis 12:11.  https://doi.org/10.1167/12.6.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schankin A, Hagemann D, Schubö A (2011) Is contextual cueing more than the guidance of visual-spatial attention? Biol Psychol 87:58–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Couperus JW, Hunt RH, Nelson CA, Thomas KM (2011) Visual search and contextual cueing: differential effects in 10-year-old children and adults. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:334–348.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0021-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brady TF, Chun MM (2007) Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:798–815.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goujon A, Didierjean A, Thorpe S (2015) Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 19:524–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weigard A, Huang-Pollock C (2014) A diffusion modeling approach to understanding contextual cueing effects in children with ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 55:1336–1344.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kunar MA, Flusberg SJ, Wolfe JM (2006) Contextual cuing by global features. Percept Psychophys 68:1204–1216Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wolfe JM (1998) What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychol Sci 9:33–39Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rausei V, Makovski T, Jiang YV (2007) Attention dependency in implicit learning of repeated search context. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 60:1321–1328.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701515744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Conci M, von Mühlenen A (2009) Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:1514–1524.  https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.7.1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jungé JA, Scholl BJ, Chun MM (2007) How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing. Vis Cogn 15:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280600859706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lleras A, Von Mühlenen A (2004) Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spat Vis 17:465–482Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Faust ME, Balota DA, Spieler DH, Ferraro FR (1999) Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. Psychol Bull 125:777–799Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jiang Y, Song J-H, Rigas A (2005) High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychon Bull Rev 12:524–529Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Carrasco M, Evert DL, Chang I, Katz SM (1995) The eccentricity effect: target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Percept Psychophys 57:1241–1261Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    van Asselen M, Castelo-Branco M (2009) The role of peripheral vision in implicit contextual cuing. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:76–81.  https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Conci M, Sun L, Müller HJ (2011) Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes. Psychol Res 75:279–289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0306-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smyth AC, Shanks DR (2008) Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Mem Cognit 36:403–415Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reber AS, Walkenfeld FF, Hernstadt R (1991) Implicit and explicit learning: individual differences and IQ. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 17:888–896Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Olson IR, Chun MM (2002) Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Vis Cognit 9:273–302.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kunar MA, Wolfe JM (2011) Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:2077–2091.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0164-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Beesley T, Vadillo MA, Pearson D, Shanks DR (2015) Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 41:348–362.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yang Y, Merrill EC (2015) The impact of signal-to-noise ratio on contextual cueing in children and adults. J Exp Child Psychol 132:65–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Annac E, Manginelli AA, Pollmann S et al (2013) Memory under pressure: secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search. J Vis 13:6.  https://doi.org/10.1167/13.13.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jiang Y, Leung AW (2005) Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychon Bull Rev 12:100–106.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jiang Y, Song J-H (2005) Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:1439–1448.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Makovski T (2016) What is the context of contextual cueing? Psychon Bull Rev 23:1982–1988.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1058-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Summerfield JJ, Lepsien J, Gitelman DR et al (2006) Orienting attention based on long-term memory experience. Neuron 49:905–916.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations