Advertisement

In Vitro Maintenance of Multipotent Neural Crest Stem Cells as Crestospheres

  • Sofie Mohlin
  • Laura KerosuoEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2002)

Abstract

Neural crest cells are a critical source of many cell types of the vertebrate body. However, as a stem cell population they are peculiar because of the transient nature of their stem cell niche; soon after the multipotent neural crest cells are specified in the neuroepithelium, they become mesenchymal cells that migrate into various destinations in early embryos. These rapid in vivo changes during neural crest development complicate the studies on their stem cell properties. Crestospheres are in vitro maintained primary cultures of premigratory neural crest cells that maintain a mixture of neural crest stem and progenitor cells for weeks without spontaneous differentiation, including the multipotent neural crest stem cells. Here, we describe how crestosphere cultures are initiated from either cranial or trunk levels of chick embryos. Alternatively, the same culture conditions can be used to maintain human embryonic stem cell-derived neural crest cells as crestospheres. Thus, crestospheres provide a useful tool for studies on neural crest stemness.

Keywords

Chick embryo Cranial neural crest Crestospheres Human ES cell-derived neural crest Multipotency Neural crest Self-renewal Trunk neural crest 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation, Thelma Zoéga’s Foundation, Hans von Kantzow’s Foundation, the Mary Béve Foundation, the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund, Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse (to S.M.) and the Academy of Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth’s Foundation (to L.K.), and in part by the Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research at the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

References

  1. 1.
    Simoes-Costa M, Bronner ME (2016) Reprogramming of avian neural crest axial identity and cell fate. Science 352(6293):1570–1573.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2729 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dupin E, Calloni GW, Coelho-Aguiar JM, Le Douarin NM (2018) The issue of the multipotency of the neural crest cells. Dev Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kerosuo L, Nie S, Bajpai R, Bronner ME (2015) Crestospheres: long-term maintenance of multipotent, premigratory neural crest stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 5(4):499–507.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.08.017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen AM, Konigsberg IR (1975) A clonal approach to the problem of neural crest determination. Dev Biol 46(2):262–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sieber-Blum M, Cohen AM (1980) Clonal analysis of quail neural crest cells: they are pluripotent and differentiate in vitro in the absence of noncrest cells. Dev Biol 80(1):96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lahav R, Ziller C, Dupin E, Le Douarin NM (1996) Endothelin 3 promotes neural crest cell proliferation and mediates a vast increase in melanocyte number in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(9):3892–3897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trentin A, Glavieux Pardanaud C, Le Douarin N, Dupin E (2004) Self-renewal capacity is a widespread property of various types of neural crest precursor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(13):4495–4500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerosuo L, Bronner ME (2016) cMyc regulates the size of the premigratory neural crest stem cell pool. Cell Rep 17(10):2648–2659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.025 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohlin S, Kunttas E, Persson CU, Abdel-Haq R, Castillo A, Murko C, Bronner ME, Kerusou L (2018) Maintaining trunk neural crest cells as crestospheres. bioRxiv.  https://doi.org/10.1101/391599
  10. 10.
    Reynolds BA, Weiss S (1992) Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255(5052):1707–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bajpai R, Chen D, Rada Iglesias A, Zhang J, Xiong Y, Helms J, Chang C-P, Zhao Y, Swigut T, Wysocka J (2010) CHD7 cooperates with PBAF to control multipotent neural crest formation. Nature 463(7283):958–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martinez-Morales P, Diez Del Corral R, Olivera-Martnez I, Quiroga A, Das R, Barbas J, Storey K, Morales A (2011) FGF and retinoic acid activity gradients control the timing of neural crest cell emigration in the trunk. J Cell Biol 194(3):489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kerosuo L, Bronner M (2014) Biphasic influence of Miz1 on neural crest development by regulating cell survival and apical adhesion complex formation in the developing neural tube. Mol Biol Cell 25(3):347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Acloque H, Wilkinson DG, Nieto MA (2008) Chapter 9 in situ hybridization analysis of chick embryos in whole-mount and tissue sections. In: Marianne B-F (ed) Methods in cell biology, vol 87. Academic, New York, pp 169–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00209-4 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of Health and Human ServicesNeural Crest Development and Disease Unit, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations