Advertisement

Isolation of Normal Fibroblasts and Their Cancer-Associated Counterparts (CAFs) for Biomedical Research

  • BarboraBarbora Dvořánková
  • Lukáš LacinaEmail author
  • Karel SmetanaJr.
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1879)

Abstract

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) represent a crucial component of cancer microenvironment. CAFs significantly influence biological properties of various types of cancer in terms of local aggressiveness, recurrence, and metastatic behaviour. This chapter summarizes a simple protocol for isolation of normal fibroblasts and their cancer-associated counterparts from normal human skin and mucosa, respectively, as well as from samples of human tumours such as basal/squamous carcinoma, melanoma, and breast cancer, and employment of this procedure for other types of cancer is possible. Isolated fibroblasts can be expanded in vitro and employed for further analysis of, e.g., DNA, RNA, protein, etc.

Keywords

Cancer microenvironment Cancer-associated fibroblast Cell cultivation Fibroblast Fibroblast isolation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grant no. 16-05534S); Charles University (project of PROGRES Q28/F1); Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of CR within the National Sustainability Program II (project BIOCEV-FAR; registration no. LQ1604); and project BIOCEV (grant no. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109). The present study is a result of the following project implementation: the equipment for metabolomic and cell analyses (grant no. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/19.0400) supported by the Research and Development for Innovations Operational Program, co-financed by the European regional development fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic.

References

  1. 1.
    Marks PW, Witten CM, Califf RM (2017) Clarifying stem-cell therapy’s benefits and risks. N Engl J Med 376:1007–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caplan AI (2017) Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Time to Change the Name! Stem Cells Transl Med 6:1445–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bardelli S, Moccetti M (2017) Remodeling the human adult stem cell niche for regenerative medicine applications. Stem Cells Int 2017:6406025PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madl CM, Heilshorn SC (2017) Engineering hydrogel microenvironments to recapitulate the stem cell niche. Annu Rev Biomed Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szade KT, Gulati GS, Chan CKF et al (2017) Where hematopoietic stem cells live—the bone marrow niche. Antioxid Redox Signal.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Machida K (2017) Pluripotency transcription factors and metabolic reprogramming of mitochondria in tumor-initiating stem-like cells. Antioxid Redox Signal.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Motlík J, Klíma J, Dvoránková B, Smetana K Jr (2007) Porcine epidermal stem cells as a biomedical model for wound healing and normal/malignant epithelial cell propagation. Theriogenology 67:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kareva I (2011) What can ecology teach us about cancer? Transl Oncol 4:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kareva I (2013) Biological stoichiometry in tumor micro-environments. PLoS One 8:e51844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lacina L, Plzak J, Kodet O et al (2015) Cancer microenvironment: what can we learn from the stem cell niche. Int J Mol Sci 16:24094–24110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gál P, Varinská L, Fáber L et al (2017) How signaling molecules regulate tumor microenvironment: parallels to wound repair. Molecules 22:E1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bai X (ed) (2013) Dermal fibroblasts: histological perspectives, characterization and role in disease. Nova Sciences, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Živicová V, Lacina L, Mateu R et al (2017) Analysis of dermal fibroblasts isolated from neonatal and child cleft lip and adult skin: developmental implications on reconstructive surgery. Int J Mol Med 40:1323–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valach J, Fík Z, Strnad H et al (2012) Smooth muscle actin-expressing stromal fibroblasts in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: increased expression of galectin-1 and induction of poor prognosis factors. Int J Cancer 131:2499–2508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trylcova J, Busek P, Smetana K Jr et al (2015) Effect of cancer-associated fibroblasts on the migration of glioma cells in vitro. Tumour Biol 36: 5873–5879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jobe NP, Rösel D, Dvořánková B et al (2016) Simultaneous blocking of IL-6 and IL-8 is sufficient to fully inhibit CAF-induced human melanoma cell invasiveness. Histochem Cell Biol 146:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lacina L, Kodet O, Dvořánková B, Szabo P, Smetana K Jr (2018) Ecology of melanoma cell. Histol Histopathol 33:247–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dvořánková B, Smetana K Jr, Říhová B, Kučera J, Mate R, Szabo P (2015) Cancer-associated fibroblasts are not formed from cancer cells by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in nu/nu mice. Histochem Cell Biol 143: 463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smetana K Jr, Lacina L, Szabo P, Dvořánková B, Brož P, Šedo A (2016) Ageing as an important risk factor for cancer. Anticancer Res 36:5009–5017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • BarboraBarbora Dvořánková
    • 1
  • Lukáš Lacina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karel SmetanaJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy and BIOCEV, Charles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations