Abstract
Mouse genetic approaches when combined with live imaging tools are revolutionizing our current understanding of mammalian developmental biology. The availability and improvement of a wide variety of genetically encoded fluorescent proteins have provided indispensable tools to visualize cells and subcellular features in living organisms. It is now possible to generate genetically modified mouse lines expressing several spectrally distinct fluorescent proteins in a tissue-specific or -inducible manner. Such reporter-expressing lines make it possible to image dynamic cellular behaviors in the context of living embryos undergoing normal or aberrant development. As with all viviparous mammals, mouse embryos develop within the uterus, and so live imaging experiments require culture conditions that closely mimic the in vivo environment. Over the past decades, significant advances have been made in developing conditions for culturing both pre- and postimplantation-stage mouse embryos. In this chapter, we discuss routine methods for ex utero culture of preimplantation- and postimplantation-stage mouse embryos. In particular, we describe protocols for collecting mouse embryos of various stages, setting up culture conditions for their ex utero culture and imaging, and using laser scanning confocal microscopy to visualize live processes in mouse embryos expressing fluorescent reporters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Keller PJ, Schmidt AD, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer EH (2008) Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Science 322(5904):1065–1069. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162493
Megason SG, Fraser SE (2003) Digitizing life at the level of the cell: high-performance laser-scanning microscopy and image analysis for in toto imaging of development. Mech Dev 120(11):1407–1420
Hadjantonakis AK, Dickinson ME, Fraser SE, Papaioannou VE (2003) Technicolour transgenics: imaging tools for functional genomics in the mouse. Nat Rev Genet 4(8):613–625. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1126
Nowotschin S, Eakin GS, Hadjantonakis AK (2009) Live-imaging fluorescent proteins in mouse embryos: multi-dimensional, multi-spectral perspectives. Trends Biotechnol 27(5):266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.02.006
Dickinson ME (2006) Multimodal imaging of mouse development: tools for the postgenomic era. Dev Dyn 235(9):2386–2400. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20889
Viotti M, Nowotschin S, Hadjantonakis AK (2014) SOX17 links gut endoderm morphogenesis and germ layer segregation. Nat Cell Biol 16(12):1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3070
Hadjantonakis AK, Papaioannou VE (2004) Dynamic in vivo imaging and cell tracking using a histone fluorescent protein fusion in mice. BMC Biotechnol 4:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-33
Fraser ST, Hadjantonakis AK, Sahr KE, Willey S, Kelly OG, Jones EA et al (2005) Using a histone yellow fluorescent protein fusion for tagging and tracking endothelial cells in ES cells and mice. Genesis 42(3):162–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/gene.20139
Plusa B, Hadjantonakis AK, Gray D, Piotrowska-Nitsche K, Jedrusik A, Papaioannou VE et al (2005) The first cleavage of the mouse zygote predicts the blastocyst axis. Nature 434(7031):391–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03388
Plusa B, Piliszek A, Frankenberg S, Artus J, Hadjantonakis AK (2008) Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 135(18):3081–3091. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.021519
Xenopoulos P, Kang M, Puliafito A, Di Talia S, Hadjantonakis AK (2015) Heterogeneities in nanog expression drive stable commitment to pluripotency in the mouse blastocyst. Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.010
Rhee JM, Pirity MK, Lackan CS, Long JZ, Kondoh G, Takeda J et al (2006) In vivo imaging and differential localization of lipid-modified GFP-variant fusions in embryonic stem cells and mice. Genesis 44(4):202–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20203
Chi X, Hadjantonakis AK, Wu Z, Hyink D, Costantini F (2009) A transgenic mouse that reveals cell shape and arrangement during ureteric bud branching. Genesis 47(2):61–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20452
Larina IV, Shen W, Kelly OG, Hadjantonakis AK, Baron MH, Dickinson ME (2009) A membrane associated mCherry fluorescent reporter line for studying vascular remodeling and cardiac function during murine embryonic development. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 292(3):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20821
Campbell RE, Tour O, Palmer AE, Steinbach PA, Baird GS, Zacharias DA et al (2002) A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(12):7877–7882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082243699
Hadjantonakis AK, Macmaster S, Nagy A (2002) Embryonic stem cells and mice expressing different GFP variants for multiple non-invasive reporter usage within a single animal. BMC Biotechnol 2:11
Long JZ, Lackan CS, Hadjantonakis AK (2005) Genetic and spectrally distinct in vivo imaging: embryonic stem cells and mice with widespread expression of a monomeric red fluorescent protein. BMC Biotechnol 5:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-5-20
Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, Tsien RY (2004) Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 22(12):1567–1572. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1037
Nowotschin S, Eakin GS, Hadjantonakis AK (2009) Dual transgene strategy for live visualization of chromatin and plasma membrane dynamics in murine embryonic stem cells and embryonic tissues. Genesis 47(5):330–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20500
Trichas G, Begbie J, Srinivas S (2008) Use of the viral 2A peptide for bicistronic expression in transgenic mice. BMC Biol 6:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-40
Jones EA, Baron MH, Fraser SE, Dickinson ME (2004) Measuring hemodynamic changes during mammalian development. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287(4):H1561–H1569. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00081.2004
Kwon GS, Hadjantonakis AK (2007) Eomes::GFP-a tool for live imaging cells of the trophoblast, primitive streak, and telencephalon in the mouse embryo. Genesis 45(4):208–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20293
Srinivas S, Goldberg MR, Watanabe T, D’Agati V, al-Awqati Q, Costantini F (1999) Expression of green fluorescent protein in the ureteric bud of transgenic mice: a new tool for the analysis of ureteric bud morphogenesis. Dev Genet 24(3–4):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)24:3/4<241::AID-DVG7>3.0.CO;2-R
Kwon GS, Hadjantonakis AK (2009) Transthyretin mouse transgenes direct RFP expression or Cre-mediated recombination throughout the visceral endoderm. Genesis 47(7):447–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20522
Freyer L, Schroter C, Saiz N, Schrode N, Nowotschin S, Martinez-Arias A et al (2015) A loss-of-function and H2B-Venus transcriptional reporter allele for Gata6 in mice. BMC Dev Biol 15:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-015-0086-5
Wu T, Hadjantonakis AK, Nowotschin S (2017) Visualizing endoderm cell populations and their dynamics in the mouse embryo with a Hex-tdTomato reporter. Biol Open 6(5):678–687. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.024638
Nowotschin S, Xenopoulos P, Schrode N, Hadjantonakis AK (2013) A bright single-cell resolution live imaging reporter of Notch signaling in the mouse. BMC Dev Biol 13:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-13-15
Meilhac SM, Adams RJ, Morris SA, Danckaert A, Le Garrec JF, Zernicka-Goetz M (2009) Active cell movements coupled to positional induction are involved in lineage segregation in the mouse blastocyst. Dev Biol 331(2):210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.036
Perea-Gomez A, Meilhac SM, Piotrowska-Nitsche K, Gray D, Collignon J, Zernicka-Goetz M (2007) Regionalization of the mouse visceral endoderm as the blastocyst transforms into the egg cylinder. BMC Dev Biol 7:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-96
Nowotschin S, Hadjantonakis AK (2009) Use of KikGR a photoconvertible green-to-red fluorescent protein for cell labeling and lineage analysis in ES cells and mouse embryos. BMC Dev Biol 9(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-9-49
Abe T, Fujimori T (2013) Reporter mouse lines for fluorescence imaging. Develop Growth Differ 55(4):390–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/dgd.12062
Sutherland AE, Speed TP, Calarco PG (1990) Inner cell allocation in the mouse morula: the role of oriented division during fourth cleavage. Dev Biol 137(1):13–25
Lehtonen E (1980) Changes in cell dimensions and intercellular contacts during cleavage-stage cell cycles in mouse embryonic cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 58:231–249
Flint OP, Ede DA (1982) Cell interactions in the developing somite: in vitro comparisons between amputated (am/am) and normal mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 67:113–125
Dickinson ME, Simbuerger E, Zimmermann B, Waters CW, Fraser SE (2003) Multiphoton excitation spectra in biological samples. J Biomed Opt 8(3):329–338. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1583734
Huisken J, Swoger J, Del Bene F, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer EH (2004) Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305(5686):1007–1009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100035
Weber M, Huisken J (2011) Light sheet microscopy for real-time developmental biology. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21(5):566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.009
Stegmaier J, Amat F, Lemon WC, McDole K, Wan Y, Teodoro G et al (2016) Real-time three-dimensional cell segmentation in large-scale microscopy data of developing embryos. Dev Cell 36(2):225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.028
Amat F, Hockendorf B, Wan Y, Lemon WC, McDole K, Keller PJ (2015) Efficient processing and analysis of large-scale light-sheet microscopy data. Nat Protoc 10(11):1679–1696. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.111
Udan RS, Piazza VG, Hsu CW, Hadjantonakis AK, Dickinson ME (2014) Quantitative imaging of cell dynamics in mouse embryos using light-sheet microscopy. Development 141(22):4406–4414. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.111021
Ichikawa T, Nakazato K, Keller PJ, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Stelzer EH, Mochizuki A et al (2013) Live imaging of whole mouse embryos during gastrulation: migration analyses of epiblast and mesodermal cells. PLoS One 8(7):e64506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064506
Ichikawa T, Nakazato K, Keller PJ, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Stelzer EH, Mochizuki A et al (2014) Live imaging and quantitative analysis of gastrulation in mouse embryos using light-sheet microscopy and 3D tracking tools. Nat Protoc 9(3):575–585. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.035
Lou X, Kang M, Xenopoulos P, Munoz-Descalzo S, Hadjantonakis AK (2014) A rapid and efficient 2D/3D nuclear segmentation method for analysis of early mouse embryo and stem cell image data. Stem Cell Reports 2(3):382–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.01.010
Saiz N, Kang M, Schrode N, Lou X, Hadjantonakis AK (2016) Quantitative analysis of protein expression to study lineage specification in mouse preimplantation embryos. J Vis Exp (108):53654. https://doi.org/10.3791/53654
Kang M, Garg V, Hadjantonakis AK (2017) Lineage establishment and progression within the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst requires FGFR1 and FGFR2. Dev Cell 41(5):496–510.e495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.003
Schrode N, Saiz N, Di Talia S, Hadjantonakis AK (2014) GATA6 levels modulate primitive endoderm cell fate choice and timing in the mouse blastocyst. Dev Cell 29(4):454–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.011
Copp AJ, Cockroft DL (1990) Postimplantation mammalian embryos. A practical approach. IRL, Oxford
Downs KM, Davies T (1993) Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 118(4):1255–1266
Theiler K (1989) The house mouse. Atlas of embryonic development. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, Behringer R (2003) Manipulating the mouse embryo, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor
Jones EA, Crotty D, Kulesa PM, Waters CW, Baron MH, Fraser SE et al (2002) Dynamic in vivo imaging of postimplantation mammalian embryos using whole embryo culture. Genesis 34(4):228–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/gene.10162
Yamanaka Y, Tamplin OJ, Beckers A, Gossler A, Rossant J (2007) Live imaging and genetic analysis of mouse notochord formation reveals regional morphogenetic mechanisms. Dev Cell 13(6):884–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.10.016
Moore-Scott BA, Gordon J, Blackburn CC, Condie BG, Manley NR (2003) New serum-free in vitro culture technique for midgestation mouse embryos. Genesis 35(3):164–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/gene.10179
Keller-Peck CR, Walsh MK, Gan WB, Feng G, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW (2001) Asynchronous synapse elimination in neonatal motor units: studies using GFP transgenic mice. Neuron 31(3):381–394
Cahalan MD, Parker I, Wei SH, Miller MJ (2003) Real-time imaging of lymphocytes in vivo. Curr Opin Immunol 15(4):372–377
Theer P, Hasan MT, Denk W (2003) Two-photon imaging to a depth of 1000 microm in living brains by use of a Ti:Al2O3 regenerative amplifier. Opt Lett 28(12):1022–1024
Puri S, Hebrok M (2007) Dynamics of embryonic pancreas development using real-time imaging. Dev Biol 306(1):82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.003
Acknowledgments
We thank our present and past laboratory colleagues for helping perfect the techniques detailed in this chapter. Work in our laboratory is supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01DK084391, R01HD094868, and P30CA008748) and The Starr Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Nowotschin, S., Garg, V., Piliszek, A., Hadjantonakis, AK. (2019). Ex Utero Culture and Imaging of Mouse Embryos. In: Pelegri, F. (eds) Vertebrate Embryogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1920. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9009-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9009-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9008-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9009-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols