Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preparation of Qualitative Research

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

  • 889 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we present a brief discussion about qualitative research, an approach widely used in social sciences to understand the phenomena that involve humans. Due to the importance given to the subjective perspective of the researcher and the participants being studied, this approach proved to be an important tool to understand the social relations of the most varied human groups. First, a brief history of qualitative research and its main features are presented. Then, we show the steps that the researcher must follow before starting his research. Finally, we have outlined some of the main methods used in qualitative research—ethnography, phenomenology, action research, grounded theory and case study—with some practical examples of how they can be used in ethnobiological studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, “practitioners” are the actors involved in performing any research, teaching, or extension practice.

References

  1. Flick U (2014) An introduction to qualitative research, 5th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, p 616

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly K (2016) A different type of lighting research: a qualitative methodology. Light Res Technol 49(8):933–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paley J (2014) Heidegger, lived experience and method. J Adv Nurs 70(7):1520–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leppink J (2017) Revisiting the quantitative—qualitative-mixed methods labels: research questions, developments, and the need for replication. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 12(2):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammersley M (2014) On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qual Res 14(5):529–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hannigan GG (1997) Action research: methods that make sense. Med Ref Serv Quar 16(1):53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bath C (2009) When does the action start and finish? Making the case for an ethnographic action research in educational research. J Educ Action Res 17(2):213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laudonia I, Mamlok-Naaman R, Abels S, Eilks I (2017) Action research in science education – an analytical review of the literature. J Edu Action Res 26:480–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1358198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson V (2013) Research methods: action research. Evid Based Libr Info Pract 8(4):160–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Engel GI (2000) Pesquisa-ação. Educ Rev 16(16):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tripp D (2005) Pesquisa-ação: uma introdução metodológica. Educ Pesq 31(3):443–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oliveira RD, Oliveira MD (1990) Pesquisa social e ação educativa: conhecer a realidade para poder transformá-la. In: Brandão CR (ed) Pesquisa participante. Editora Brasiliense, São Paulo, pp 17–33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beal XV (2011) ¿Cómohacer investigación cualitativa? Una guía prática para saber qué es la investigación en general y cómo hacerla, con énfasis en las etapas de la investigación cualitativa. ETXETA, Jalisco, p 138

    Google Scholar 

  14. Almagor E, Skinner J (2013) Ancient ethnography: new approaches, 1st edn. Bloomsbury Publishing Pic, London, p 296

    Google Scholar 

  15. Creswell JW (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, p 273

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones JS (2010) Origins and ancestors: a brief history of ethnography. In: Jones JS, Watt S (eds) Ethnography in social science practice. Routledge, London, pp 13–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Humphreys M, Watson T (2009) Ethnographic practices: from ‘writing-up ethnographic research’ to ‘writing ethnography’. In: Ybema S, Yanow D, Wels H, Kamsteeg F (eds) Organizational ethnography: studying the complexity of everyday life. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, pp 40–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Waal K (2009) Getting going: organizing ethnographic fieldwork. In: Ybema S, Yanow D, Wels H, Kamsteeg F (eds) Organizational ethnography: studying the complexity of everyday life. SAGE, Los Angeles, pp 23–39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):338–360

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bass AE, Milosevic I (2018) The ethnographic method in CSR research: the role and importance of methodological fit. Business Soc 57(1):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Whitehead TL (2004) What is ethnography? Methodological, ontological, and epistemological attributes, 1st edn. CEHC, New York, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adams KM (2012) Ethnographic methods. In: Dwyer L, Gill A, Seertaram N (eds) Handbook of research methods in tourism: qualitative and quantitative methods. Edward Elgar/Ashgate, Northampton, MA, pp 339–351

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R (2010) Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados, 1st edn. Paidós, Barcelona, p 239

    Google Scholar 

  24. Silva CC, Medina P, Pinto IM (2012) A fenomenologia e suas contribuições para a pesquisa em educação. InterMeio 18(36):50–63

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dowling M (2007) From Husserl to van Manen: a review of different phenomenological approaches. Int J Nurs Stud 44(1):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anthea WA (2015) Guide to phenomenological resource. Nurs Stand 29(34):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions, 2nd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, p 448

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shi Z (2011) Dilemmas in using phenomenology to investigate elementary school children learning english as a second language. In Educ 17(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mayoh J, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2015) Toward a conceptualization of mixed methods phenomenological research. J Mix Methods Res 9(1):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Anggerainy SW, Wanda D, Hayati H (2017) Combining natural ingredients and beliefs: the Dayak Tribe’s experience caring for sick children with traditional medicine. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs 40(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W (2008) Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 337(567):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  32. Markey K, Tilki M, Taylor G (2014) Reflecting on the challenges of choosing and using a grounded theory approach. Nurs Res 22(2):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Urquhart C, Lehmann H, Myers MD (2010) Putting the “theory” back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Info Syst J 20(4):357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kenny M, Fourie R (2014) Tracing the history of grounded theory methodology: from formation to fragmentation. The Qual Rep 19(52):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  35. D’Avigdor E, Wohlmuth H, Asfaw Z, Awas T (2014) The current status of knowledge of herbal medicine and medicinal plants in Fiche, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 10(38):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  36. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis, 1st edn. Sage Publications Ltd, London, p 224

    Google Scholar 

  37. Seidel S, Recker J (2009) Using grounded theory for studying business process management phenomena. 17th European conference on information system 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  38. Charmaz K (2008) Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (eds) Handbook of emergent methods. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 155–170

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meyer CB (2001) A case in case study methodology. Field Methods 13(4):329–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zainal Z (2007) Case study as a research method. J Kemanusiaan 5(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  41. Baxter P, Jack S (2008) Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep 13(4):544–559

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hancock DR, Algozzine B (2006) Doing case study research: a practical guide for beginning researchers, 1st edn. Teachers College Press, New York, p 121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Etnobiologia e Conservação da Natureza, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Joelson Moreno Brito Moura, Risoneide Henriques da Silva, Nylber Augusto da Silva & Daniel Carvalho Pires de Sousa

  2. Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas Socioecológicos, Departamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

Authors
  1. Joelson Moreno Brito Moura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Risoneide Henriques da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nylber Augusto da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Carvalho Pires de Sousa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

    Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

  2. Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil

    Reinaldo Farias Paiva de Lucena

  3. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

    Luiz Vital Fernandes Cruz da Cunha

  4. Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil

    Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Moura, J.M.B., da Silva, R.H., da Silva, N.A., de Sousa, D.C.P., Albuquerque, U.P. (2019). Preparation of Qualitative Research. In: Albuquerque, U., de Lucena, R., Cruz da Cunha, L., Alves, R. (eds) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology . Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8918-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8919-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation