Abstract
Common bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. has been shown to be a recalcitrant plant to induce somatic embryogenesis (SE) under in vitro conditions. An alternative strategy to yield SE is based upon the use of a cytokinin (benzyladenine) coupled with osmotic stress adaptation instead of the auxin-inducing SE in common bean. Here we described the induction of proembryogenic masses (PEM) derived from the apical meristem and cotyledonary zone of zygotic embryos, from which secondary SE indirect embryogenesis emerged. Maturation of SE was achieved by using osmotic stress medium and converted to plants. Long-term recurrent SE was demonstrated by propagation of PEM at early stages of SE. This protocol is currently being applied for stable genetic transformation by means of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and biobalistics as well as basic biochemical and molecular biology research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1999) PHASEOLUS BEAN: Post-harvest Operations. Organisation: Centro Internacional de Agricultura tropical (CIAT) www.cgiar.org/ciat. Author: AL. Jones. Edited by AGSI/FAO: Danilo Mejia (Technical), Beverly Lewis (Language and style)
Veltcheva M, Svetleva D, Petkova SP, Perl A (2005) In vitro regeneration and genetic transformation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)-problems and progress. Sci Hort 107:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.07.005
Delgado-Sánchez P, Saucedo-Ruiz M, Guzmán-Maldonado SH et al (2006) An organogenic plant regeneration system for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Sci 170:822–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.11.015
Arellano J, Fuentes SI, Castillo-España P, Hernández G (2009) Regeneration of different cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) via indirect organogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org 96:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9454-1
Gatica-Arias AM, Muñoz-Valverde J, Ramírez-Fonseca P, Valdez-Melara M (2010) In vitro plant regeneration system for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): effect of N6-benzylaminopurine and adenine sulphate. Electron J Biotechnol 13:a06. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-34582010000100006
Kwapata K, Sabzikar R, Stcklen MB, Kelly JD (2010) In vitro regeneration and morphogenesis studies in common bean. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 100:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9624-9
Collado R, Veitía N, Bermúdez-Caraballoso I et al (2013) Efficient in vitro plant regeneration via indirect organogenesis for different common bean cultivars. Sci Hort 153:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.02.007
Russell DR, Wallace KM, Bathe JH et al (1993) Stable transformation of Phaseolus vulgaris via electric-discharge mediated particle acceleration. Plant Cell Rep 12:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239099
Aragao FJL, Barros LMG, Brasileiro ACM et al (1996) Inheritance of foreign genes in transgenic bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) co-transformed via particle bombardment. Theor Appl Genet 93:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225739
Aragao FJL, Ribeiro SG, Barros LMG et al (1998) Transgenic beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) engineered to express viral antisense RNAs show delayed and attenuated symptoms to bean golden mosaic geminivirus. Mol Breed 4:491–499. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009613607559
Kim JW, Minamikawa T (1996) Transformation and regeneration of French bean plants by the particle bombardment process. Plant Sci 117:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(96)04403-2
Bonfim K, Faria JC, Nogueira EOPL, Mendes EA, Aragao FJL (2007) RNAi-mediated resistance to bean golden mosaic virus in genetically engineered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Mol Plant Microbe In 20:717–726. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-6-0717
Christou P (1990) Morphological description of transgenic soybean chimeras created by the delivery, integration and expression of foreign DNA using electric discharge particle acceleration. Ann Bot 66:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088039
Krastanova S, Perrin M, Barbier P et al (1995) Transformation of grapevine rootstocks with the coat protein gene of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus. Plant Cell Rep 13:357–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231936
Xiang YZ, Ying HS, Zhi JC, Xian SZ (2008) Cell fate switch during in vitro plant organogenesis. J Integ Plant Biol 50:816–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00701.x
Steward FC, Mapes MO, Smith J (1958) Growth and organized development of cultured cells. I. Growth and division of freely suspended cells. Am J Bot 45:693–703
Haccius B (1978) Question of unicellular origin of non-zygotic embryos in callus cultures. Phytomorphology 28:74–81
Raghavan V (1976) Adventive embryogenesis: induction of diploid embryoids. In: Sutchliffe JF (ed) Experimental embryogenesis in vascular plants. Academic Press, London, pp 349–381
Xu Z, Zhang C, Zhang X et al (2013) Transcriptome profiling reveals auxin and cytokinin regulating somatic embryogenesis in different sister lines of cotton cultivar CCR124. J Integr Plant Biol 55:631–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12073
Allavena A, Rossetti L (1983) Efforts in somatic embryogenesis of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Acta Hort 131:239–246. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1983.131.27
Martins IS, Sondahl MR (1984) Early stages of somatic embryo differentiation from callus cells of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in liquid medium. J Plant Physiol 117:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(84)80021-8
Saunders JW, Hosfield GL, Levi A (1987) Morphogenetic effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaf explants in vitro. Plant Cell Rep 6:46–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269737
Hoyos RA (1990) Somatic embryogenesis in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): influence of media and environmental factors on globular and mature embryoid formation. Department of Crop and Soil Science. Michigan State University, USA
Collado R, Garcia LR, Angenon G et al (2011) Somatic embryos formation from immature cotyledons in Phaseolus vulgaris cv. CIAP 7247. Biotechnol Veg 11:235–240
Malik KA, Saxena PK (1992) Somatic embryogenesis and shoot regeneration from intact seedlings of Phaseolus acutifolius A., P. aureus (L.) Wilczek, P. coccineus, and P. wrightii L. Plant Cell Rep 11:163–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232172
Garcia LR, Pérez J, Kosky RG et al (2010) Regeneración de plantas via embriogénesis somática en Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray. Biotechnol Veg 10:143–149
Nafie EM, Taha HS, Mansur RM (2013) Impact of 24-epibrassinolide on callogenesis and regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv Brunca. World Appl Sci J 24:188–200. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.02.13191
Fehér A, Pasternak TP, Dudits D (2003) Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tiss Org 74:201–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024033216561
Karami O, Saidi A (2010) The molecular basis for stress-induced acquisition of somatic embryogenesis. Mol Biol Rep 37:2493–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-009-9764-3
Kamada H, Ishikawa K, Saga H, Harada H (1993) Induction of somatic embryogenesis in carrot by osmotic stress. Plant Tiss Cult Lett 10:38–44. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology1984.10.38
Lou H, Kako S (1995) Role of high sugar concentrations in inducing somatic embryogenesis from cucumber cotyledons. Sci Hort 64:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(95)00833-8
Ikeda-Iwai M, Umehara M, Satoh S, Kamada H (2003) Stress-induced somatic embryogenesis in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 34:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01702.x
Karami O, Deljou A, Esna-Ashari M, Ostad-Ahmadi P (2006) Effect of sucrose concentrations on somatic embryogenesis in carnation (Dianthus caryophillus L.). Sci Hort 110:340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.07.029
Dudits D., J. Györgyey, L. Bögre y L. Bakó, (1995) Molecular biology of somatic embryogenesis. In: Thorpe TA (ed) In vitro embryogenesis in plants, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 267–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0485-2_8
Werner T, Schmülling T (2009) Cytokinin action in plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:527–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.002
Ha S, Vankova R, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K et al (2012) Cytokinins: metabolism and function in plant adaptation to environmental stresses. Trends Plant Sci 17:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.12.005
Cabrera-Ponce JL, Lopez L, León-Ramírez CG et al (2015) Stress induced acquisition of somatic embryogenesis in common bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. Protoplasma 252:559–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0702-4
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
Barraza A, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Gamboa-Becerra R et al (2015) The Phaseolus vulgaris PvTRX1h gene regulates plant hormone biosynthesis in embryogenic callus from common bean. Front Plant Sci 6:577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00577
Kawashima T, Goldberg RB (2009) The suspensor: not just pending the embryo. Trends Plant Sci 15:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.002
Quiroz-Figueroa F, Rojas-Herrera R, Galaz-Avalos R, Loyola-Vargas V (2006) Embryo production through somatic embryogenesis can be used to study cell differentiation in plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org 86:285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9139-6
Urao T, Yakubov B, Satoh R et al (1999) A transmembrane hybrid-type histidine kinase in Arabidopsis functions as an osmosensor. Plant Cell 11:1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.9.1743
Tran LSP, Urao T, Qin F et al (2007) Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20623–20628. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706547105
Jeon J, Kim YN, Kim S et al (2010) A subset of cytokinins two-component signaling system plays a role in cold temperature stress response in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 285:23371–23386
Müller B, Sheen J (2008) Cytokinin and auxin interaction in root stem-cell specification during early embryogenesis. Nature 453:1094–1097. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06943
Hwang I, Sheen J (2001) Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature 413:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/35096500
Buechel S, Eibfried A, To JP et al (2010) Role of A-type ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATORS in meristem maintenance and regeneration. Eur J Cell Biol 89:279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.11.016
Su YH, Li YB, Bai B, Zhang XS (2015) Establishment of embryonic shoot-root axis in auxin and cytokinin response during Arabidopsis somatic embryogenesis. Front Plant Sci 5:792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00792
Murch SJ, KrishnaRaj S, Saxena PK (1997) Thidiazuron-induced morphogenesis of regal geranium (Pelargonium domesticum): a potential stress response. Physiol Plant 101:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01835.x
Victor JMR, Murthy BNS, Murch SJ et al (1999) Role of endogenous purine metabolism in thidiazuron induced somatic embryogenesis of peanut (Arachis hypogea L.). Plant Growth Regul 28:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006251531319
Ashihara H, Stasolla C, Loukanina N, Thorpe T (2001) Purine metabolism during white spruce somatic embryo development: salvage of adenine, adenosine and inosine. Plant Sci 160:647–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00441-6
Genga A, Allavena A (1991) Factors affecting morphogenesis from immature cotyledon of Phaseolus coccineus L. Plant Cell Tiss Org 27:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041289
El Dawayati MM, Abd El Bar OH, Zaid ZE, Zein El Din AFM (2012) In vitro morpho-histological studies of newly developed embryos from abnormal malformed embryos of date palms cv. Gundila under dessication effect of polyethelyne glycol treatments. Ann Agric Sci 57:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2012.08.005
Yeung EC, Brown DCW (1982) The osmotic environment of developing embryos of Phaseolus vulgaris. Z Pflanzenphysiol 106:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-328X(82)80077-9
Geerts P, Mergeai G, Baudoin JP (1999) Rescue of early-shaped embryos and plant regeneration of Phaseolus polyanthus Greenm. And Phaseolus vulgaris L. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 3:141–148
Roberts DR, Sutton BCS, Flinn BS (1990) Synchronous and high frequency germination of interior spruce somatic embryos following partial drying at high relative humidity. Can J Bot 68:1086–1090. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-136
Attree SM, Moore D, Sawhney VK, Fowke LC (1991) Enhanced maturation and desiccation tolerance of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) somatic embryos: effects of a non-plasmolysing water stress and abscisic acid. Ann Bot 68:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088291
Flinn BR, Roberts DR, Taylor IEP (1991) Evaluation of somatic embryos on interior spruce. Characterization and developmental regulation of storage proteins. Physiol Plant 82:624–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb02956.x
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by SAGARPA (Grant 2003-199). We thank Miss Sandra Chavez-León for her excellent technical assistance and Dra. Rosa Maria Rangel-Cano for the critical review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Cabrera-Ponce, J.L., González-Gómez, I.A., León-Ramírez, C.G., Sánchez-Arreguín, J.A., Jofre y Garfias, A.E. (2018). Somatic Embryogenesis in Common BeanPhaseolus vulgaris L.. In: Loyola-Vargas, V., Ochoa-Alejo, N. (eds) Plant Cell Culture Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1815. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8594-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8594-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8593-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8594-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols